土壤安全评价建议:土壤功能、土壤服务和对土壤的威胁

Sandra J. Evangelista, Damien J. Field, Alex B. McBratney, Budiman Minasny, Wartini Ng, José Padarian, Mercedes Román Dobarco, Alexandre M.J.-C. Wadoux
{"title":"土壤安全评价建议:土壤功能、土壤服务和对土壤的威胁","authors":"Sandra J. Evangelista,&nbsp;Damien J. Field,&nbsp;Alex B. McBratney,&nbsp;Budiman Minasny,&nbsp;Wartini Ng,&nbsp;José Padarian,&nbsp;Mercedes Román Dobarco,&nbsp;Alexandre M.J.-C. Wadoux","doi":"10.1016/j.soisec.2023.100086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Human societies face six existential challenges to their sustainable development. These challenges have been previously addressed by a myriad of concepts such as soil conservation, soil quality, and soil health. Yet, of these, only soil security attempts to integrate the six existential challenges concurrently through the five biophysical and socio-economic dimensions of capacity, condition, capital, connectivity and codification. In this paper, we highlight past and existing concepts, and make a proposal for a provisional assessment of soil security. The proposal addresses three roles of soil: soil functions, soil services and threats to soil. For each identified role, we indicate a potential, but not exhaustive, list of indicators that characterise the five dimensions of soil security. We also raise issues of quantification and combination of indicators briefly. We found that capacity and condition are theoretically easier to measure and quantify than connectivity and codification. The dimension capital might be conveniently assessed using indicators that relate to the economic value of soils. The next step is to test this proposal for which we make recommendations on potential study cases and examples. We conclude that the five dimensions of soil security can potentially be assessed quantitatively and comprehensively using indicators that characterise each role, but also found that there is need for further work to devise an operational measurement methodology to estimate connectivity of people to soil.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74839,"journal":{"name":"Soil security","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100086"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A proposal for the assessment of soil security: Soil functions, soil services and threats to soil\",\"authors\":\"Sandra J. Evangelista,&nbsp;Damien J. Field,&nbsp;Alex B. McBratney,&nbsp;Budiman Minasny,&nbsp;Wartini Ng,&nbsp;José Padarian,&nbsp;Mercedes Román Dobarco,&nbsp;Alexandre M.J.-C. Wadoux\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soisec.2023.100086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Human societies face six existential challenges to their sustainable development. These challenges have been previously addressed by a myriad of concepts such as soil conservation, soil quality, and soil health. Yet, of these, only soil security attempts to integrate the six existential challenges concurrently through the five biophysical and socio-economic dimensions of capacity, condition, capital, connectivity and codification. In this paper, we highlight past and existing concepts, and make a proposal for a provisional assessment of soil security. The proposal addresses three roles of soil: soil functions, soil services and threats to soil. For each identified role, we indicate a potential, but not exhaustive, list of indicators that characterise the five dimensions of soil security. We also raise issues of quantification and combination of indicators briefly. We found that capacity and condition are theoretically easier to measure and quantify than connectivity and codification. The dimension capital might be conveniently assessed using indicators that relate to the economic value of soils. The next step is to test this proposal for which we make recommendations on potential study cases and examples. We conclude that the five dimensions of soil security can potentially be assessed quantitatively and comprehensively using indicators that characterise each role, but also found that there is need for further work to devise an operational measurement methodology to estimate connectivity of people to soil.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil security\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100086\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006223000035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006223000035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类社会的可持续发展面临六大生存挑战。这些挑战以前已经通过土壤保护、土壤质量和土壤健康等无数概念来解决。然而,在这些挑战中,只有土壤安全试图通过能力、条件、资本、连通性和编纂这五个生物物理和社会经济层面,同时整合六个生存挑战。在本文中,我们强调了过去和现有的概念,并提出了土壤安全临时评估的建议。该提案涉及土壤的三个作用:土壤功能、土壤服务和对土壤的威胁。对于每一个确定的角色,我们都列出了一份潜在但并非详尽的指标清单,这些指标描述了土壤安全的五个方面。我们还简要提出了指标的量化和组合问题。我们发现,理论上,能力和条件比连通性和编码更容易测量和量化。维度资本可以方便地使用与土壤经济价值相关的指标进行评估。下一步是测试这一建议,我们就潜在的研究案例和例子提出建议。我们得出的结论是,土壤安全的五个维度可以使用每一个角色的特征指标进行定量和全面的评估,但也发现需要进一步的工作来设计一种可操作的测量方法来估计人与土壤的连通性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A proposal for the assessment of soil security: Soil functions, soil services and threats to soil

Human societies face six existential challenges to their sustainable development. These challenges have been previously addressed by a myriad of concepts such as soil conservation, soil quality, and soil health. Yet, of these, only soil security attempts to integrate the six existential challenges concurrently through the five biophysical and socio-economic dimensions of capacity, condition, capital, connectivity and codification. In this paper, we highlight past and existing concepts, and make a proposal for a provisional assessment of soil security. The proposal addresses three roles of soil: soil functions, soil services and threats to soil. For each identified role, we indicate a potential, but not exhaustive, list of indicators that characterise the five dimensions of soil security. We also raise issues of quantification and combination of indicators briefly. We found that capacity and condition are theoretically easier to measure and quantify than connectivity and codification. The dimension capital might be conveniently assessed using indicators that relate to the economic value of soils. The next step is to test this proposal for which we make recommendations on potential study cases and examples. We conclude that the five dimensions of soil security can potentially be assessed quantitatively and comprehensively using indicators that characterise each role, but also found that there is need for further work to devise an operational measurement methodology to estimate connectivity of people to soil.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil security
Soil security Soil Science
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
90 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信