专家的分析在哪里结束,法官在刑事事项DNA评估期间的评估在哪里开始?具体案例的批判性分析

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Cherifa Benahmed
{"title":"专家的分析在哪里结束,法官在刑事事项DNA评估期间的评估在哪里开始?具体案例的批判性分析","authors":"Cherifa Benahmed","doi":"10.1016/j.meddro.2023.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Forensic expertise, specifically DNA identification, is increasingly being sought in criminal trials. It is well established that genetic expertise is an essential tool available to the justice system to provide a criminal response. This is so only if it is exploited by the legal framework governing its administration as criminal evidence. The latter provides that, although the analysis and interpretation of the scientific result are reserved for the expert part, it is nevertheless to the court to assess that part. While in theory, the boundaries drawn by the legislator appear clear, the practice reflects a confusion of role, thus calling into question the very essence of expertise.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":41275,"journal":{"name":"Medecine & Droit","volume":"2023 182","pages":"Pages 84-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Où finit l’analyse de l’expert et où commence l’appréciation du juge lors d’une expertise ADN en matière pénale ? Analyse critique d’un cas concret\",\"authors\":\"Cherifa Benahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.meddro.2023.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Forensic expertise, specifically DNA identification, is increasingly being sought in criminal trials. It is well established that genetic expertise is an essential tool available to the justice system to provide a criminal response. This is so only if it is exploited by the legal framework governing its administration as criminal evidence. The latter provides that, although the analysis and interpretation of the scientific result are reserved for the expert part, it is nevertheless to the court to assess that part. While in theory, the boundaries drawn by the legislator appear clear, the practice reflects a confusion of role, thus calling into question the very essence of expertise.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medecine & Droit\",\"volume\":\"2023 182\",\"pages\":\"Pages 84-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medecine & Droit\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246739123000015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medecine & Droit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246739123000015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的人在刑事审判中寻求法医专业知识,特别是DNA鉴定。众所周知,基因专业知识是司法系统提供刑事对策的重要工具。只有当管理其行政的法律框架将其作为刑事证据加以利用时,情况才会如此。后者规定,尽管对科学结果的分析和解释保留给专家部分,但仍应由法院对该部分进行评估。虽然在理论上,立法者划定的界限似乎很明确,但这种做法反映了角色的混乱,从而对专业知识的本质提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Où finit l’analyse de l’expert et où commence l’appréciation du juge lors d’une expertise ADN en matière pénale ? Analyse critique d’un cas concret

Forensic expertise, specifically DNA identification, is increasingly being sought in criminal trials. It is well established that genetic expertise is an essential tool available to the justice system to provide a criminal response. This is so only if it is exploited by the legal framework governing its administration as criminal evidence. The latter provides that, although the analysis and interpretation of the scientific result are reserved for the expert part, it is nevertheless to the court to assess that part. While in theory, the boundaries drawn by the legislator appear clear, the practice reflects a confusion of role, thus calling into question the very essence of expertise.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medecine & Droit
Medecine & Droit MEDICINE, LEGAL-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Scientific Committee of the journal Médecine et Droit includes professors of medicine, professors of law, magistrates, lawyers, court medical experts, and specialists in compensation for physical injury. Médecine et Droit provides: • rigorous and clear support for informative and educational matter • a tool for reflection and actualisation of knowledge • an essential link between doctors and lawyers. Médecine et Droit informs: • doctors on different aspects of law and regulations encountered in their profession • lawyers on the specific problems of the medical profession and important bio-ethical issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信