生物杀菌剂哈兹木霉防治马铃薯晚疫病、早疫病的效果研究

Md. Mahi Imam Mollah , Nayem Hassan
{"title":"生物杀菌剂哈兹木霉防治马铃薯晚疫病、早疫病的效果研究","authors":"Md. Mahi Imam Mollah ,&nbsp;Nayem Hassan","doi":"10.1016/j.napere.2023.100047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study was conducted at Rangpur area of Bangladesh to evaluate the performance of <em>Trichoderma harzianum</em> based bio-fungicide against late blight and early blight of potato. A commercial fungicide, Agrizeb (Mancozeb) 80 WP was applied for comparison. These fungicides were applied in potato filed already infected by late and early blight. Lycomax found most effective for controlling both late blight and early blight while Agrizeb found potent for early blight. After applying Lycomax, late blight infection in plant has not increased rather decreased to 20.0% from the existing 22.67% and leaf infestation reduced to 10.67% from the existing 13.33%. In contrast for Agrizeb, plant infection increased to 71.67% from the prevailing 22.0% and leaf infection increased to 73% from the existing 14.67%. Thus, Lycomax confirmed 79.09% reduction of plant infection and 89.04% reduction of leaf infection compared to control which was 25.09% and 25%, respectively for Agrizeb. For early blight, same dose of Lycomax also reduce plant infection to 1.67% from existing 14.67% and leaf infection to 8.0% from prevailing 13.33%. Plant infection decreased to 5.0% from existing 15.0% and leaf infection 13.33% from 14.67% for Agrizeb. Therefore, Lycomax provided 98.19% control of plant infection and 90.16% control of leaf infection while Agrizeb provided 94.58% plant infection and 83.61% leaf infection over control. Moreover, Lycomax confirmed 21.66 ton/ha and 22.0 ton/ha of potato yield recovering the late blight and early blight diseases, respectively. These results conclude that Lycomax can effectively be applied to control late blight and early blight diseases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Pesticide Research","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100047"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Trichoderma harzianum, as a biological fungicide against fungal diseases of potato, late blight and early blight\",\"authors\":\"Md. Mahi Imam Mollah ,&nbsp;Nayem Hassan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.napere.2023.100047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study was conducted at Rangpur area of Bangladesh to evaluate the performance of <em>Trichoderma harzianum</em> based bio-fungicide against late blight and early blight of potato. A commercial fungicide, Agrizeb (Mancozeb) 80 WP was applied for comparison. These fungicides were applied in potato filed already infected by late and early blight. Lycomax found most effective for controlling both late blight and early blight while Agrizeb found potent for early blight. After applying Lycomax, late blight infection in plant has not increased rather decreased to 20.0% from the existing 22.67% and leaf infestation reduced to 10.67% from the existing 13.33%. In contrast for Agrizeb, plant infection increased to 71.67% from the prevailing 22.0% and leaf infection increased to 73% from the existing 14.67%. Thus, Lycomax confirmed 79.09% reduction of plant infection and 89.04% reduction of leaf infection compared to control which was 25.09% and 25%, respectively for Agrizeb. For early blight, same dose of Lycomax also reduce plant infection to 1.67% from existing 14.67% and leaf infection to 8.0% from prevailing 13.33%. Plant infection decreased to 5.0% from existing 15.0% and leaf infection 13.33% from 14.67% for Agrizeb. Therefore, Lycomax provided 98.19% control of plant infection and 90.16% control of leaf infection while Agrizeb provided 94.58% plant infection and 83.61% leaf infection over control. Moreover, Lycomax confirmed 21.66 ton/ha and 22.0 ton/ha of potato yield recovering the late blight and early blight diseases, respectively. These results conclude that Lycomax can effectively be applied to control late blight and early blight diseases.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Natural Pesticide Research\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100047\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Natural Pesticide Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773078623000286\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Pesticide Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773078623000286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究在孟加拉国朗布尔地区进行,以评估基于哈茨木霉的生物杀菌剂对马铃薯晚疫病和早疫病的防治性能。应用市售杀菌剂Agrizeb(Mancozeb)80 WP进行比较。这些杀菌剂应用于已经感染晚疫病和早疫病的马铃薯地。Lycomax被发现对控制晚疫病和早疫病最有效,而Agrizeb被发现对早疫病有效。施用Lycomax后,植物的晚疫病感染率没有增加,而是从现有的22.67%下降到20.0%,叶患率从现有的13.33%下降到10.67%。与此相反,Agrizeb的植物感染率从普遍的22.0%上升到71.67%,叶患从现有的14.67%上升到73%。因此,与阿格里泽布的25.09%和25%的对照相比,Lycomax证实植物感染减少了79.09%,叶片感染减少了89.04%。对于早疫病,相同剂量的Lycomax还将植物感染率从现有的14.67%降低到1.67%,将叶片感染率从流行的13.33%降低到8.0%。Agrizeb的植物感染率由现有的15.0%降低到5.0%,将叶片传染率从14.67%降低至13.33%。因此,Lycomax对植物感染的控制率为98.19%,对叶片感染的控制度为90.16%,而Agrizeb对植物感染和叶片感染的抑制率分别为94.58%和83.61%。此外,Lycomax证实,从晚疫病和早疫病中恢复的马铃薯产量分别为21.66吨/公顷和22.0吨/公顷。这些结果表明,番茄红可以有效地防治晚疫病和早疫病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of Trichoderma harzianum, as a biological fungicide against fungal diseases of potato, late blight and early blight

This study was conducted at Rangpur area of Bangladesh to evaluate the performance of Trichoderma harzianum based bio-fungicide against late blight and early blight of potato. A commercial fungicide, Agrizeb (Mancozeb) 80 WP was applied for comparison. These fungicides were applied in potato filed already infected by late and early blight. Lycomax found most effective for controlling both late blight and early blight while Agrizeb found potent for early blight. After applying Lycomax, late blight infection in plant has not increased rather decreased to 20.0% from the existing 22.67% and leaf infestation reduced to 10.67% from the existing 13.33%. In contrast for Agrizeb, plant infection increased to 71.67% from the prevailing 22.0% and leaf infection increased to 73% from the existing 14.67%. Thus, Lycomax confirmed 79.09% reduction of plant infection and 89.04% reduction of leaf infection compared to control which was 25.09% and 25%, respectively for Agrizeb. For early blight, same dose of Lycomax also reduce plant infection to 1.67% from existing 14.67% and leaf infection to 8.0% from prevailing 13.33%. Plant infection decreased to 5.0% from existing 15.0% and leaf infection 13.33% from 14.67% for Agrizeb. Therefore, Lycomax provided 98.19% control of plant infection and 90.16% control of leaf infection while Agrizeb provided 94.58% plant infection and 83.61% leaf infection over control. Moreover, Lycomax confirmed 21.66 ton/ha and 22.0 ton/ha of potato yield recovering the late blight and early blight diseases, respectively. These results conclude that Lycomax can effectively be applied to control late blight and early blight diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信