检验数据驱动决策支持实体器官移植虚拟交叉匹配的可行性:一项单中心研究

Q4 Medicine
Isha Thapa , Raymond Ye Lee , Marcelo Fernandez Vina , Bing Melody Zhang , Humera Ahmed , Andrew Y Shin , Nicholas Bambos , David N Rosenthal , David Scheinker
{"title":"检验数据驱动决策支持实体器官移植虚拟交叉匹配的可行性:一项单中心研究","authors":"Isha Thapa ,&nbsp;Raymond Ye Lee ,&nbsp;Marcelo Fernandez Vina ,&nbsp;Bing Melody Zhang ,&nbsp;Humera Ahmed ,&nbsp;Andrew Y Shin ,&nbsp;Nicholas Bambos ,&nbsp;David N Rosenthal ,&nbsp;David Scheinker","doi":"10.1016/j.tpr.2023.100144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The virtual crossmatch is used in transplant medicine to assess the compatibility of organ donors and recipients. Virtual crossmatch methods vary considerably across institutions; require highly trained HLA laboratory experts and clinicians for interpretation; and do not generate data in a standardized format suitable for comparison across institutions. It is not known if standardized multi-center data collection and reporting could potentially facilitate the development of data-driven immunologic decision-making. We sought to examine the feasibility of an algorithmic approach to interpreting virtual crossmatch data.</p><p>We examined Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics laboratory data from 1,152 transplant patients and 1,180 donors from an academic medical transplant center over a ten-year time interval. Principal component analysis was used to simplify the complex high-dimensional data with rare outcomes into a format better suited for analysis. Machine learning models were used to predict negative flow crossmatch results. A training subset of the oldest 80% of the data was used to identify the top-performing model. The model's performance was assessed on the newest 20% of the data with the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).</p><p>The final dataset included 2205 crossmatch results from 1446 patient-donor pairs of which 2019 (91.6%) were negative and 186 (8.4%) positive. The top-performing model test set AUC was 0.80.</p><p>This study offers the first proof-of-concept of the feasibility of an algorithmic approach to estimate physical crossmatch results. Standardized, multi-institution data collection is necessary to further explore the possibility of a standardized, data-driven virtual crossmatch process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37786,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Reports","volume":"8 3","pages":"Article 100144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the feasibility of data-driven decision support for the virtual crossmatch for solid organ transplantation: A single center study\",\"authors\":\"Isha Thapa ,&nbsp;Raymond Ye Lee ,&nbsp;Marcelo Fernandez Vina ,&nbsp;Bing Melody Zhang ,&nbsp;Humera Ahmed ,&nbsp;Andrew Y Shin ,&nbsp;Nicholas Bambos ,&nbsp;David N Rosenthal ,&nbsp;David Scheinker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tpr.2023.100144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The virtual crossmatch is used in transplant medicine to assess the compatibility of organ donors and recipients. Virtual crossmatch methods vary considerably across institutions; require highly trained HLA laboratory experts and clinicians for interpretation; and do not generate data in a standardized format suitable for comparison across institutions. It is not known if standardized multi-center data collection and reporting could potentially facilitate the development of data-driven immunologic decision-making. We sought to examine the feasibility of an algorithmic approach to interpreting virtual crossmatch data.</p><p>We examined Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics laboratory data from 1,152 transplant patients and 1,180 donors from an academic medical transplant center over a ten-year time interval. Principal component analysis was used to simplify the complex high-dimensional data with rare outcomes into a format better suited for analysis. Machine learning models were used to predict negative flow crossmatch results. A training subset of the oldest 80% of the data was used to identify the top-performing model. The model's performance was assessed on the newest 20% of the data with the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).</p><p>The final dataset included 2205 crossmatch results from 1446 patient-donor pairs of which 2019 (91.6%) were negative and 186 (8.4%) positive. The top-performing model test set AUC was 0.80.</p><p>This study offers the first proof-of-concept of the feasibility of an algorithmic approach to estimate physical crossmatch results. Standardized, multi-institution data collection is necessary to further explore the possibility of a standardized, data-driven virtual crossmatch process.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation Reports\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451959623000197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451959623000197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虚拟交叉配型用于移植医学,以评估器官供体和受体的兼容性。不同机构的虚拟交叉匹配方法差异很大;需要训练有素的HLA实验室专家和临床医生进行解释;并且不以适合跨机构比较的标准化格式生成数据。目前尚不清楚标准化的多中心数据收集和报告是否有可能促进数据驱动的免疫决策的发展。我们试图检验解释虚拟交叉匹配数据的算法方法的可行性。我们在十年的时间间隔内检查了1152名移植患者和1180名来自学术医学移植中心的捐赠者的组织相容性和免疫遗传学实验室数据。主成分分析用于将具有罕见结果的复杂高维数据简化为更适合分析的格式。机器学习模型用于预测负流量交叉匹配结果。使用最老80%数据的训练子集来识别性能最佳的模型。该模型的性能是根据受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)的最新20%的数据进行评估的。最终数据集包括1446对患者-供体的2205个交叉配型结果,其中2019对(91.6%)为阴性,186对(8.4%)为阳性。表现最好的模型测试集AUC为0.80。该研究首次证明了估计物理交叉配型结果的算法方法的可行性。标准化、多机构的数据收集对于进一步探索标准化、数据驱动的虚拟交叉匹配过程的可能性是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the feasibility of data-driven decision support for the virtual crossmatch for solid organ transplantation: A single center study

The virtual crossmatch is used in transplant medicine to assess the compatibility of organ donors and recipients. Virtual crossmatch methods vary considerably across institutions; require highly trained HLA laboratory experts and clinicians for interpretation; and do not generate data in a standardized format suitable for comparison across institutions. It is not known if standardized multi-center data collection and reporting could potentially facilitate the development of data-driven immunologic decision-making. We sought to examine the feasibility of an algorithmic approach to interpreting virtual crossmatch data.

We examined Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics laboratory data from 1,152 transplant patients and 1,180 donors from an academic medical transplant center over a ten-year time interval. Principal component analysis was used to simplify the complex high-dimensional data with rare outcomes into a format better suited for analysis. Machine learning models were used to predict negative flow crossmatch results. A training subset of the oldest 80% of the data was used to identify the top-performing model. The model's performance was assessed on the newest 20% of the data with the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

The final dataset included 2205 crossmatch results from 1446 patient-donor pairs of which 2019 (91.6%) were negative and 186 (8.4%) positive. The top-performing model test set AUC was 0.80.

This study offers the first proof-of-concept of the feasibility of an algorithmic approach to estimate physical crossmatch results. Standardized, multi-institution data collection is necessary to further explore the possibility of a standardized, data-driven virtual crossmatch process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation Reports
Transplantation Reports Medicine-Transplantation
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
101 days
期刊介绍: To provide to national and regional audiences experiences unique to them or confirming of broader concepts originating in large controlled trials. All aspects of organ, tissue and cell transplantation clinically and experimentally. Transplantation Reports will provide in-depth representation of emerging preclinical, impactful and clinical experiences. -Original basic or clinical science articles that represent initial limited experiences as preliminary reports. -Clinical trials of therapies previously well documented in large trials but now tested in limited, special, ethnic or clinically unique patient populations. -Case studies that confirm prior reports but have occurred in patients displaying unique clinical characteristics such as ethnicities or rarely associated co-morbidities. Transplantation Reports offers these benefits: -Fast and fair peer review -Rapid, article-based publication -Unrivalled visibility and exposure for your research -Immediate, free and permanent access to your paper on Science Direct -Immediately citable using the article DOI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信