无并发症胆绞痛早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术的观察研究

Q3 Medicine
Krishnendu Vidyadharan, Rajkumar KembaiShanmugam, Ganesan Ayyasamy, Satheshkumar Thandayuthapani
{"title":"无并发症胆绞痛早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术的观察研究","authors":"Krishnendu Vidyadharan,&nbsp;Rajkumar KembaiShanmugam,&nbsp;Ganesan Ayyasamy,&nbsp;Satheshkumar Thandayuthapani","doi":"10.1016/j.lers.2023.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Biliary colic is a condition treated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, the outcomes of surgery depend on early or delayed time points. Few research findings reported no benefits of early over delayed, on contra, other reported benefits. This study aims to compare the benefits associated with early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy among uncomplicated biliary colic patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This observational study included patients with right upper abdominal pain and abdominal ultrasound showing cholelithiasis. Patients who were admitted at the first and second visits (within 6 weeks of the first visit) were assigned to the early and delayed groups, respectively. All participants were followed up for one-week postsurgery. The diagnosis of the patient, postoperative hospital stay, duration of surgery and complications were noted and compared primarily.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 80 patients were included, 40 each in the early group and delayed group. The patients in the two groups had comparable mean ages (40.55 ± 13.12 y vs. 40.45 ± 12.06 y, <em>p</em> = 0.972). The early group had more female patients (72.5% vs. 45.0%, <em>p</em> = 0.012). The duration of hospital stay (2.18 ± 0.38 d vs. 2.68 ± 1.04 d, <em>p</em> = 0.009) and duration of surgery (61.63 ± 3.64 min vs. 71.13 ± 16.19 min, <em>p</em> = 0.001) were found to be significantly different between the early and delayed groups. Only 1 (2.5%) patient in both groups was converted to open cholecystectomy. Recurrent biliary colic requiring hospital admission was seen in 1 (2.5%) patient and 6 (15.0%) patients, acute cholecystitis in 2 (5.0%) and 6 (15.0%), biliary pancreatitis in 1 (2.5%) and 2 (5.0%), and obstructive jaundice in 1 (2.5%) and 1 (2.5%) in the early and delayed groups, respectively, with insignificant differences (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy decreases the operating time and duration of hospital stay. In terms of postoperative complications, our study did not find any significant difference between the groups.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":32893,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","volume":"6 2","pages":"Pages 69-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in uncomplicated biliary colic: An observational study\",\"authors\":\"Krishnendu Vidyadharan,&nbsp;Rajkumar KembaiShanmugam,&nbsp;Ganesan Ayyasamy,&nbsp;Satheshkumar Thandayuthapani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lers.2023.05.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Biliary colic is a condition treated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, the outcomes of surgery depend on early or delayed time points. Few research findings reported no benefits of early over delayed, on contra, other reported benefits. This study aims to compare the benefits associated with early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy among uncomplicated biliary colic patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This observational study included patients with right upper abdominal pain and abdominal ultrasound showing cholelithiasis. Patients who were admitted at the first and second visits (within 6 weeks of the first visit) were assigned to the early and delayed groups, respectively. All participants were followed up for one-week postsurgery. The diagnosis of the patient, postoperative hospital stay, duration of surgery and complications were noted and compared primarily.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 80 patients were included, 40 each in the early group and delayed group. The patients in the two groups had comparable mean ages (40.55 ± 13.12 y vs. 40.45 ± 12.06 y, <em>p</em> = 0.972). The early group had more female patients (72.5% vs. 45.0%, <em>p</em> = 0.012). The duration of hospital stay (2.18 ± 0.38 d vs. 2.68 ± 1.04 d, <em>p</em> = 0.009) and duration of surgery (61.63 ± 3.64 min vs. 71.13 ± 16.19 min, <em>p</em> = 0.001) were found to be significantly different between the early and delayed groups. Only 1 (2.5%) patient in both groups was converted to open cholecystectomy. Recurrent biliary colic requiring hospital admission was seen in 1 (2.5%) patient and 6 (15.0%) patients, acute cholecystitis in 2 (5.0%) and 6 (15.0%), biliary pancreatitis in 1 (2.5%) and 2 (5.0%), and obstructive jaundice in 1 (2.5%) and 1 (2.5%) in the early and delayed groups, respectively, with insignificant differences (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy decreases the operating time and duration of hospital stay. In terms of postoperative complications, our study did not find any significant difference between the groups.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 69-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900923000269\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900923000269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的胆绞痛是腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗的一种疾病。然而,手术的结果取决于早期或延迟的时间点。很少有研究结果表明早期过度延迟没有益处,相反,其他报道的益处。本研究旨在比较无并发症胆绞痛患者早期和延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术的益处。方法本观察研究包括右上腹部疼痛和腹部超声显示胆结石的患者。在第一次和第二次就诊时(第一次就诊后6周内)入院的患者分别被分为早期组和延迟组。所有参与者都接受了为期一周的术后随访。对患者的诊断、术后住院时间、手术时间和并发症进行了初步记录和比较。结果共纳入80例患者,早期组和延迟组各40例。两组患者的平均年龄相当(40.55±13.12岁vs.40.45±12.06岁,p=0.072)。早期组女性患者较多(72.5%vs.45.0%,p=0.012)。住院时间(2.18±0.38天vs.2.68±1.04天,p=0.009)和手术时间(61.63±3.64分钟vs.71.13±16.19分钟,p=0.001)差异显著在早期组和延迟组之间。两组中只有1例(2.5%)患者转为开放性胆囊切除术。早期组和延迟组分别有1例(2.5%)和6例(15.0%)患者出现需要住院治疗的复发性胆绞痛,2例(5.0%)和6名(15.0%,结论早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术可缩短手术时间和住院时间。在术后并发症方面,我们的研究没有发现两组之间有任何显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in uncomplicated biliary colic: An observational study

