个体化信息对内隐人知觉的影响在个体差异和两种类型的目标群体中基本一致

Q1 Psychology
Rachel S. Rubinstein , Madelyn Marshall , Lee Jussim , Nathan Honeycutt
{"title":"个体化信息对内隐人知觉的影响在个体差异和两种类型的目标群体中基本一致","authors":"Rachel S. Rubinstein ,&nbsp;Madelyn Marshall ,&nbsp;Lee Jussim ,&nbsp;Nathan Honeycutt","doi":"10.1016/j.crbeha.2022.100090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Previous research has investigated characteristics of individuating information, stereotypes, and evaluative circumstances that moderate reliance on social category information and individuating information in implicit person perception. However, possibly no research has examined characteristics of <em>perceivers</em> that may be involved in these processes. In four studies (<em>N</em> = 1545), the present research tested the effects of six individual differences on application of race and gender stereotypes in implicit perceptions of individuals and the potential moderating effects of diagnosticity of individuating information. We found that individuating information affected implicit person similarly regardless of the diagnosticity of the individuating information, the target group, and—largely—individual differences. Although these findings involved several null results, these results are nonetheless informative because they provide evidence that individuating information is a promising means of bias reduction given its consistent effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72746,"journal":{"name":"Current research in behavioral sciences","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100090"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of individuating information on implicit person perception are largely consistent across individual differences and two types of target groups\",\"authors\":\"Rachel S. Rubinstein ,&nbsp;Madelyn Marshall ,&nbsp;Lee Jussim ,&nbsp;Nathan Honeycutt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.crbeha.2022.100090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Previous research has investigated characteristics of individuating information, stereotypes, and evaluative circumstances that moderate reliance on social category information and individuating information in implicit person perception. However, possibly no research has examined characteristics of <em>perceivers</em> that may be involved in these processes. In four studies (<em>N</em> = 1545), the present research tested the effects of six individual differences on application of race and gender stereotypes in implicit perceptions of individuals and the potential moderating effects of diagnosticity of individuating information. We found that individuating information affected implicit person similarly regardless of the diagnosticity of the individuating information, the target group, and—largely—individual differences. Although these findings involved several null results, these results are nonetheless informative because they provide evidence that individuating information is a promising means of bias reduction given its consistent effects.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current research in behavioral sciences\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100090\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current research in behavioral sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666518222000250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in behavioral sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666518222000250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的研究调查了个体信息、刻板印象和评价环境的特征,这些特征在内隐的人感知中适度依赖社会类别信息和个体信息。然而,可能没有任何研究考察可能参与这些过程的感知者的特征。在四项研究中(N=1545),本研究测试了六个个体差异对个体内隐认知中种族和性别刻板印象应用的影响,以及个性化信息诊断性的潜在调节作用。我们发现,无论个体信息的诊断性、目标群体以及很大程度上的个体差异如何,个体信息对内隐人的影响都是相似的。尽管这些发现涉及几个无效的结果,但这些结果仍然是有信息的,因为它们提供了证据,证明个性化信息是一种很有前途的减少偏见的方法,因为它具有一致的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of individuating information on implicit person perception are largely consistent across individual differences and two types of target groups

Previous research has investigated characteristics of individuating information, stereotypes, and evaluative circumstances that moderate reliance on social category information and individuating information in implicit person perception. However, possibly no research has examined characteristics of perceivers that may be involved in these processes. In four studies (N = 1545), the present research tested the effects of six individual differences on application of race and gender stereotypes in implicit perceptions of individuals and the potential moderating effects of diagnosticity of individuating information. We found that individuating information affected implicit person similarly regardless of the diagnosticity of the individuating information, the target group, and—largely—individual differences. Although these findings involved several null results, these results are nonetheless informative because they provide evidence that individuating information is a promising means of bias reduction given its consistent effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current research in behavioral sciences
Current research in behavioral sciences Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信