采用微萃取技术的高通量分析方法:迈向持续数秒的快速分析

IF 5.2 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Eduardo Carasek, Rafael Scur, Gabrieli Bernardi
{"title":"采用微萃取技术的高通量分析方法:迈向持续数秒的快速分析","authors":"Eduardo Carasek,&nbsp;Rafael Scur,&nbsp;Gabrieli Bernardi","doi":"10.1016/j.sampre.2023.100095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) principles have influenced the development of analytical methods with minimal sample handling and operations, in contrast to conventional techniques, which are often laborious and time-consuming. Since the introduction of microextraction techniques in the 1990s, various approaches, configurations, and sorptive phases have been proposed to replace Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) and Liquid-Liquid Extraction (LLE), covering a wide range of matrices and analytes, focused on chromatography and mass spectrometry instrumentation. The main features of microextraction techniques are simplicity, low solvent consumption, and minimum residue generation. The demand for fast results and the large number of samples, along with advances in analytical instrumentation, have led to the coupling of microextraction techniques with automation and/or the development of technologies for multiple extractions at the same time, known as parallel extractions. As a result of its popularity in medical and pharmaceutical sciences, the 96-well plate has been successfully adapted for Solid Phase Microextraction (SPME) and Liquid Phase Microextraction (LPME), significantly reducing the time required to process a large number of samples. This review presents some of the basic principles of microextraction techniques, and it contextualizes and compares analytical methods published in the period of 2018 to early 2023 in the microextraction context for high-throughput analyses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100052,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Sample Preparation","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100095"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-throughput analytical methods employing microextraction techniques: Towards fast analyses lasting a few seconds\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo Carasek,&nbsp;Rafael Scur,&nbsp;Gabrieli Bernardi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sampre.2023.100095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) principles have influenced the development of analytical methods with minimal sample handling and operations, in contrast to conventional techniques, which are often laborious and time-consuming. Since the introduction of microextraction techniques in the 1990s, various approaches, configurations, and sorptive phases have been proposed to replace Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) and Liquid-Liquid Extraction (LLE), covering a wide range of matrices and analytes, focused on chromatography and mass spectrometry instrumentation. The main features of microextraction techniques are simplicity, low solvent consumption, and minimum residue generation. The demand for fast results and the large number of samples, along with advances in analytical instrumentation, have led to the coupling of microextraction techniques with automation and/or the development of technologies for multiple extractions at the same time, known as parallel extractions. As a result of its popularity in medical and pharmaceutical sciences, the 96-well plate has been successfully adapted for Solid Phase Microextraction (SPME) and Liquid Phase Microextraction (LPME), significantly reducing the time required to process a large number of samples. This review presents some of the basic principles of microextraction techniques, and it contextualizes and compares analytical methods published in the period of 2018 to early 2023 in the microextraction context for high-throughput analyses.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Sample Preparation\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100095\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Sample Preparation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772582023000451\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Sample Preparation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772582023000451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与通常费时费力的传统技术相比,绿色分析化学(GAC)原理影响了分析方法的发展,只需最少的样品处理和操作。自20世纪90年代引入微萃取技术以来,人们提出了各种方法、配置和吸附相来取代固相萃取(SPE)和液-液萃取(LLE),涵盖了广泛的基质和分析物,重点是色谱和质谱仪器。微萃取技术的主要特点是简单、溶剂消耗低、残留物产生少。对快速结果和大量样本的需求,以及分析仪器的进步,导致了微萃取技术与自动化的结合和/或同时进行多种提取的技术的发展,即所谓的平行提取。由于其在医学和制药科学中的普及,96孔板已成功适用于固相微萃取(SPME)和液相微萃取(LPME),大大减少了处理大量样品所需的时间。这篇综述介绍了微萃取技术的一些基本原理,并对2018年至2023年初发表的用于高通量分析的微萃取分析方法进行了背景分析和比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

High-throughput analytical methods employing microextraction techniques: Towards fast analyses lasting a few seconds

High-throughput analytical methods employing microextraction techniques: Towards fast analyses lasting a few seconds

Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) principles have influenced the development of analytical methods with minimal sample handling and operations, in contrast to conventional techniques, which are often laborious and time-consuming. Since the introduction of microextraction techniques in the 1990s, various approaches, configurations, and sorptive phases have been proposed to replace Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) and Liquid-Liquid Extraction (LLE), covering a wide range of matrices and analytes, focused on chromatography and mass spectrometry instrumentation. The main features of microextraction techniques are simplicity, low solvent consumption, and minimum residue generation. The demand for fast results and the large number of samples, along with advances in analytical instrumentation, have led to the coupling of microextraction techniques with automation and/or the development of technologies for multiple extractions at the same time, known as parallel extractions. As a result of its popularity in medical and pharmaceutical sciences, the 96-well plate has been successfully adapted for Solid Phase Microextraction (SPME) and Liquid Phase Microextraction (LPME), significantly reducing the time required to process a large number of samples. This review presents some of the basic principles of microextraction techniques, and it contextualizes and compares analytical methods published in the period of 2018 to early 2023 in the microextraction context for high-throughput analyses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信