理解文本复杂性对政府沟通的影响:来自中国在线公共服务平台的洞察

IF 7.6 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Liangdong Lu , Jia Xu , Jiuchang Wei
{"title":"理解文本复杂性对政府沟通的影响:来自中国在线公共服务平台的洞察","authors":"Liangdong Lu ,&nbsp;Jia Xu ,&nbsp;Jiuchang Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.tele.2023.102028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While texts are the primary carriers of information for government decision making, few studies have examined the role of textual complexity in government-citizen communication. Using a variety of natural language processing methods, this paper measured textual complexity from the perspectives of word complexity, logical complexity, and abnormal negative emotion based on the textual data of the 1.15 million online messages left by the citizens to government leaders on China’s online public service platform, and explored its impact on government responses. Based on the Double-hurdle model, this paper found that the government response can be composed of two decision-making processes: response-intention, which indicates whether to respond, and response-level, which represents the extent of response. For response-intention decision-making, the simpler the words and logic of the message, the more likely it is to receive a reply from the government. For response-level decision-making, messages with more complex words and logic received a higher level of government response. Abnormal negative emotion in the message significantly reduced the government’s response intention and response level, and the negative effect of abnormal negative emotion on response intention was much greater than on the response level. This study not only helps to understand how the government makes decisions based on textual information, but also has important value for responsive government construction and equalization of government services.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48257,"journal":{"name":"Telematics and Informatics","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 102028"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the effects of the textual complexity on government communication: Insights from China’s online public service platform\",\"authors\":\"Liangdong Lu ,&nbsp;Jia Xu ,&nbsp;Jiuchang Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tele.2023.102028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>While texts are the primary carriers of information for government decision making, few studies have examined the role of textual complexity in government-citizen communication. Using a variety of natural language processing methods, this paper measured textual complexity from the perspectives of word complexity, logical complexity, and abnormal negative emotion based on the textual data of the 1.15 million online messages left by the citizens to government leaders on China’s online public service platform, and explored its impact on government responses. Based on the Double-hurdle model, this paper found that the government response can be composed of two decision-making processes: response-intention, which indicates whether to respond, and response-level, which represents the extent of response. For response-intention decision-making, the simpler the words and logic of the message, the more likely it is to receive a reply from the government. For response-level decision-making, messages with more complex words and logic received a higher level of government response. Abnormal negative emotion in the message significantly reduced the government’s response intention and response level, and the negative effect of abnormal negative emotion on response intention was much greater than on the response level. This study not only helps to understand how the government makes decisions based on textual information, but also has important value for responsive government construction and equalization of government services.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telematics and Informatics\",\"volume\":\"83 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102028\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telematics and Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585323000928\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telematics and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585323000928","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

虽然文本是政府决策的主要信息载体,但很少有研究考察文本复杂性在政府与公民沟通中的作用。本文采用多种自然语言处理方法,基于中国在线公共服务平台上115万条公民给政府领导人的在线信息的文本数据,从词语复杂性、逻辑复杂性和异常负面情绪角度测量了文本复杂性,并探讨了其对政府回应的影响。基于双障碍模型,本文发现政府反应可以由两个决策过程组成:反应意图,表示是否反应;反应水平,表示反应程度。对于回应意向决策,信息的措辞和逻辑越简单,就越有可能收到政府的回复。对于响应级别的决策,措辞和逻辑更复杂的信息得到了更高级别的政府响应。信息中的异常负面情绪显著降低了政府的响应意愿和响应水平,且异常负面情绪对响应意愿的负面影响远大于对响应水平的负面影响。本研究不仅有助于理解政府如何根据文本信息做出决策,而且对响应型政府建设和政府服务均等化具有重要价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding the effects of the textual complexity on government communication: Insights from China’s online public service platform

While texts are the primary carriers of information for government decision making, few studies have examined the role of textual complexity in government-citizen communication. Using a variety of natural language processing methods, this paper measured textual complexity from the perspectives of word complexity, logical complexity, and abnormal negative emotion based on the textual data of the 1.15 million online messages left by the citizens to government leaders on China’s online public service platform, and explored its impact on government responses. Based on the Double-hurdle model, this paper found that the government response can be composed of two decision-making processes: response-intention, which indicates whether to respond, and response-level, which represents the extent of response. For response-intention decision-making, the simpler the words and logic of the message, the more likely it is to receive a reply from the government. For response-level decision-making, messages with more complex words and logic received a higher level of government response. Abnormal negative emotion in the message significantly reduced the government’s response intention and response level, and the negative effect of abnormal negative emotion on response intention was much greater than on the response level. This study not only helps to understand how the government makes decisions based on textual information, but also has important value for responsive government construction and equalization of government services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Telematics and Informatics
Telematics and Informatics INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Telematics and Informatics is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes cutting-edge theoretical and methodological research exploring the social, economic, geographic, political, and cultural impacts of digital technologies. It covers various application areas, such as smart cities, sensors, information fusion, digital society, IoT, cyber-physical technologies, privacy, knowledge management, distributed work, emergency response, mobile communications, health informatics, social media's psychosocial effects, ICT for sustainable development, blockchain, e-commerce, and e-government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信