{"title":"环境监管的阴暗面:工资不平等成本","authors":"Yun Liu , Yifei Zhang , Yuxin Yang , Xin Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jce.2022.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Environmental regulations have both bright and dark consequences, and understanding the dark side is critical for policymakers. This paper investigates whether and how environmental regulation exacerbates the wage inequality between skilled and unskilled labor. Employing a triple difference-in-differences (DDD) estimation method on Chinese urban household survey data, we find a 1.7% increase in the wage gap after the implementation of a regional-specific environmental regulation. We show that the enlarged wage gap is mainly due to the intensive margin’s change and is dominated by the polluting sector rather than the non-polluting one. More importantly, the unappealing effect on wage inequality lasts in the long run and is not China-specific, according to our numerical simulation of a general equilibrium model. Finally, we also propose a non-environmental policy instrument to alleviate the negative impact. Overall, our work highlights that environmental regulation may have an unintended wage inequality cost, and our study is of generic policy implications to other economies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48183,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dark side of environmental regulation: Wage inequality cost\",\"authors\":\"Yun Liu , Yifei Zhang , Yuxin Yang , Xin Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jce.2022.11.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Environmental regulations have both bright and dark consequences, and understanding the dark side is critical for policymakers. This paper investigates whether and how environmental regulation exacerbates the wage inequality between skilled and unskilled labor. Employing a triple difference-in-differences (DDD) estimation method on Chinese urban household survey data, we find a 1.7% increase in the wage gap after the implementation of a regional-specific environmental regulation. We show that the enlarged wage gap is mainly due to the intensive margin’s change and is dominated by the polluting sector rather than the non-polluting one. More importantly, the unappealing effect on wage inequality lasts in the long run and is not China-specific, according to our numerical simulation of a general equilibrium model. Finally, we also propose a non-environmental policy instrument to alleviate the negative impact. Overall, our work highlights that environmental regulation may have an unintended wage inequality cost, and our study is of generic policy implications to other economies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Comparative Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Comparative Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147596722000865\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comparative Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147596722000865","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dark side of environmental regulation: Wage inequality cost
Environmental regulations have both bright and dark consequences, and understanding the dark side is critical for policymakers. This paper investigates whether and how environmental regulation exacerbates the wage inequality between skilled and unskilled labor. Employing a triple difference-in-differences (DDD) estimation method on Chinese urban household survey data, we find a 1.7% increase in the wage gap after the implementation of a regional-specific environmental regulation. We show that the enlarged wage gap is mainly due to the intensive margin’s change and is dominated by the polluting sector rather than the non-polluting one. More importantly, the unappealing effect on wage inequality lasts in the long run and is not China-specific, according to our numerical simulation of a general equilibrium model. Finally, we also propose a non-environmental policy instrument to alleviate the negative impact. Overall, our work highlights that environmental regulation may have an unintended wage inequality cost, and our study is of generic policy implications to other economies.
期刊介绍:
The mission of the Journal of Comparative Economics is to lead the new orientations of research in comparative economics. Before 1989, the core of comparative economics was the comparison of economic systems with in particular the economic analysis of socialism in its different forms. In the last fifteen years, the main focus of interest of comparative economists has been the transition from socialism to capitalism.