用户对合成、生物和纳米生物农药的看法

S. Sreevidya , Kirtana Sankarasubramanian , Yokraj Katre , Sushma Yadav , Anupama Asthana , Ajaya Kumar Singh , Frank Alexis , Sónia A.C. Carabineiro
{"title":"用户对合成、生物和纳米生物农药的看法","authors":"S. Sreevidya ,&nbsp;Kirtana Sankarasubramanian ,&nbsp;Yokraj Katre ,&nbsp;Sushma Yadav ,&nbsp;Anupama Asthana ,&nbsp;Ajaya Kumar Singh ,&nbsp;Frank Alexis ,&nbsp;Sónia A.C. Carabineiro","doi":"10.1016/j.napere.2023.100058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With a growing global population, the demand for food, clothing and shelter became crucial for sustaining life. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic/endemic, along with the threat of other endemics, posed significant challenges in ensuring the delivery of nutritionally rich food. To address this, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended the ban of some highly toxic chemical pesticides. Excessive consumption and exposure to pesticides possibly contributed to a decline in the human immunity levels making our fight against the pandemics more difficult and challenging. During the lockdown COVID-19 crisis, we conducted a survey to gather insights from farm landers (FLs), garden lovers (GLs), domestic front users (DFUs) predominantly from India, but also from other regions worldwide. The survey aimed at better understanding the usage of pesticides, both chemicals (CPs), bio-pesticides (BPs) or both, and their global utilization. A statistical survey with seven rudimentary sections was designed to receive the inputs (elementary inputs, awareness and perception, pesticide utility, health, ecology, and alternatives for safer trials) with fairness and care. The data was statistically analyzed within each group of population, revealing significant variations within the groups. Our study indicated that FLs (44.7 %) predominantly used BPs, GLs (18.8 %) relied on CPs, while DFUs (100.0 %) used a combination of both without any specific intention. Correlation analysis, given by R (correlation coefficient) and p (probability of obtaining an equal or more extreme effect than the found considering the null hypothesis as true) values revealed the existence of a positive and significant relationship between the selected variables, such as level of education (LOE) and gender, with the adoption of new alternatives (2loglikelihood = 64.743, with χ<sup>2</sup> = 128.4, degrees of freedom (df) = 24, p&lt;*0.05, **0.01, and *** 0.001) through multinomial regression analysis, indicating the fitness of the model. Likewise, our study primarily focused on exploring the insights for the development of nano-biopesticides, as improved alternatives to the existing solutions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Pesticide Research","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100058"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Users opinion about synthetic, bio- and nano-biopesticides\",\"authors\":\"S. Sreevidya ,&nbsp;Kirtana Sankarasubramanian ,&nbsp;Yokraj Katre ,&nbsp;Sushma Yadav ,&nbsp;Anupama Asthana ,&nbsp;Ajaya Kumar Singh ,&nbsp;Frank Alexis ,&nbsp;Sónia A.C. Carabineiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.napere.2023.100058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>With a growing global population, the demand for food, clothing and shelter became crucial for sustaining life. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic/endemic, along with the threat of other endemics, posed significant challenges in ensuring the delivery of nutritionally rich food. To address this, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended the ban of some highly toxic chemical pesticides. Excessive consumption and exposure to pesticides possibly contributed to a decline in the human immunity levels making our fight against the pandemics more difficult and challenging. During the lockdown COVID-19 crisis, we conducted a survey to gather insights from farm landers (FLs), garden lovers (GLs), domestic front users (DFUs) predominantly from India, but also from other regions worldwide. The survey aimed at better understanding the usage of pesticides, both chemicals (CPs), bio-pesticides (BPs) or both, and their global utilization. A statistical survey with seven rudimentary sections was designed to receive the inputs (elementary inputs, awareness and perception, pesticide utility, health, ecology, and alternatives for safer trials) with fairness and care. The data