Objective

Biliary colic is a condition treated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, the outcomes of surgery depend on early or delayed time points. Few research findings reported no benefits of early over delayed, on contra, other reported benefits. This study aims to compare the benefits associated with early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy among uncomplicated biliary colic patients.

Methods

This observational study included patients with right upper abdominal pain and abdominal ultrasound showing cholelithiasis. Patients who were admitted at the first and second visits (within 6 weeks of the first visit) were assigned to the early and delayed groups, respectively. All participants were followed up for one-week postsurgery. The diagnosis of the patient, postoperative hospital stay, duration of surgery and complications were noted and compared primarily.

Results

A total of 80 patients were included, 40 each in the early group and delayed group. The patients in the two groups had comparable mean ages (40.55 ± 13.12 y vs. 40.45 ± 12.06 y, p = 0.972). The early group had more female patients (72.5% vs. 45.0%, p = 0.012). The duration of hospital stay (2.18 ± 0.38 d vs. 2.68 ± 1.04 d, p = 0.009) and duration of surgery (61.63 ± 3.64 min vs. 71.13 ± 16.19 min, p = 0.001) were found to be significantly different between the early and delayed groups. Only 1 (2.5%) patient in both groups was converted to open cholecystectomy. Recurrent biliary colic requiring hospital admission was seen in 1 (2.5%) patient and 6 (15.0%) patients, acute cholecystitis in 2 (5.0%) and 6 (15.0%), biliary pancreatitis in 1 (2.5%) and 2 (5.0%), and obstructive jaundice in 1 (2.5%) and 1 (2.5%) in the early and delayed groups, respectively, with insignificant differences (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy decreases the operating time and duration of hospital stay. In terms of postoperative complications, our study did not find any significant difference between the groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery
Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery minimally invasive surgery-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery aims to provide an academic exchange platform for minimally invasive surgery at an international level. We seek out and publish the excellent original articles, reviews and editorials as well as exciting new techniques to promote the academic development. Topics of interests include, but are not limited to: ▪ Minimally invasive clinical research mainly in General Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, Urology, Neurosurgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, Gastroenterology, Orthopedics, Colorectal Surgery, Otolaryngology, etc.; ▪ Basic research in minimally invasive surgery; ▪ Research of techniques and equipments in minimally invasive surgery, and application of laparoscopy, endoscopy, robot and medical imaging; ▪ Development of medical education in minimally invasive surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信