建立用于持续风险管理过程的风险矩阵标准准则

IF 1 Q3 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE
David M. Lengyel , Thomas A. Mazzuchi , William E. Vesely
{"title":"建立用于持续风险管理过程的风险矩阵标准准则","authors":"David M. Lengyel ,&nbsp;Thomas A. Mazzuchi ,&nbsp;William E. Vesely","doi":"10.1016/j.jsse.2023.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Over the past 30 years, an extensive knowledge-base in the construction and utilization of risk matrices<span> to score and rank risks has been accumulated. Still, within the domain of the continuous risk management (CRM) process, key issues associated with risk matrices have produced divergent schools of thought: a utilitarian focus among practitioners, and a more theoretical, and sometimes abstract, focus among the academic community. This research will examine CRM practices in human space flight at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), including many of their aerospace contractors, to assess the key factors in the construction and use of risk matrices. The </span></span>intent here is to begin to merge the knowledge between these communities in an effort to support a research agenda to improve the construction and use of risk matrices going forward.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37283,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Space Safety Engineering","volume":"10 3","pages":"Pages 276-283"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing risk matrix standard criteria for use in the continuous risk management process\",\"authors\":\"David M. Lengyel ,&nbsp;Thomas A. Mazzuchi ,&nbsp;William E. Vesely\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsse.2023.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Over the past 30 years, an extensive knowledge-base in the construction and utilization of risk matrices<span> to score and rank risks has been accumulated. Still, within the domain of the continuous risk management (CRM) process, key issues associated with risk matrices have produced divergent schools of thought: a utilitarian focus among practitioners, and a more theoretical, and sometimes abstract, focus among the academic community. This research will examine CRM practices in human space flight at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), including many of their aerospace contractors, to assess the key factors in the construction and use of risk matrices. The </span></span>intent here is to begin to merge the knowledge between these communities in an effort to support a research agenda to improve the construction and use of risk matrices going forward.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Space Safety Engineering\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 276-283\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Space Safety Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468896723000411\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Space Safety Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468896723000411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去的30年里,在构建和利用风险矩阵对风险进行评分和排序方面积累了丰富的知识库。尽管如此,在持续风险管理(CRM)过程的领域内,与风险矩阵相关的关键问题产生了不同的学派:从业者关注的是功利主义,学术界关注的是更理论的,有时是抽象的。这项研究将考察美国国家航空航天局(NASA)和美国国防部(DoD)在人类太空飞行中的CRM实践,包括他们的许多航空航天承包商,以评估风险矩阵构建和使用中的关键因素。这里的目的是开始合并这些社区之间的知识,以支持研究议程,从而改进未来风险矩阵的构建和使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Establishing risk matrix standard criteria for use in the continuous risk management process

Over the past 30 years, an extensive knowledge-base in the construction and utilization of risk matrices to score and rank risks has been accumulated. Still, within the domain of the continuous risk management (CRM) process, key issues associated with risk matrices have produced divergent schools of thought: a utilitarian focus among practitioners, and a more theoretical, and sometimes abstract, focus among the academic community. This research will examine CRM practices in human space flight at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), including many of their aerospace contractors, to assess the key factors in the construction and use of risk matrices. The intent here is to begin to merge the knowledge between these communities in an effort to support a research agenda to improve the construction and use of risk matrices going forward.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Space Safety Engineering
Journal of Space Safety Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信