催眠治疗获得性脑损伤:四个病例和五个可测试的预测

IF 2.3 3区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2023.101046

Jonas Kristoffer Lindeløv , Timo L. Kvamme , Kristine Rømer Thomsen , Rikke Overgaard , Morten Overgaard

引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的研究发现，催眠暗示对后天性脑损伤后的认知障碍有很大的治疗作用。然而，人们对这些影响的潜在机制知之甚少。提出了一个总体框架，其中（1）认知性脑损伤后遗症的很大一部分可归因于消极的自我期望，（2）催眠是操纵消极自我期望的有力方法。四个案例为这一框架提供了例证和补充。首先，大脑恢复的心理图像可能是有效的，即使它与“真实”的身体脑损伤不符。其次，一些患者尽管有很大的客观改善，但主观上并没有改善。第三，一些患者在受到激励的情况下抑制了积极的治疗效果，例如，当他们在正在进行的诉讼中被评估为金钱补偿时。第四，受伤前的自传体记忆可能是取得积极治疗效果的重要前提。我们得出了五个可测试的预测，这些预测可以进一步优化获得性脑损伤的催眠。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Hypnosis for acquired brain injury: Four patient cases and five testable predictions

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

New Ideas in Psychology Multiple-

CiteScore

4.80

自引率

3.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： New Ideas in Psychology is a journal for theoretical psychology in its broadest sense. We are looking for new and seminal ideas, from within Psychology and from other fields that have something to bring to Psychology. We welcome presentations and criticisms of theory, of background metaphysics, and of fundamental issues of method, both empirical and conceptual. We put special emphasis on the need for informed discussion of psychological theories to be interdisciplinary. Empirical papers are accepted at New Ideas in Psychology, but only as long as they focus on conceptual issues and are theoretically creative. We are also open to comments or debate, interviews, and book reviews.