象山铀矿田石英-中间脉的年代学和地球化学:岩石成因、构造背景和铀矿化意义

IF 1.4 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Yong-Jian Wang, Jiang-Tao Nie, Jin-Rong Lin, Hong-Zuo Wang
{"title":"象山铀矿田石英-中间脉的年代学和地球化学:岩石成因、构造背景和铀矿化意义","authors":"Yong-Jian Wang,&nbsp;Jiang-Tao Nie,&nbsp;Jin-Rong Lin,&nbsp;Hong-Zuo Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00710-022-00780-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Xiangshan volcanic-related uranium ore field, as the historic largest uranium producer in China, is characterized by a large volcanic-intrusive complex and a number of uranium deposits. In most of the deposits, various types of dikes are spatially associated with the uranium ore bodies, although there have been no systematic attempts to integrate the geochronology and petrogenesis of these dykes and their link with uranium mineralization. In this study, whole-rock major and trace elements, zircon U–Pb dating and zircon Hf–O isotopic analysis were carried out on the Xiagnshan felsic-intermediate dikes, including granitic porphyry, quartz monzonitic porphyry and dioritic porphyry. These felsic-intermediate dikes have the similar geochemical characteristics with the major ore-hosting volcanic rocks, such as enrichment in large lithophile elements (i.e., Rb and Th) and some high-field strength elements (i.e., Zr, Y), but relative depletion in Sr, Ba, P and Ti. These dikes also exhibit zircon ε<sub>Hf</sub>(t) values concentrating from -9 to -4 and zircon δ<sup>18</sup>O values ranging from 7.6 to 10.0 ‰. Geochemical and isotopic data suggest that these dikes were predominantly derived from partial melting of crustal materials and possibly mingled with different proportions of mantle-derived materials during the formation of melts. SIMS and SHRIMP U–Pb dating of zircon grains from these felsic-intermediate dikes yield high-precision ages ranging from 136 to 131 Ma. Combined with previously reported age data indicates a rapid and concentrated dike emplacement event, although a few mafic-felsic dikes were sporadically emplaced at 126 -122 Ma. Such a relatively concentrated dike emplacement in the Early Cretaceous were most likely caused by the back-arc extension or intra-arc rift due to progressive rollback of the Paleo-Pacific Plate. Previous metallogenetic studies supported that the late-stage dikes at Xiangshan were temporally and spatially closely related to uranium mineralization. However, our new geochronological data and field observations indicate that the two episodes of uranium mineralization were not synchronous with the majority of dikes intrusions, indicating that they probably have no direct relationship in origin and that spatial coexistence were more likely due to multistage activities of faults. Rather, these dikes might act as a relatively reduced environment, and thus could facilitate the precipitation of uranium. In addition, all of these dikes can be considered favorable prospecting indicators in the Xiangshan ore field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18547,"journal":{"name":"Mineralogy and Petrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geochronology and geochemistry of the felsic-intermediate dikes from Xiangshan uranium ore field, South China: Implications for petrogenesis, tectonic setting and uranium mineralization\",\"authors\":\"Yong-Jian Wang,&nbsp;Jiang-Tao Nie,&nbsp;Jin-Rong Lin,&nbsp;Hong-Zuo Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00710-022-00780-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Xiangshan volcanic-related uranium ore field, as the historic largest uranium producer in China, is characterized by a large volcanic-intrusive complex and a number of uranium deposits. In most of the deposits, various types of dikes are spatially associated with the uranium ore bodies, although there have been no systematic attempts to integrate the geochronology and petrogenesis of these dykes and their link with uranium mineralization. In this study, whole-rock major and trace elements, zircon U–Pb dating and zircon Hf–O isotopic analysis were carried out on the Xiagnshan felsic-intermediate dikes, including granitic porphyry, quartz monzonitic porphyry and dioritic porphyry. These felsic-intermediate dikes have the similar geochemical characteristics with the major ore-hosting volcanic rocks, such as enrichment in large lithophile elements (i.e., Rb and Th) and some high-field strength elements (i.e., Zr, Y), but relative depletion in Sr, Ba, P and Ti. These dikes also exhibit zircon ε<sub>Hf</sub>(t) values concentrating from -9 to -4 and zircon δ<sup>18</sup>O values ranging from 7.6 to 10.0 ‰. Geochemical and isotopic data suggest that these dikes were predominantly derived from partial melting of crustal materials and possibly mingled with different proportions of mantle-derived materials during the formation of melts. SIMS and SHRIMP U–Pb dating of zircon grains from these felsic-intermediate dikes yield high-precision ages ranging from 136 to 131 Ma. Combined with previously reported age data indicates a rapid and concentrated dike emplacement event, although a few mafic-felsic dikes were sporadically emplaced at 126 -122 Ma. Such a relatively concentrated dike emplacement in the Early Cretaceous were most likely caused by the back-arc extension or intra-arc rift due to progressive rollback of the Paleo-Pacific Plate. Previous metallogenetic studies supported that the late-stage dikes at Xiangshan were temporally and spatially closely related to uranium mineralization. However, our new geochronological data and field observations indicate that the two episodes of uranium mineralization were not synchronous with the majority of dikes intrusions, indicating that they probably have no direct relationship in origin and that spatial coexistence were more likely due to multistage activities of faults. Rather, these dikes might act as a relatively reduced environment, and thus could facilitate the precipitation of uranium. In addition, all of these dikes can be considered favorable prospecting indicators in the Xiangshan ore field.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mineralogy and Petrology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mineralogy and Petrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00710-022-00780-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mineralogy and Petrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00710-022-00780-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

