Arthur M. Tran , Mark D. Griffiths , Drew B. Winters
{"title":"小银行经理是谨慎的:用本福德定律分析贷款损失补偿","authors":"Arthur M. Tran , Mark D. Griffiths , Drew B. Winters","doi":"10.1016/j.jeconbus.2023.106128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using an analysis of the two leading digits based on Benford’s Law, we analyze rounding patterns in loan loss allowances (LLAs) for a bank sample based on good and bad times, net income, profitability, bank size, regulatory level, and whether the banks are private or public. We find clear evidence of upward rounding during good times. Banks that are smaller, private, and subject to more lenient regulatory and supervisory levels also tend to round LLAs upward more than their larger, public, and more heavily regulated counterparts. The results are consistent with previous studies supporting non-opportunistic incentives (including signaling, reducing pro-cyclicality, and pursuing prudence and efficiency) under which bank managers increase the LLA. In addition to shedding more light on the ongoing debate about the management of provisioning for loan losses, we present an argument for why the rounding mechanism in LLAs is a rational consequence of U.S. commercial banks being subjected to opposing regulatory forces coming from bank regulators and securities regulators.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47522,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 106128"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Small bank managers are prudent: A Benford’s Law approach to analyzing loan loss allowances\",\"authors\":\"Arthur M. Tran , Mark D. Griffiths , Drew B. Winters\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jeconbus.2023.106128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Using an analysis of the two leading digits based on Benford’s Law, we analyze rounding patterns in loan loss allowances (LLAs) for a bank sample based on good and bad times, net income, profitability, bank size, regulatory level, and whether the banks are private or public. We find clear evidence of upward rounding during good times. Banks that are smaller, private, and subject to more lenient regulatory and supervisory levels also tend to round LLAs upward more than their larger, public, and more heavily regulated counterparts. The results are consistent with previous studies supporting non-opportunistic incentives (including signaling, reducing pro-cyclicality, and pursuing prudence and efficiency) under which bank managers increase the LLA. In addition to shedding more light on the ongoing debate about the management of provisioning for loan losses, we present an argument for why the rounding mechanism in LLAs is a rational consequence of U.S. commercial banks being subjected to opposing regulatory forces coming from bank regulators and securities regulators.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS\",\"volume\":\"125 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148619523000218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148619523000218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Small bank managers are prudent: A Benford’s Law approach to analyzing loan loss allowances
Using an analysis of the two leading digits based on Benford’s Law, we analyze rounding patterns in loan loss allowances (LLAs) for a bank sample based on good and bad times, net income, profitability, bank size, regulatory level, and whether the banks are private or public. We find clear evidence of upward rounding during good times. Banks that are smaller, private, and subject to more lenient regulatory and supervisory levels also tend to round LLAs upward more than their larger, public, and more heavily regulated counterparts. The results are consistent with previous studies supporting non-opportunistic incentives (including signaling, reducing pro-cyclicality, and pursuing prudence and efficiency) under which bank managers increase the LLA. In addition to shedding more light on the ongoing debate about the management of provisioning for loan losses, we present an argument for why the rounding mechanism in LLAs is a rational consequence of U.S. commercial banks being subjected to opposing regulatory forces coming from bank regulators and securities regulators.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Economics and Business: Studies in Corporate and Financial Behavior. The Journal publishes high quality research papers in all fields of finance and in closely related fields of economics. The Journal is interested in both theoretical and applied research with an emphasis on topics in corporate finance, financial markets and institutions, and investments. Research in real estate, insurance, monetary theory and policy, and industrial organization is also welcomed. Papers that deal with the relation between the financial structure of firms and the industrial structure of the product market are especially encouraged.