基于接受度的糖尿病教育(ACT-DE)计划对2型糖尿病患者糖尿病困扰和自我护理行为的初步疗效:一项试点随机对照试验

IF 3.4 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Hau Yi Ngan , Yuen Yu Chong , Kit Man Loo , Wai Tong Chien
{"title":"基于接受度的糖尿病教育(ACT-DE)计划对2型糖尿病患者糖尿病困扰和自我护理行为的初步疗效:一项试点随机对照试验","authors":"Hau Yi Ngan ,&nbsp;Yuen Yu Chong ,&nbsp;Kit Man Loo ,&nbsp;Wai Tong Chien","doi":"10.1016/j.jcbs.2023.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Diabetes distress is often characterised by aversive feelings about diabetes and avoidance of diabetes self-care, leading to suboptimal blood glucose<span><span> control, diabetes complications and depression. Evidence from a recent review has indicated the potential efficacy of acceptance-based diabetic self-management programmes for improving blood glucose levels and </span>mental health outcomes by fostering psychological flexibility.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a two-arm and assessor-blinded pilot randomised controlled trial<span> (RCT) with 48 participants aged 18–64 with type 2 diabetes and moderate distress levels, in which we compared a 6-week acceptance and commitment therapy and diabetes education (ACT-DE) programme intervention with diabetes education. Diabetes distress (the primary outcome), self-care behaviour, self-efficacy in diabetes management, and psychological inflexibility were measured at baseline and post-intervention. Focus group interviews were conducted to explore the intervention group's perceptions of the benefits and limitations of the intervention.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Results of ANCOVA test showed that the intervention group exhibited significantly greater decrease in diabetes distress (effect size [Cohen's </span><em>d</em>] = 0.65), and increase in exercise frequency (<em>d</em> = 1.16), and foot-care frequency (<em>d</em><span> = 0.59) than the diabetes education group. The qualitative feedback of the intervention group revealed that the learnt ACT skills can be effectively applied in self-care and highlighted the utility of some of the intervention's therapeutic components, primarily mindfulness practices, metaphors, and interactive diabetes education. The intervention was well-accepted, with an 87.5% completion rate, but caution is needed due to a low recruitment rate (28.1%) during COVID-19 pandemic peak.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This pilot study confirmed that ACT-DE programme is an acceptable intervention for people with type 2 diabetes. It demonstrated preliminary efficacy with medium-to-large effect sizes in alleviating the participants’ diabetes distress and improving their self-care. Recruitment strategies can be improved to enhance the feasibility. Moreover, a full-scale RCT with longer-term follow-up is warranted to examine the intervention effects on diabetes distress, blood glucose control and other health outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","volume":"30 ","pages":"Pages 50-60"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preliminary efficacy of an acceptance-based diabetes education (ACT-DE) programme for people with type 2 diabetes on diabetes distress and self-care behaviours: A pilot randomised controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Hau Yi Ngan ,&nbsp;Yuen Yu Chong ,&nbsp;Kit Man Loo ,&nbsp;Wai Tong Chien\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcbs.2023.09.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Diabetes distress is often characterised by aversive feelings about diabetes and avoidance of diabetes self-care, leading to suboptimal blood glucose<span><span> control, diabetes complications and depression. Evidence from a recent review has indicated the potential efficacy of acceptance-based diabetic self-management programmes for improving blood glucose levels and </span>mental health outcomes by fostering psychological flexibility.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a two-arm and assessor-blinded pilot randomised controlled trial<span> (RCT) with 48 participants aged 18–64 with type 2 diabetes and moderate distress levels, in which we compared a 6-week acceptance and commitment therapy and diabetes education (ACT-DE) programme intervention with diabetes education. Diabetes distress (the primary outcome), self-care behaviour, self-efficacy in diabetes management, and psychological inflexibility were measured at baseline and post-intervention. Focus group interviews were conducted to explore the intervention group's perceptions of the benefits and limitations of the intervention.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Results of ANCOVA test showed that the intervention group exhibited significantly greater decrease in diabetes distress (effect size [Cohen's </span><em>d</em>] = 0.65), and increase in exercise frequency (<em>d</em> = 1.16), and foot-care frequency (<em>d</em><span> = 0.59) than the diabetes education group. The qualitative feedback of the intervention group revealed that the learnt ACT skills can be effectively applied in self-care and highlighted the utility of some of the intervention's therapeutic components, primarily mindfulness practices, metaphors, and interactive diabetes education. The intervention was well-accepted, with an 87.5% completion rate, but caution is needed due to a low recruitment rate (28.1%) during COVID-19 pandemic peak.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This pilot study confirmed that ACT-DE programme is an acceptable intervention for people with type 2 diabetes. It demonstrated preliminary efficacy with medium-to-large effect sizes in alleviating the participants’ diabetes distress and improving their self-care. Recruitment strategies can be improved to enhance the feasibility. Moreover, a full-scale RCT with longer-term follow-up is warranted to examine the intervention effects on diabetes distress, blood glucose control and other health outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 50-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144723001114\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144723001114","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景糖尿病的痛苦通常表现为对糖尿病的厌恶感和对糖尿病自我护理的回避,导致血糖控制不理想、糖尿病并发症和抑郁。最近一项综述的证据表明,基于接受的糖尿病自我管理计划通过培养心理灵活性来改善血糖水平和心理健康结果,具有潜在的疗效。方法我们对48名年龄在18-64岁、患有2型糖尿病和中度痛苦水平的参与者进行了一项双臂和评估者盲的试点随机对照试验(RCT),其中我们将为期6周的接受和承诺治疗和糖尿病教育(ACT-DE)计划干预与糖尿病教育进行了比较。在基线和干预后测量糖尿病困扰(主要结果)、自我护理行为、糖尿病管理中的自我效能感和心理灵活性。进行焦点小组访谈,探讨干预组对干预的益处和局限性的看法。结果ANCOVA测试结果显示,与糖尿病教育组相比,干预组在糖尿病困扰(效应大小[Chen's d]=0.65)、运动频率(d=1.16)和足部护理频率(d=0.59)方面表现出显著的下降。干预组的定性反馈显示,所学的ACT技能可以有效地应用于自我护理,并强调了干预的一些治疗成分的效用,主要是正念练习、隐喻和互动糖尿病教育。干预措施被广泛接受,完成率为87.5%,但由于新冠肺炎疫情高峰期间招募率较低(28.1%),需要谨慎。结论本试验研究证实,ACT-DE方案是2型糖尿病患者可接受的干预措施。它在减轻参与者的糖尿病困扰和改善他们的自我护理方面显示了中等到大的初步疗效。可以改进招聘策略以提高可行性。此外,有必要进行全面的随机对照试验和长期随访,以检查干预对糖尿病困扰、血糖控制和其他健康结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preliminary efficacy of an acceptance-based diabetes education (ACT-DE) programme for people with type 2 diabetes on diabetes distress and self-care behaviours: A pilot randomised controlled trial

