什么是支点:摸黑摸大象

Ayoob Sadeghiani , Alistair Anderson
{"title":"什么是支点:摸黑摸大象","authors":"Ayoob Sadeghiani ,&nbsp;Alistair Anderson","doi":"10.1016/j.digbus.2023.100056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The term ‘pivot’ first appeared in the practical literature, demonstrating its role in the Lean Startup, and immediately emerged in the academic literature. However, it suffered from conflicting perceptions and practice-academy divide. Moreover, recently, a growing number of scholars introduced it as a response to the pandemic crisis, at times as an umbrella term. In this study, we first test the concept ‘pivot’ against clarity criteria and find its problematic issues based on a qualitative content analysis of the literature; then, using a multi-case study, we get a critical distance from the pivot's origin; parsimoniously reposition it as ‘substitution’, differentiate it from ‘pivoting’ as its process theory; and discuss it in relation to vision, strategy, and business model. Finally, we propose a conceptual basis and some rules for operationalization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100376,"journal":{"name":"Digital Business","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100056"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What pivot is: Touching an elephant in the dark\",\"authors\":\"Ayoob Sadeghiani ,&nbsp;Alistair Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.digbus.2023.100056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The term ‘pivot’ first appeared in the practical literature, demonstrating its role in the Lean Startup, and immediately emerged in the academic literature. However, it suffered from conflicting perceptions and practice-academy divide. Moreover, recently, a growing number of scholars introduced it as a response to the pandemic crisis, at times as an umbrella term. In this study, we first test the concept ‘pivot’ against clarity criteria and find its problematic issues based on a qualitative content analysis of the literature; then, using a multi-case study, we get a critical distance from the pivot's origin; parsimoniously reposition it as ‘substitution’, differentiate it from ‘pivoting’ as its process theory; and discuss it in relation to vision, strategy, and business model. Finally, we propose a conceptual basis and some rules for operationalization.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Business\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100056\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666954423000042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666954423000042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“支点”一词最早出现在实践文献中,展示了它在精益创业中的作用,并立即出现在学术文献中。然而,它受到了观念冲突和实践学院分歧的影响。此外,最近,越来越多的学者将其作为对疫情危机的回应,有时是一个总括性术语。在这项研究中,我们首先根据清晰度标准测试了“支点”的概念,并在对文献进行定性内容分析的基础上发现了其存在的问题;然后,通过多个案例的研究,我们得到了与枢轴原点的临界距离;吝啬地将其重新定位为“替代”,将其区别于作为其过程理论的“转向”;并从愿景、战略和商业模式等方面对其进行了讨论。最后,我们提出了一个概念基础和一些操作规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What pivot is: Touching an elephant in the dark

The term ‘pivot’ first appeared in the practical literature, demonstrating its role in the Lean Startup, and immediately emerged in the academic literature. However, it suffered from conflicting perceptions and practice-academy divide. Moreover, recently, a growing number of scholars introduced it as a response to the pandemic crisis, at times as an umbrella term. In this study, we first test the concept ‘pivot’ against clarity criteria and find its problematic issues based on a qualitative content analysis of the literature; then, using a multi-case study, we get a critical distance from the pivot's origin; parsimoniously reposition it as ‘substitution’, differentiate it from ‘pivoting’ as its process theory; and discuss it in relation to vision, strategy, and business model. Finally, we propose a conceptual basis and some rules for operationalization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信