Kakan C. Dey , Md Tawhidur Rahman , Subasish Das , Amrit Manova Williams
{"title":"考虑车辆与车辆和车辆与行人冲突的左转相位选择","authors":"Kakan C. Dey , Md Tawhidur Rahman , Subasish Das , Amrit Manova Williams","doi":"10.1016/j.jtte.2021.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Left-turning vehicle movement at signalized intersections with permissive left-turn phases creates safety concerns due to the higher chance of conflict with opposing-through vehicles and pedestrians. In this research, a simulation-based study was conducted to evaluate pedestrians' impact on traffic conflicts between left-turning vehicles and opposing-through vehicles (V-V conflicts) as well as traffic conflicts between left-turning vehicles and pedestrians (V-P conflicts) in the permissive left-turn phasing scenario. Intersections with different opposing-through volumes, left-turn volumes, number of opposing-through lanes, and pedestrian volumes were modeled in VISSIM, a traffic micro-simulator. The surrogate safety assessment model (SSAM) was used to estimate the number of V-V and V-P conflicts. The effect of pedestrian presence on V-V and V-P conflicts was evaluated using simulation scenarios with and without pedestrian presence. Simulation results revealed that pedestrian presence increased both V-V and V-P conflicts. As pedestrian presence increased the total number of traffic conflicts, permissive left-turn phasing processed fewer left-turn vehicles to maintain the same level of intersection safety with pedestrian presence compared to the no-pedestrian scenario. Since current left-turn phasing decision guidelines do not consider the impacts of pedestrian presence, this research quantified pedestrian-influenced and pedestrian-involved left-turn traffic conflicts to determine appropriate left-turn signal phasing decisions to ensure safe and efficient crossing of pedestrians and vehicles at signalized intersections. This simulation-based study's findings can be beneficial in the decision making of left-turn phasing selection as the before-after intersection safety performance analysis by collecting field data often resources intensive.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47239,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Left-turn phasing selection considering vehicle to vehicle and vehicle to pedestrian conflicts\",\"authors\":\"Kakan C. Dey , Md Tawhidur Rahman , Subasish Das , Amrit Manova Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtte.2021.07.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Left-turning vehicle movement at signalized intersections with permissive left-turn phases creates safety concerns due to the higher chance of conflict with opposing-through vehicles and pedestrians. In this research, a simulation-based study was conducted to evaluate pedestrians' impact on traffic conflicts between left-turning vehicles and opposing-through vehicles (V-V conflicts) as well as traffic conflicts between left-turning vehicles and pedestrians (V-P conflicts) in the permissive left-turn phasing scenario. Intersections with different opposing-through volumes, left-turn volumes, number of opposing-through lanes, and pedestrian volumes were modeled in VISSIM, a traffic micro-simulator. The surrogate safety assessment model (SSAM) was used to estimate the number of V-V and V-P conflicts. The effect of pedestrian presence on V-V and V-P conflicts was evaluated using simulation scenarios with and without pedestrian presence. Simulation results revealed that pedestrian presence increased both V-V and V-P conflicts. As pedestrian presence increased the total number of traffic conflicts, permissive left-turn phasing processed fewer left-turn vehicles to maintain the same level of intersection safety with pedestrian presence compared to the no-pedestrian scenario. Since current left-turn phasing decision guidelines do not consider the impacts of pedestrian presence, this research quantified pedestrian-influenced and pedestrian-involved left-turn traffic conflicts to determine appropriate left-turn signal phasing decisions to ensure safe and efficient crossing of pedestrians and vehicles at signalized intersections. This simulation-based study's findings can be beneficial in the decision making of left-turn phasing selection as the before-after intersection safety performance analysis by collecting field data often resources intensive.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095756423000077\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095756423000077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Left-turn phasing selection considering vehicle to vehicle and vehicle to pedestrian conflicts
Left-turning vehicle movement at signalized intersections with permissive left-turn phases creates safety concerns due to the higher chance of conflict with opposing-through vehicles and pedestrians. In this research, a simulation-based study was conducted to evaluate pedestrians' impact on traffic conflicts between left-turning vehicles and opposing-through vehicles (V-V conflicts) as well as traffic conflicts between left-turning vehicles and pedestrians (V-P conflicts) in the permissive left-turn phasing scenario. Intersections with different opposing-through volumes, left-turn volumes, number of opposing-through lanes, and pedestrian volumes were modeled in VISSIM, a traffic micro-simulator. The surrogate safety assessment model (SSAM) was used to estimate the number of V-V and V-P conflicts. The effect of pedestrian presence on V-V and V-P conflicts was evaluated using simulation scenarios with and without pedestrian presence. Simulation results revealed that pedestrian presence increased both V-V and V-P conflicts. As pedestrian presence increased the total number of traffic conflicts, permissive left-turn phasing processed fewer left-turn vehicles to maintain the same level of intersection safety with pedestrian presence compared to the no-pedestrian scenario. Since current left-turn phasing decision guidelines do not consider the impacts of pedestrian presence, this research quantified pedestrian-influenced and pedestrian-involved left-turn traffic conflicts to determine appropriate left-turn signal phasing decisions to ensure safe and efficient crossing of pedestrians and vehicles at signalized intersections. This simulation-based study's findings can be beneficial in the decision making of left-turn phasing selection as the before-after intersection safety performance analysis by collecting field data often resources intensive.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) serves as a renowned academic platform facilitating the exchange and exploration of innovative ideas in the realm of transportation. Our journal aims to foster theoretical and experimental research in transportation and welcomes the submission of exceptional peer-reviewed papers on engineering, planning, management, and information technology. We are dedicated to expediting the peer review process and ensuring timely publication of top-notch research in this field.