初级保健医生的行政负担、动机和福利。管理模式比较

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Xavier Ballart , Francisco Ferraioli , Antoni Iruela
{"title":"初级保健医生的行政负担、动机和福利。管理模式比较","authors":"Xavier Ballart ,&nbsp;Francisco Ferraioli ,&nbsp;Antoni Iruela","doi":"10.1016/j.gaceta.2023.102306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To analyze the relationship between administrative burden and intrinsic motivation and between administrative burden and professional well-being among family and community medicine physicians. To analyze the extent to which attention to three basic needs (autonomy, sense of competence and relationship capacity) that one of the main motivation theories identifies as a generator of intrinsic motivation compensates for the negative effect of the administrative burden. To compare management models.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Data from a survey (542 valid questionnaires) carried out through the Catalan Society of Family and Community Medicine are used. Data analysis is based on multiple regression and ANOVA techniques.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The perception of administrative burden and “red tape” are clearly demotivating and reduce job satisfaction. On the contrary, individual autonomy, networking opportunities between professionals and performance feedback are motivating and feed the perception of professional well-being. The EBA (Association Based Entity) model presents results above the ICS (Catalan Health Institute) and OSI (Integrated Health Organizations) models both in controlling the negative effect of administrative burden and in the management of basic psychological needs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The motivation and professional well-being of primary care physicians would benefit from reforms that limit the administrative burden of some procedures and red tape. At the primary health center level, greater attention to individual autonomy, improving relatedness between professionals and the sense of competence based on better information on individual performance can offset the negative effects of the administrative burden.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12494,"journal":{"name":"Gaceta Sanitaria","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 102306"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carga administrativa, motivación y bienestar entre médicos de atención primaria. Comparación entre modelos de gestión\",\"authors\":\"Xavier Ballart ,&nbsp;Francisco Ferraioli ,&nbsp;Antoni Iruela\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gaceta.2023.102306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To analyze the relationship between administrative burden and intrinsic motivation and between administrative burden and professional well-being among family and community medicine physicians. To analyze the extent to which attention to three basic needs (autonomy, sense of competence and relationship capacity) that one of the main motivation theories identifies as a generator of intrinsic motivation compensates for the negative effect of the administrative burden. To compare management models.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Data from a survey (542 valid questionnaires) carried out through the Catalan Society of Family and Community Medicine are used. Data analysis is based on multiple regression and ANOVA techniques.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The perception of administrative burden and “red tape” are clearly demotivating and reduce job satisfaction. On the contrary, individual autonomy, networking opportunities between professionals and performance feedback are motivating and feed the perception of professional well-being. The EBA (Association Based Entity) model presents results above the ICS (Catalan Health Institute) and OSI (Integrated Health Organizations) models both in controlling the negative effect of administrative burden and in the management of basic psychological needs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The motivation and professional well-being of primary care physicians would benefit from reforms that limit the administrative burden of some procedures and red tape. At the primary health center level, greater attention to individual autonomy, improving relatedness between professionals and the sense of competence based on better information on individual performance can offset the negative effects of the administrative burden.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gaceta Sanitaria\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102306\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gaceta Sanitaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213911123000201\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaceta Sanitaria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213911123000201","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的分析家庭和社区医生的行政负担与内在动机、行政负担与职业幸福感的关系。分析对三种基本需求(自主性、能力感和关系能力)的关注在多大程度上弥补了行政负担的负面影响,其中一种主要的动机理论认为这三种基本需要是内在动机的产生者。比较管理模式。方法采用加泰罗尼亚家庭和社区医学协会的调查数据(542份有效问卷)。数据分析基于多元回归和方差分析技术。结果对行政负担和“繁文缛节”的认知明显削弱了工作的积极性,降低了工作满意度。相反,个人自主性、专业人士之间的人际网络机会和绩效反馈激励并促进了对职业幸福感的感知。EBA(基于协会的实体)模型在控制行政负担的负面影响和管理基本心理需求方面都优于ICS(加泰罗尼亚卫生研究所)和OSI(综合卫生组织)模型。结论限制某些程序和繁文缛节的行政负担的改革将有利于初级保健医生的动机和职业健康。在初级卫生中心一级,更多地关注个人自主性,改善专业人员之间的关系,以及基于更好的个人表现信息的能力感,可以抵消行政负担的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carga administrativa, motivación y bienestar entre médicos de atención primaria. Comparación entre modelos de gestión

Objective

To analyze the relationship between administrative burden and intrinsic motivation and between administrative burden and professional well-being among family and community medicine physicians. To analyze the extent to which attention to three basic needs (autonomy, sense of competence and relationship capacity) that one of the main motivation theories identifies as a generator of intrinsic motivation compensates for the negative effect of the administrative burden. To compare management models.

Method

Data from a survey (542 valid questionnaires) carried out through the Catalan Society of Family and Community Medicine are used. Data analysis is based on multiple regression and ANOVA techniques.

Results

The perception of administrative burden and “red tape” are clearly demotivating and reduce job satisfaction. On the contrary, individual autonomy, networking opportunities between professionals and performance feedback are motivating and feed the perception of professional well-being. The EBA (Association Based Entity) model presents results above the ICS (Catalan Health Institute) and OSI (Integrated Health Organizations) models both in controlling the negative effect of administrative burden and in the management of basic psychological needs.

Conclusions

The motivation and professional well-being of primary care physicians would benefit from reforms that limit the administrative burden of some procedures and red tape. At the primary health center level, greater attention to individual autonomy, improving relatedness between professionals and the sense of competence based on better information on individual performance can offset the negative effects of the administrative burden.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gaceta Sanitaria
Gaceta Sanitaria 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
80
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Gaceta Sanitaria (Health Gazette) is an international journal that accepts articles in Spanish and in English. It is the official scientific journal of the Sociedad Española de Salud Publica y Administración Sanitaria (Spanish Society of Public Health and Health Administration) (SESPAS). The Journal publishes 6 issues per year on different areas of Public Health and Health Administration, including: -Applied epidemiology- Health prevention and promotion- Environmental health- International health- Management and assessment of policies and services- Health technology assessments- Health economics. The editorial process is regulated by a peer review system. It publishes original works, reviews, opinion articles, field and methodology notes, protocols, letters to the editor, editorials, and debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信