使用新技术打破中风后失语症患者的沟通障碍

Q3 Nursing
Eloy Jesús Ferrete Ruíz, María de los Reyes de Torres Chacón, Soledad Perez Sánchez, Ana Domínguez Mayoral, Miguel Ángel Gamero García, Ana Barragan Prieto, Lidia Ruiz Bayo, Helena Briales Grzib, Joan Montaner Villalonga
{"title":"使用新技术打破中风后失语症患者的沟通障碍","authors":"Eloy Jesús Ferrete Ruíz,&nbsp;María de los Reyes de Torres Chacón,&nbsp;Soledad Perez Sánchez,&nbsp;Ana Domínguez Mayoral,&nbsp;Miguel Ángel Gamero García,&nbsp;Ana Barragan Prieto,&nbsp;Lidia Ruiz Bayo,&nbsp;Helena Briales Grzib,&nbsp;Joan Montaner Villalonga","doi":"10.1016/j.sedene.2022.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To improve language in aphasic patients after a recent ischaemic stroke using computer applications for mobile devices (tablet) for 30<!--> <!-->days and to establish whether length of use influences this improvement.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Randomised, prospective, single-centre clinical trial with two intervention groups, one of which was a control group. Aphasic patients were included within a maximum of 7<!--> <!-->days after an ischaemic stroke. The intervention group used tablet-specific software for 30<!--> <!-->days. Language improvement was assessed using the Mississippi Aphasia Screening Test (MAST).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The sample was 40<!--> <!-->patients, mean age 73<!--> <!-->years (±<!--> <!-->10.2). Fifty percent were women. Patients were equally divided between the 2 groups. Mean device use was 311.8 (±<!--> <!-->334.6) minutes after the end of 30<!--> <!-->days, with a final mean improvement in MAST of 46.5 (±<!--> <!-->22.3) points in the intervention group and 34.8 (±<!--> <!-->21.7) in the control group (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.233). Adjusting for age, the results indicate that the patients who tend to improve the most are those under 65<!--> <!-->years of age (43.8 [±<!--> <!-->30.5] points, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.205). We were unable to demonstrate significant differences between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results obtained in the study suggest that new technologies can be an effective tool for language recovery, especially in young patients. Multicentre studies with a larger sample size and younger patients may be able to demonstrate the usefulness of this new tool.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38763,"journal":{"name":"Revista Cientifica de la Sociedad Espanola de Enfermeria Neurologica","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 14-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rompiendo la barrera comunicativa mediante el uso de nuevas tecnologías en pacientes afásicos tras un ictus\",\"authors\":\"Eloy Jesús Ferrete Ruíz,&nbsp;María de los Reyes de Torres Chacón,&nbsp;Soledad Perez Sánchez,&nbsp;Ana Domínguez Mayoral,&nbsp;Miguel Ángel Gamero García,&nbsp;Ana Barragan Prieto,&nbsp;Lidia Ruiz Bayo,&nbsp;Helena Briales Grzib,&nbsp;Joan Montaner Villalonga\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sedene.2022.03.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To improve language in aphasic patients after a recent ischaemic stroke using computer applications for mobile devices (tablet) for 30<!--> <!-->days and to establish whether length of use influences this improvement.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Randomised, prospective, single-centre clinical trial with two intervention groups, one of which was a control group. Aphasic patients were included within a maximum of 7<!--> <!-->days after an ischaemic stroke. The intervention group used tablet-specific software for 30<!--> <!-->days. Language improvement was assessed using the Mississippi Aphasia Screening Test (MAST).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The sample was 40<!--> <!-->patients, mean age 73<!--> <!-->years (±<!--> <!-->10.2). Fifty percent were women. Patients were equally divided between the 2 groups. Mean device use was 311.8 (±<!--> <!-->334.6) minutes after the end of 30<!--> <!-->days, with a final mean improvement in MAST of 46.5 (±<!--> <!-->22.3) points in the intervention group and 34.8 (±<!--> <!-->21.7) in the control group (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.233). Adjusting for age, the results indicate that the patients who tend to improve the most are those under 65<!--> <!-->years of age (43.8 [±<!--> <!-->30.5] points, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.205). We were unable to demonstrate significant differences between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results obtained in the study suggest that new technologies can be an effective tool for language recovery, especially in young patients. Multicentre studies with a larger sample size and younger patients may be able to demonstrate the usefulness of this new tool.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Cientifica de la Sociedad Espanola de Enfermeria Neurologica\",\"volume\":\"58 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 14-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Cientifica de la Sociedad Espanola de Enfermeria Neurologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2013524622000046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Cientifica de la Sociedad Espanola de Enfermeria Neurologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2013524622000046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的使用移动设备(平板电脑)的计算机应用程序30天来改善最近缺血性中风后失语症患者的语言,并确定使用时间是否会影响这种改善。方法随机、前瞻性、单中心临床试验,分为两个干预组,其中一个为对照组。失语症患者被纳入缺血性中风后最多7天内。干预组使用平板电脑专用软件30天。采用密西西比失语症筛查测试(MAST)评估语言改善情况。结果样本为40名患者,平均年龄73岁(±10.2)。50%为女性。患者在两组之间平均分配。30天后,平均使用器械311.8(±334.6)分钟,干预组和对照组的MAST最终平均改善46.5(±22.3)分和34.8(±21.7)分(P=.233),结果表明,65岁以下的患者病情改善最为明显(43.8[±30.5]分,P=0.05)。我们无法证明两组之间的显著差异。结论研究结果表明,新技术可以成为语言恢复的有效工具,尤其是在年轻患者中。具有更大样本量和更年轻患者的多中心研究可能能够证明这种新工具的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rompiendo la barrera comunicativa mediante el uso de nuevas tecnologías en pacientes afásicos tras un ictus

Objectives

To improve language in aphasic patients after a recent ischaemic stroke using computer applications for mobile devices (tablet) for 30 days and to establish whether length of use influences this improvement.

Method

Randomised, prospective, single-centre clinical trial with two intervention groups, one of which was a control group. Aphasic patients were included within a maximum of 7 days after an ischaemic stroke. The intervention group used tablet-specific software for 30 days. Language improvement was assessed using the Mississippi Aphasia Screening Test (MAST).

Results

The sample was 40 patients, mean age 73 years (± 10.2). Fifty percent were women. Patients were equally divided between the 2 groups. Mean device use was 311.8 (± 334.6) minutes after the end of 30 days, with a final mean improvement in MAST of 46.5 (± 22.3) points in the intervention group and 34.8 (± 21.7) in the control group (P = .233). Adjusting for age, the results indicate that the patients who tend to improve the most are those under 65 years of age (43.8 [± 30.5] points, P = .205). We were unable to demonstrate significant differences between the two groups.

Conclusions

The results obtained in the study suggest that new technologies can be an effective tool for language recovery, especially in young patients. Multicentre studies with a larger sample size and younger patients may be able to demonstrate the usefulness of this new tool.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信