通过确定性训练推进第一人称体验

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Jonas Göken, Ulrich Weger
{"title":"通过确定性训练推进第一人称体验","authors":"Jonas Göken,&nbsp;Ulrich Weger","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2023.101059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>First-person access to experience is of eminent importance for psychological research and for various applied domains such as the prevention and treatment of mental and physical illness. It is therefore of major interest to find ways to enhance the accuracy of introspective access to experience. Interventions based, for example, on meditation or adaptive feedback training were able to advance the accuracy of metacognitive access (i.e., a subcomponent of introspective access). However, there is an open debate about possible confounds and especially the transfer of the training effect to other domains. With the current series of studies, we aimed to test an intervention to advance introspective access that (1) was based on a conceptualization of the sense of certainty, (2) comprised a first-person approach addressing cognitive as well as affective and somatic dimensions of experience, and (3) prioritized low training duration and attainment of high experiential depth. We investigated a domain-specific (study A, <em>n</em> = 65) and a domain-general (study B, <em>n</em> = 70) effect of sense of certainty training on metacognitive accuracy and finally tried to replicate the domain-specific effect (study C, <em>n</em> = 41). Altogether, the studies showed mixed results regarding a domain-specific and negative results regarding a domain-general effect of the intervention. Based on our findings, we discuss implications of a first-person approach to training systematic self-enquiry. We offer both a conservative and a liberal interpretation of our results and suggest that this important issue is not put aside prematurely and that the training of access to experience through first-person enquiry is given a fair chance in future research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing first-person access to experience through sense of certainty training\",\"authors\":\"Jonas Göken,&nbsp;Ulrich Weger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2023.101059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>First-person access to experience is of eminent importance for psychological research and for various applied domains such as the prevention and treatment of mental and physical illness. It is therefore of major interest to find ways to enhance the accuracy of introspective access to experience. Interventions based, for example, on meditation or adaptive feedback training were able to advance the accuracy of metacognitive access (i.e., a subcomponent of introspective access). However, there is an open debate about possible confounds and especially the transfer of the training effect to other domains. With the current series of studies, we aimed to test an intervention to advance introspective access that (1) was based on a conceptualization of the sense of certainty, (2) comprised a first-person approach addressing cognitive as well as affective and somatic dimensions of experience, and (3) prioritized low training duration and attainment of high experiential depth. We investigated a domain-specific (study A, <em>n</em> = 65) and a domain-general (study B, <em>n</em> = 70) effect of sense of certainty training on metacognitive accuracy and finally tried to replicate the domain-specific effect (study C, <em>n</em> = 41). Altogether, the studies showed mixed results regarding a domain-specific and negative results regarding a domain-general effect of the intervention. Based on our findings, we discuss implications of a first-person approach to training systematic self-enquiry. We offer both a conservative and a liberal interpretation of our results and suggest that this important issue is not put aside prematurely and that the training of access to experience through first-person enquiry is given a fair chance in future research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X23000521\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X23000521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第一人称获得经验对于心理学研究和各种应用领域(如精神和身体疾病的预防和治疗)具有极其重要的意义。因此,找到提高内省获取经验的准确性的方法是非常重要的。例如,基于冥想或自适应反馈训练的干预措施能够提高元认知访问的准确性(即,内省访问的一个子组成部分)。然而,关于可能的混淆,尤其是训练效果向其他领域的转移,存在着公开的争论。在目前的一系列研究中,我们旨在测试一种促进内省进入的干预措施,该干预措施(1)基于确定感的概念化,(2)包括解决经验的认知、情感和身体维度的第一人称方法,以及(3)优先考虑低训练持续时间和高体验深度。我们研究了确定感训练对元认知准确性的特定领域(研究a,n=65)和一般领域(研究B,n=70)影响,并最终试图复制特定领域的影响(研究C,n=41)。总之,这些研究显示了关于干预的特定领域效果的混合结果和关于干预的一般领域效果的负面结果。基于我们的研究结果,我们讨论了第一人称方法对训练系统自我询问的影响。我们对我们的研究结果提供了保守和自由的解释,并建议不要过早地搁置这一重要问题,在未来的研究中,通过第一人称询问获得经验的培训是一个公平的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advancing first-person access to experience through sense of certainty training

First-person access to experience is of eminent importance for psychological research and for various applied domains such as the prevention and treatment of mental and physical illness. It is therefore of major interest to find ways to enhance the accuracy of introspective access to experience. Interventions based, for example, on meditation or adaptive feedback training were able to advance the accuracy of metacognitive access (i.e., a subcomponent of introspective access). However, there is an open debate about possible confounds and especially the transfer of the training effect to other domains. With the current series of studies, we aimed to test an intervention to advance introspective access that (1) was based on a conceptualization of the sense of certainty, (2) comprised a first-person approach addressing cognitive as well as affective and somatic dimensions of experience, and (3) prioritized low training duration and attainment of high experiential depth. We investigated a domain-specific (study A, n = 65) and a domain-general (study B, n = 70) effect of sense of certainty training on metacognitive accuracy and finally tried to replicate the domain-specific effect (study C, n = 41). Altogether, the studies showed mixed results regarding a domain-specific and negative results regarding a domain-general effect of the intervention. Based on our findings, we discuss implications of a first-person approach to training systematic self-enquiry. We offer both a conservative and a liberal interpretation of our results and suggest that this important issue is not put aside prematurely and that the training of access to experience through first-person enquiry is given a fair chance in future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信