象山火山型铀矿田是中国历史上最大的铀矿田,具有大型火山-侵入杂岩和大量铀矿床的特征。在大多数矿床中,各种类型的岩脉在空间上与铀矿体联系在一起,但没有系统地尝试将这些岩脉的年代学、岩石成因及其与铀矿化的联系结合起来。本文对下山长英质-中间斑岩(花岗斑岩、石英二长斑岩和闪长斑岩)进行了全岩主微量元素、锆石U-Pb定年和锆石Hf-O同位素分析。这些长质-中间岩脉与主要的含矿火山岩具有相似的地球化学特征,富集大亲石元素(Rb、Th)和部分高场强元素(Zr、Y),相对缺乏Sr、Ba、P、Ti。锆石εHf(t)值集中在-9 ~ -4之间,锆石δ18O值介于7.6 ~ 10.0‰之间。地球化学和同位素资料表明,这些岩脉主要来源于地壳物质的部分熔融,并可能在熔体形成过程中混合了不同比例的幔源物质。石英-中间岩脉锆石的SIMS和SHRIMP U-Pb定年得到了136 ~ 131 Ma的高精度年龄。结合前人报道的年龄数据表明,虽然在126 ~ 122 Ma有少量镁质-长英质岩脉零星侵位,但岩脉侵位速度快且集中。早白垩世如此相对集中的脉位极有可能是古太平洋板块渐进性回退导致的弧后伸展或弧内裂谷所致。前人的成矿学研究表明,象山晚期岩脉在时间和空间上与铀矿化密切相关。然而,新的年代学资料和野外观测表明,这两期铀矿化与大多数岩脉侵入并不同步,表明它们可能在起源上没有直接关系,更可能是由于断层的多期活动而在空间上共存。相反,这些岩脉可能作为一个相对减少的环境,因此可以促进铀的沉淀。这些岩脉均可视为象山矿田有利的找矿标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Geochronology and geochemistry of the felsic-intermediate dikes from Xiangshan uranium ore field, South China: Implications for petrogenesis, tectonic setting and uranium mineralization

Geochronology and geochemistry of the felsic-intermediate dikes from Xiangshan uranium ore field, South China: Implications for petrogenesis, tectonic setting and uranium mineralization

Xiangshan volcanic-related uranium ore field, as the historic largest uranium producer in China, is characterized by a large volcanic-intrusive complex and a number of uranium deposits. In most of the deposits, various types of dikes are spatially associated with the uranium ore bodies, although there have been no systematic attempts to integrate the geochronology and petrogenesis of these dykes and their link with uranium mineralization. In this study, whole-rock major and trace elements, zircon U–Pb dating and zircon Hf–O isotopic analysis were carried out on the Xiagnshan felsic-intermediate dikes, including granitic porphyry, quartz monzonitic porphyry and dioritic porphyry. These felsic-intermediate dikes have the similar geochemical characteristics with the major ore-hosting volcanic rocks, such as enrichment in large lithophile elements (i.e., Rb and Th) and some high-field strength elements (i.e., Zr, Y), but relative depletion in Sr, Ba, P and Ti. These dikes also exhibit zircon εHf(t) values concentrating from -9 to -4 and zircon δ18O values ranging from 7.6 to 10.0 ‰. Geochemical and isotopic data suggest that these dikes were predominantly derived from partial melting of crustal materials and possibly mingled with different proportions of mantle-derived materials during the formation of melts. SIMS and SHRIMP U–Pb dating of zircon grains from these felsic-intermediate dikes yield high-precision ages ranging from 136 to 131 Ma. Combined with previously reported age data indicates a rapid and concentrated dike emplacement event, although a few mafic-felsic dikes were sporadically emplaced at 126 -122 Ma. Such a relatively concentrated dike emplacement in the Early Cretaceous were most likely caused by the back-arc extension or intra-arc rift due to progressive rollback of the Paleo-Pacific Plate. Previous metallogenetic studies supported that the late-stage dikes at Xiangshan were temporally and spatially closely related to uranium mineralization. However, our new geochronological data and field observations indicate that the two episodes of uranium mineralization were not synchronous with the majority of dikes intrusions, indicating that they probably have no direct relationship in origin and that spatial coexistence were more likely due to multistage activities of faults. Rather, these dikes might act as a relatively reduced environment, and thus could facilitate the precipitation of uranium. In addition, all of these dikes can be considered favorable prospecting indicators in the Xiangshan ore field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mineralogy and Petrology
Mineralogy and Petrology 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Mineralogy and Petrology welcomes manuscripts from the classical fields of mineralogy, igneous and metamorphic petrology, geochemistry, crystallography, as well as their applications in academic experimentation and research, materials science and engineering, for technology, industry, environment, or society. The journal strongly promotes cross-fertilization among Earth-scientific and applied materials-oriented disciplines. Purely descriptive manuscripts on regional topics will not be considered. Mineralogy and Petrology was founded in 1872 by Gustav Tschermak as "Mineralogische und Petrographische Mittheilungen". It is one of Europe''s oldest geoscience journals. Former editors include outstanding names such as Gustav Tschermak, Friedrich Becke, Felix Machatschki, Josef Zemann, and Eugen F. Stumpfl.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信