Background

Diabetes distress is often characterised by aversive feelings about diabetes and avoidance of diabetes self-care, leading to suboptimal blood glucose control, diabetes complications and depression. Evidence from a recent review has indicated the potential efficacy of acceptance-based diabetic self-management programmes for improving blood glucose levels and mental health outcomes by fostering psychological flexibility.

Methods

We conducted a two-arm and assessor-blinded pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) with 48 participants aged 18–64 with type 2 diabetes and moderate distress levels, in which we compared a 6-week acceptance and commitment therapy and diabetes education (ACT-DE) programme intervention with diabetes education. Diabetes distress (the primary outcome), self-care behaviour, self-efficacy in diabetes management, and psychological inflexibility were measured at baseline and post-intervention. Focus group interviews were conducted to explore the intervention group's perceptions of the benefits and limitations of the intervention.

Results

Results of ANCOVA test showed that the intervention group exhibited significantly greater decrease in diabetes distress (effect size [Cohen's d] = 0.65), and increase in exercise frequency (d = 1.16), and foot-care frequency (d = 0.59) than the diabetes education group. The qualitative feedback of the intervention group revealed that the learnt ACT skills can be effectively applied in self-care and highlighted the utility of some of the intervention's therapeutic components, primarily mindfulness practices, metaphors, and interactive diabetes education. The intervention was well-accepted, with an 87.5% completion rate, but caution is needed due to a low recruitment rate (28.1%) during COVID-19 pandemic peak.

Conclusion

This pilot study confirmed that ACT-DE programme is an acceptable intervention for people with type 2 diabetes. It demonstrated preliminary efficacy with medium-to-large effect sizes in alleviating the participants’ diabetes distress and improving their self-care. Recruitment strategies can be improved to enhance the feasibility. Moreover, a full-scale RCT with longer-term follow-up is warranted to examine the intervention effects on diabetes distress, blood glucose control and other health outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
18.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science is the official journal of the Association for Contextual Behavioral Science (ACBS). Contextual Behavioral Science is a systematic and pragmatic approach to the understanding of behavior, the solution of human problems, and the promotion of human growth and development. Contextual Behavioral Science uses functional principles and theories to analyze and modify action embedded in its historical and situational context. The goal is to predict and influence behavior, with precision, scope, and depth, across all behavioral domains and all levels of analysis, so as to help create a behavioral science that is more adequate to the challenge of the human condition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信