工业物联网系统的用户体验关键绩效指标:多语种文献综述

Adam Trendowicz, Eduard C. Groen, Jens Henningsen, Julien Siebert, Nedo Bartels, Sven Storck, Thomas Kuhn
{"title":"工业物联网系统的用户体验关键绩效指标:多语种文献综述","authors":"Adam Trendowicz,&nbsp;Eduard C. Groen,&nbsp;Jens Henningsen,&nbsp;Julien Siebert,&nbsp;Nedo Bartels,&nbsp;Sven Storck,&nbsp;Thomas Kuhn","doi":"10.1016/j.digbus.2023.100057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In software systems, user experience (UX) is a quality that provides value to its intended users. Therefore, we consider it critical to manage UX and its link to business value quantitatively. Key performance indicators (KPIs) have been widely adopted for objectively measuring factors that influence business success, including measuring UX characteristics and their business contribution in the context of software systems in general. Yet, measuring UX in the context of complex Internet of Things (IoT) systems, especially Industrial IoT (IIoT) systems, remains a challenge.</p><p>This paper presents a multivocal literature review (MLR) of the UX-KPIs proposed in the context of (I)IoT systems, along with factors influencing UX and challenges of quantifying UX. We investigate the status quo and derive recommendations for measuring the UX of (I)IoT systems.</p><p>Our analysis of 64 publications shows that UX has so far received relatively little attention in the context of (I)IoT. Although we identified 605 KPIs, 78 influencing factors, and 119 challenges, most of the UX features discussed were defined in a broader context of software systems, i.e., they were less specific to IoT, but rather focused on universal system quality characteristics such as functional suitability, performance efficiency, usability, and reliability.</p><p>Finally, no generally accepted approach for measuring UX in (I)IoT systems and how these contribute to the overall business value has been proposed yet. We also found little evidence that improving UX or achieving a good UX currently plays an explicit role in the design and development of IoT systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100376,"journal":{"name":"Digital Business","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100057"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"User experience key performance indicators for industrial IoT systems: A multivocal literature review\",\"authors\":\"Adam Trendowicz,&nbsp;Eduard C. Groen,&nbsp;Jens Henningsen,&nbsp;Julien Siebert,&nbsp;Nedo Bartels,&nbsp;Sven Storck,&nbsp;Thomas Kuhn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.digbus.2023.100057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In software systems, user experience (UX) is a quality that provides value to its intended users. Therefore, we consider it critical to manage UX and its link to business value quantitatively. Key performance indicators (KPIs) have been widely adopted for objectively measuring factors that influence business success, including measuring UX characteristics and their business contribution in the context of software systems in general. Yet, measuring UX in the context of complex Internet of Things (IoT) systems, especially Industrial IoT (IIoT) systems, remains a challenge.</p><p>This paper presents a multivocal literature review (MLR) of the UX-KPIs proposed in the context of (I)IoT systems, along with factors influencing UX and challenges of quantifying UX. We investigate the status quo and derive recommendations for measuring the UX of (I)IoT systems.</p><p>Our analysis of 64 publications shows that UX has so far received relatively little attention in the context of (I)IoT. Although we identified 605 KPIs, 78 influencing factors, and 119 challenges, most of the UX features discussed were defined in a broader context of software systems, i.e., they were less specific to IoT, but rather focused on universal system quality characteristics such as functional suitability, performance efficiency, usability, and reliability.</p><p>Finally, no generally accepted approach for measuring UX in (I)IoT systems and how these contribute to the overall business value has been proposed yet. We also found little evidence that improving UX or achieving a good UX currently plays an explicit role in the design and development of IoT systems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Business\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100057\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666954423000054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666954423000054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

在软件系统中,用户体验(UX)是一种为其预期用户提供价值的质量。因此,我们认为定量管理用户体验及其与业务价值的联系至关重要。关键性能指标(KPI)已被广泛用于客观衡量影响业务成功的因素,包括衡量用户体验特征及其在软件系统中的业务贡献。然而,在复杂的物联网(IoT)系统,特别是工业物联网(IIoT)系统的背景下测量用户体验仍然是一个挑战。本文对在(I)物联网系统背景下提出的用户体验KPI进行了多语言文献综述(MLR),以及影响用户体验的因素和量化用户体验的挑战。我们调查了现状,并得出了衡量(I)物联网系统用户体验的建议。我们对64篇出版物的分析表明,到目前为止,用户体验在(I)物联网方面受到的关注相对较少。尽管我们确定了605个KPI、78个影响因素和119个挑战,但所讨论的大多数用户体验特征都是在更广泛的软件系统背景下定义的,即它们不太特定于物联网,而是专注于通用的系统质量特征,如功能适用性、性能效率、可用性和可靠性。最后,还没有提出一种普遍接受的方法来衡量(I)物联网系统中的用户体验,以及这些系统如何对整体业务价值做出贡献。我们还发现,几乎没有证据表明,改善用户体验或实现良好的用户体验目前在物联网系统的设计和开发中发挥着明确的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
User experience key performance indicators for industrial IoT systems: A multivocal literature review

In software systems, user experience (UX) is a quality that provides value to its intended users. Therefore, we consider it critical to manage UX and its link to business value quantitatively. Key performance indicators (KPIs) have been widely adopted for objectively measuring factors that influence business success, including measuring UX characteristics and their business contribution in the context of software systems in general. Yet, measuring UX in the context of complex Internet of Things (IoT) systems, especially Industrial IoT (IIoT) systems, remains a challenge.

This paper presents a multivocal literature review (MLR) of the UX-KPIs proposed in the context of (I)IoT systems, along with factors influencing UX and challenges of quantifying UX. We investigate the status quo and derive recommendations for measuring the UX of (I)IoT systems.

Our analysis of 64 publications shows that UX has so far received relatively little attention in the context of (I)IoT. Although we identified 605 KPIs, 78 influencing factors, and 119 challenges, most of the UX features discussed were defined in a broader context of software systems, i.e., they were less specific to IoT, but rather focused on universal system quality characteristics such as functional suitability, performance efficiency, usability, and reliability.

Finally, no generally accepted approach for measuring UX in (I)IoT systems and how these contribute to the overall business value has been proposed yet. We also found little evidence that improving UX or achieving a good UX currently plays an explicit role in the design and development of IoT systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信