was statistically analyzed within each group of population, revealing significant variations within the groups. Our study indicated that FLs (44.7 %) predominantly used BPs, GLs (18.8 %) relied on CPs, while DFUs (100.0 %) used a combination of both without any specific intention. Correlation analysis, given by R (correlation coefficient) and p (probability of obtaining an equal or more extreme effect than the found considering the null hypothesis as true) values revealed the existence of a positive and significant relationship between the selected variables, such as level of education (LOE) and gender, with the adoption of new alternatives (2loglikelihood = 64.743, with χ<sup>2</sup> = 128.4, degrees of freedom (df) = 24, p&lt;*0.05, **0.01, and *** 0.001) through multinomial regression analysis, indicating the fitness of the model. Likewise, our study primarily focused on exploring the insights for the development of nano-biopesticides, as improved alternatives to the existing solutions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Natural Pesticide Research\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100058\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Natural Pesticide Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773078623000390\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Pesticide Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773078623000390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着全球人口的增长,对食物、衣服和住所的需求对维持生命至关重要。此外,新冠肺炎大流行/地方病,加上其他地方病的威胁,在确保提供营养丰富的食物方面构成了重大挑战。为了解决这一问题,世界卫生组织(世界卫生组织)建议禁止使用某些剧毒化学农药。过量食用和接触杀虫剂可能导致人类免疫力水平下降,使我们抗击流行病的斗争更加困难和具有挑战性。在封锁新冠肺炎危机期间,我们进行了一项调查,以收集主要来自印度但也来自世界其他地区的农场管理者(FL)、园艺爱好者(GLs)、国内前沿用户(DFU)的见解。该调查旨在更好地了解农药的使用情况,包括化学农药、生物农药或两者,以及它们的全球利用情况。一项由七个基本部分组成的统计调查旨在公平和谨慎地接受投入(基本投入、意识和感知、农药效用、健康、生态和更安全试验的替代品)。对每组人群的数据进行统计分析,发现各组之间存在显著差异。我们的研究表明,FL(44.7%)主要使用BP,GL(18.8%)依赖CP,而DFU(100.0%)在没有任何特定意图的情况下使用两者的组合。由R(相关系数)和p(获得与零假设为真时相同或更极端效果的概率)值给出的相关分析表明,所选变量之间存在积极而显著的关系,如教育水平(LOE)和性别,随着新方案的采用(2loglikelihood=64.743,χ2=128.4,自由度(df)=24,p<*0.05、**0.01和***0.001),表明模型的适用性。同样,我们的研究主要集中在探索纳米生物农药的开发见解,作为现有解决方案的改进替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Users opinion about synthetic, bio- and nano-biopesticides

With a growing global population, the demand for food, clothing and shelter became crucial for sustaining life. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic/endemic, along with the threat of other endemics, posed significant challenges in ensuring the delivery of nutritionally rich food. To address this, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended the ban of some highly toxic chemical pesticides. Excessive consumption and exposure to pesticides possibly contributed to a decline in the human immunity levels making our fight against the pandemics more difficult and challenging. During the lockdown COVID-19 crisis, we conducted a survey to gather insights from farm landers (FLs), garden lovers (GLs), domestic front users (DFUs) predominantly from India, but also from other regions worldwide. The survey aimed at better understanding the usage of pesticides, both chemicals (CPs), bio-pesticides (BPs) or both, and their global utilization. A statistical survey with seven rudimentary sections was designed to receive the inputs (elementary inputs, awareness and perception, pesticide utility, health, ecology, and alternatives for safer trials) with fairness and care. The data was statistically analyzed within each group of population, revealing significant variations within the groups. Our study indicated that FLs (44.7 %) predominantly used BPs, GLs (18.8 %) relied on CPs, while DFUs (100.0 %) used a combination of both without any specific intention. Correlation analysis, given by R (correlation coefficient) and p (probability of obtaining an equal or more extreme effect than the found considering the null hypothesis as true) values revealed the existence of a positive and significant relationship between the selected variables, such as level of education (LOE) and gender, with the adoption of new alternatives (2loglikelihood = 64.743, with χ2 = 128.4, degrees of freedom (df) = 24, p<*0.05, **0.01, and *** 0.001) through multinomial regression analysis, indicating the fitness of the model. Likewise, our study primarily focused on exploring the insights for the development of nano-biopesticides, as improved alternatives to the existing solutions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信