低倍率窄带成像在胃肿瘤年度内镜筛查中的有效性:一项病例对照研究

Ryuichi Nagashima
{"title":"低倍率窄带成像在胃肿瘤年度内镜筛查中的有效性:一项病例对照研究","authors":"Ryuichi Nagashima","doi":"10.1016/j.gande.2023.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Previously, I have reported the efficacy of whole stomach observation using magnifying narrow-band imaging at low magnification (LM-NBI) after routine white-light imaging (WLI). LM-NBI can detect lesions overlooked by WLI. However, the effectiveness of annual examinations remains unexplored. I conducted this case-control study at a single institution. In LM-NBI group, patients with chronic gastritis underwent a LM-NBI scan, defined as the minimal magnification offering maximal visual field coverage to unveil to the microsurface pattern of gastric mucosa, of the whole stomach following WLI. Historical control was used as the conventional magnifying endoscopy (CE) group. In both groups, index endoscopy, which equalizes the status, was performed first, and subsequently annually endoscopies up to five times were conducted. The first annual examination was performed from April 2019 to March 2020 in LM-NBI group and from April 2015 to March 2016 in CE group. The detection of gastric neoplasia was analyzed according to medical records. Among 388 patients in the LM-NBI group, and 381 in the CE group, 15 and 5 patients with gastric neoplasia were respectively identified. Except for one mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, all were epithelial neoplasias. All endoscopic examinations were performed safely without complications which needed additional medical interventions. Through a Cox proportional hazards model, the hazard ratio of 2.78 (95% CE, 1.01–7.64) was determined. Kaplan–Meier analysis (p ​= ​0.039, log-rank test) revealed superior efficacy of annual LM-NBI over CE in detecting gastric neoplasia. This is the first study to report the efficacy of annual endoscopy using LM-NBI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100571,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology & Endoscopy","volume":"1 4","pages":"Pages 183-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of low-magnification narrow-band imaging in annual endoscopy screening for gastric neoplasms: A case-control study\",\"authors\":\"Ryuichi Nagashima\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gande.2023.10.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Previously, I have reported the efficacy of whole stomach observation using magnifying narrow-band imaging at low magnification (LM-NBI) after routine white-light imaging (WLI). LM-NBI can detect lesions overlooked by WLI. However, the effectiveness of annual examinations remains unexplored. I conducted this case-control study at a single institution. In LM-NBI group, patients with chronic gastritis underwent a LM-NBI scan, defined as the minimal magnification offering maximal visual field coverage to unveil to the microsurface pattern of gastric mucosa, of the whole stomach following WLI. Historical control was used as the conventional magnifying endoscopy (CE) group. In both groups, index endoscopy, which equalizes the status, was performed first, and subsequently annually endoscopies up to five times were conducted. The first annual examination was performed from April 2019 to March 2020 in LM-NBI group and from April 2015 to March 2016 in CE group. The detection of gastric neoplasia was analyzed according to medical records. Among 388 patients in the LM-NBI group, and 381 in the CE group, 15 and 5 patients with gastric neoplasia were respectively identified. Except for one mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, all were epithelial neoplasias. All endoscopic examinations were performed safely without complications which needed additional medical interventions. Through a Cox proportional hazards model, the hazard ratio of 2.78 (95% CE, 1.01–7.64) was determined. Kaplan–Meier analysis (p ​= ​0.039, log-rank test) revealed superior efficacy of annual LM-NBI over CE in detecting gastric neoplasia. This is the first study to report the efficacy of annual endoscopy using LM-NBI.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastroenterology & Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"1 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 183-189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastroenterology & Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949752323000511\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology & Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949752323000511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以前,我已经报道了在常规白光成像(WLI)之后,使用低放大率放大窄带成像(LM-NBI)进行全胃观察的疗效。LM-NBI可以检测WLI忽略的病变。然而,年度考试的有效性仍未得到探索。我在一家机构进行了这项病例对照研究。在LM-NBI组中,慢性胃炎患者接受LM-NBI扫描,定义为WLI后提供最大视野覆盖的最小放大率,以揭示整个胃的胃粘膜微表面模式。使用历史对照作为常规放大内窥镜检查(CE)组。在这两组患者中,首先进行指数内镜检查,以平衡状态,随后每年进行多达五次内镜检查。LM-NBI组于2019年4月至2020年3月进行了第一次年度检查,CE组于2015年4月和2016年3月分别进行了第一项年度检查。根据病历分析胃肿瘤的检出情况。在LM-NBI组的388名患者和CE组的381名患者中,分别鉴定出15名和5名胃肿瘤患者。除1例粘膜相关淋巴组织淋巴瘤外,其余均为上皮性肿瘤。所有内镜检查均安全进行,无需额外医疗干预的并发症。通过Cox比例风险模型,确定了2.78(95%CE,1.01-7.64)的风险比。Kaplan–Meier分析(p​=​0.039,log秩检验)显示年度LM-NBI在检测胃肿瘤方面优于CE的疗效。这是第一项报告使用LM-NBI进行年度内窥镜检查的疗效的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity of low-magnification narrow-band imaging in annual endoscopy screening for gastric neoplasms: A case-control study

Previously, I have reported the efficacy of whole stomach observation using magnifying narrow-band imaging at low magnification (LM-NBI) after routine white-light imaging (WLI). LM-NBI can detect lesions overlooked by WLI. However, the effectiveness of annual examinations remains unexplored. I conducted this case-control study at a single institution. In LM-NBI group, patients with chronic gastritis underwent a LM-NBI scan, defined as the minimal magnification offering maximal visual field coverage to unveil to the microsurface pattern of gastric mucosa, of the whole stomach following WLI. Historical control was used as the conventional magnifying endoscopy (CE) group. In both groups, index endoscopy, which equalizes the status, was performed first, and subsequently annually endoscopies up to five times were conducted. The first annual examination was performed from April 2019 to March 2020 in LM-NBI group and from April 2015 to March 2016 in CE group. The detection of gastric neoplasia was analyzed according to medical records. Among 388 patients in the LM-NBI group, and 381 in the CE group, 15 and 5 patients with gastric neoplasia were respectively identified. Except for one mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, all were epithelial neoplasias. All endoscopic examinations were performed safely without complications which needed additional medical interventions. Through a Cox proportional hazards model, the hazard ratio of 2.78 (95% CE, 1.01–7.64) was determined. Kaplan–Meier analysis (p ​= ​0.039, log-rank test) revealed superior efficacy of annual LM-NBI over CE in detecting gastric neoplasia. This is the first study to report the efficacy of annual endoscopy using LM-NBI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信