在晚期人工流产引产中,以吡曲明为基础的患者自控镇痛(PCA)作为疼痛控制护理标准的实施:一项从患者角度进行的前瞻性队列研究

IF 1.5 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
L. Tascón Padrón , N.L.A. Emrich , B. Strizek , A. Gass , C. Link , T. Hilbert , S. Klaschik , W. Meissner , U. Gembruch , J. Jiménez Cruz
{"title":"在晚期人工流产引产中,以吡曲明为基础的患者自控镇痛(PCA)作为疼痛控制护理标准的实施:一项从患者角度进行的前瞻性队列研究","authors":"L. Tascón Padrón ,&nbsp;N.L.A. Emrich ,&nbsp;B. Strizek ,&nbsp;A. Gass ,&nbsp;C. Link ,&nbsp;T. Hilbert ,&nbsp;S. Klaschik ,&nbsp;W. Meissner ,&nbsp;U. Gembruch ,&nbsp;J. Jiménez Cruz","doi":"10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess whether the implementation of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with piritramide using an automatic pump system under routine conditions is effective to reduce pain in late abortion inductions</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Prospective observational cohort study</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Patients requiring medically indicated abortion induction from 14 weeks of pregnancy onwards between July 2019 and July 2020 at the department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine of the Bonn University Hospital in Germany.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Evaluation of pain management after implementation of a PCA system compared with previous nurse-controlled tramadol-based standard under routine conditions. Patients answered a validated pain questionnaire and requirement of rescue analgesics was assessed. Pain intensity and satisfaction were measured on a ten-point numeric rating scale. Main Outcome Measure Maximal pain intensity</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty patients were included. Patients using Piritramide-PCA complained of higher pain sores than those in the standard group (6.90 (± 2.34) vs. 4.83 (± 2.87), (p &lt; 0.05)). In both groups the level of satisfaction with the analgesia received was comparable (8.00 (± 2.45) vs 7.67 (± 2.62), (p = 0.7)). Patients in the PCA group suffered more nausea (63.2 % vs 30 % respectively, OR 4.0, 95 % CI 1.05–15.20, p &lt; 0.05) and expressed more the desire for more analgesic support compared to the control group (OR 5.7 (1–33.25), p = 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Women with abortion induction after 14 weeks of gestation suffer from relevant severe pain, which requires adequate therapy. However, addition of PCA does not seem to bring any advantage in patients undergoing this procedure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37085,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of a piritramide based patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) as a standard of care for pain control in late abortion induction: A prospective cohort study from a patient perspective\",\"authors\":\"L. Tascón Padrón ,&nbsp;N.L.A. Emrich ,&nbsp;B. Strizek ,&nbsp;A. Gass ,&nbsp;C. Link ,&nbsp;T. Hilbert ,&nbsp;S. Klaschik ,&nbsp;W. Meissner ,&nbsp;U. Gembruch ,&nbsp;J. Jiménez Cruz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess whether the implementation of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with piritramide using an automatic pump system under routine conditions is effective to reduce pain in late abortion inductions</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Prospective observational cohort study</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Patients requiring medically indicated abortion induction from 14 weeks of pregnancy onwards between July 2019 and July 2020 at the department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine of the Bonn University Hospital in Germany.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Evaluation of pain management after implementation of a PCA system compared with previous nurse-controlled tramadol-based standard under routine conditions. Patients answered a validated pain questionnaire and requirement of rescue analgesics was assessed. Pain intensity and satisfaction were measured on a ten-point numeric rating scale. Main Outcome Measure Maximal pain intensity</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty patients were included. Patients using Piritramide-PCA complained of higher pain sores than those in the standard group (6.90 (± 2.34) vs. 4.83 (± 2.87), (p &lt; 0.05)). In both groups the level of satisfaction with the analgesia received was comparable (8.00 (± 2.45) vs 7.67 (± 2.62), (p = 0.7)). Patients in the PCA group suffered more nausea (63.2 % vs 30 % respectively, OR 4.0, 95 % CI 1.05–15.20, p &lt; 0.05) and expressed more the desire for more analgesic support compared to the control group (OR 5.7 (1–33.25), p = 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Women with abortion induction after 14 weeks of gestation suffer from relevant severe pain, which requires adequate therapy. However, addition of PCA does not seem to bring any advantage in patients undergoing this procedure.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590161323000765\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590161323000765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估在常规条件下使用自动泵系统实施患者自控镇痛(PCA)是否能有效减轻晚期人工流产诱导的疼痛德国波恩大学医院产科和产前医学部。方法在常规条件下,与以前护士控制的曲马多标准相比,PCA系统实施后疼痛管理的评估。患者回答了一份经过验证的疼痛问卷,并评估了对救援止痛药的需求。疼痛强度和满意度采用10分数字评定量表进行测量。主要结果测量最大疼痛强度结果纳入40例患者。使用Piritramide PCA的患者的疼痛疼痛程度高于标准组(6.90(±2.34)vs.4.83(±2.87),(p<0.05))。两组对镇痛的满意度相当(8.00(±2.45)vs.7.67(±2.62),(p=0.7)。与对照组相比,PCA组患者恶心程度更高(分别为63.2%和30%,OR 4.0,95%CI 1.05–15.20,p<;0.05),并表达了更多对镇痛支持的渴望(OR 5.7(1–33.25),p=0.05)。然而,PCA的添加似乎对接受该手术的患者没有任何好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of a piritramide based patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) as a standard of care for pain control in late abortion induction: A prospective cohort study from a patient perspective

Objective

To assess whether the implementation of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with piritramide using an automatic pump system under routine conditions is effective to reduce pain in late abortion inductions

Study design

Prospective observational cohort study

Setting

Patients requiring medically indicated abortion induction from 14 weeks of pregnancy onwards between July 2019 and July 2020 at the department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine of the Bonn University Hospital in Germany.

Methods

Evaluation of pain management after implementation of a PCA system compared with previous nurse-controlled tramadol-based standard under routine conditions. Patients answered a validated pain questionnaire and requirement of rescue analgesics was assessed. Pain intensity and satisfaction were measured on a ten-point numeric rating scale. Main Outcome Measure Maximal pain intensity

Results

Forty patients were included. Patients using Piritramide-PCA complained of higher pain sores than those in the standard group (6.90 (± 2.34) vs. 4.83 (± 2.87), (p < 0.05)). In both groups the level of satisfaction with the analgesia received was comparable (8.00 (± 2.45) vs 7.67 (± 2.62), (p = 0.7)). Patients in the PCA group suffered more nausea (63.2 % vs 30 % respectively, OR 4.0, 95 % CI 1.05–15.20, p < 0.05) and expressed more the desire for more analgesic support compared to the control group (OR 5.7 (1–33.25), p = 0.05).

Conclusion

Women with abortion induction after 14 weeks of gestation suffer from relevant severe pain, which requires adequate therapy. However, addition of PCA does not seem to bring any advantage in patients undergoing this procedure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
58 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信