J.A. García Mejido , R. García-Jiménez , I. Pelayo-Delgado , R. Neguillo-Moguel , L. Rodríguez-Cruz , J.A. Sainz-Bueno
{"title":"超声引导活检诊断卵巢肿块。系统回顾","authors":"J.A. García Mejido , R. García-Jiménez , I. Pelayo-Delgado , R. Neguillo-Moguel , L. Rodríguez-Cruz , J.A. Sainz-Bueno","doi":"10.1016/j.gine.2023.100889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The definitive diagnosis of ovarian cancer requires histological confirmation. In certain situations, to avoid the morbidity of surgical resection, it is possible to perform an ultrasound-guided biopsy to obtain the pathological diagnosis. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the adequacy, reliability, accuracy, and safety profile of ultrasound-guided biopsy of ovarian masses. Following the PRISMA 2020 model, a bibliographic search was carried out in PubMed, Embase and Scopus, collecting a total of 10,245 articles, of which 24 were finally included. The studies mainly included patients with advanced inoperable tumors, poor performance status and other poor prognostic factors, with masses of solid content and irregular margins, generally accessible through the transvaginal route. In most of the articles, the patients had a previous history of malignancy or had inoperable tumors in advanced stages. Biopsiable ovarian masses were defined ultrasonographically as malignant or potentially malignant, mainly highlighting the presence of a solid or mixed component and irregular or heterogeneous margins. The most widely used technique in the included studies was core needle or tru-cut biopsy, presenting high values of adequacy, reliability, precision and performance, as well as a good safety profile with low complication rates. In conclusion, ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of adnexal masses in patients eligible for neoadjuvant treatment is a technique with high adequacy, reliability, and precision rates, as well as a good safety profile.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":41294,"journal":{"name":"Clinica e Investigacion en Ginecologia y Obstetricia","volume":"50 4","pages":"Article 100889"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biopsia guiada por ecografía para el diagnóstico de masas ováricas. Revisión sistemática\",\"authors\":\"J.A. García Mejido , R. García-Jiménez , I. Pelayo-Delgado , R. Neguillo-Moguel , L. Rodríguez-Cruz , J.A. Sainz-Bueno\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gine.2023.100889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The definitive diagnosis of ovarian cancer requires histological confirmation. In certain situations, to avoid the morbidity of surgical resection, it is possible to perform an ultrasound-guided biopsy to obtain the pathological diagnosis. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the adequacy, reliability, accuracy, and safety profile of ultrasound-guided biopsy of ovarian masses. Following the PRISMA 2020 model, a bibliographic search was carried out in PubMed, Embase and Scopus, collecting a total of 10,245 articles, of which 24 were finally included. The studies mainly included patients with advanced inoperable tumors, poor performance status and other poor prognostic factors, with masses of solid content and irregular margins, generally accessible through the transvaginal route. In most of the articles, the patients had a previous history of malignancy or had inoperable tumors in advanced stages. Biopsiable ovarian masses were defined ultrasonographically as malignant or potentially malignant, mainly highlighting the presence of a solid or mixed component and irregular or heterogeneous margins. The most widely used technique in the included studies was core needle or tru-cut biopsy, presenting high values of adequacy, reliability, precision and performance, as well as a good safety profile with low complication rates. In conclusion, ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of adnexal masses in patients eligible for neoadjuvant treatment is a technique with high adequacy, reliability, and precision rates, as well as a good safety profile.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinica e Investigacion en Ginecologia y Obstetricia\",\"volume\":\"50 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100889\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinica e Investigacion en Ginecologia y Obstetricia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210573X2300059X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica e Investigacion en Ginecologia y Obstetricia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210573X2300059X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Biopsia guiada por ecografía para el diagnóstico de masas ováricas. Revisión sistemática
The definitive diagnosis of ovarian cancer requires histological confirmation. In certain situations, to avoid the morbidity of surgical resection, it is possible to perform an ultrasound-guided biopsy to obtain the pathological diagnosis. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the adequacy, reliability, accuracy, and safety profile of ultrasound-guided biopsy of ovarian masses. Following the PRISMA 2020 model, a bibliographic search was carried out in PubMed, Embase and Scopus, collecting a total of 10,245 articles, of which 24 were finally included. The studies mainly included patients with advanced inoperable tumors, poor performance status and other poor prognostic factors, with masses of solid content and irregular margins, generally accessible through the transvaginal route. In most of the articles, the patients had a previous history of malignancy or had inoperable tumors in advanced stages. Biopsiable ovarian masses were defined ultrasonographically as malignant or potentially malignant, mainly highlighting the presence of a solid or mixed component and irregular or heterogeneous margins. The most widely used technique in the included studies was core needle or tru-cut biopsy, presenting high values of adequacy, reliability, precision and performance, as well as a good safety profile with low complication rates. In conclusion, ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of adnexal masses in patients eligible for neoadjuvant treatment is a technique with high adequacy, reliability, and precision rates, as well as a good safety profile.
期刊介绍:
Una excelente publicación para mantenerse al día en los temas de máximo interés de la ginecología de vanguardia. Resulta idónea tanto para el especialista en ginecología, como en obstetricia o en pediatría, y está presente en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.