机器人技术和腹腔镜技术在微创肝切除术中的应用研究

Jinglin Wang , Yuyan Chen , Senzhe Xia, Xueqian Qin, Shujun Liu, Haozhen Ren
{"title":"机器人技术和腹腔镜技术在微创肝切除术中的应用研究","authors":"Jinglin Wang ,&nbsp;Yuyan Chen ,&nbsp;Senzhe Xia,&nbsp;Xueqian Qin,&nbsp;Shujun Liu,&nbsp;Haozhen Ren","doi":"10.1016/j.bmt.2022.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The concept of minimally invasive liver surgery has been widely accepted due to the advantages of fast recovery. Robotic hepatectomy is different from laparoscopic hepatectomy due to its fixed joint instruments, operation mode and magnification. This manuscript aims to compare the safety and efficacy of robotic and laparoscopic hepatectomy in the treatment of liver diseases. In this manuscript, we retrospectively studied 246 patients (143 with robotic hepatectomy and 103 with laparoscopic hepatectomy). The clinical basic information, operation time, intraoperative bleeding, conversion to laparotomy, postoperative hospital stay, anal exhaust time, postoperative eating time, ambulation time, and postoperative hematological indicators were analyzed. Robotic hepatectomy has certain advantages in shortening the length of hospital stay (4.9 ​± ​1.3 VS 6.8 ​± ​2.2 days, P ​&lt; ​0.001) and reducing intraoperative bleeding (174.8 ​± ​142.7 VS 341.2 ​± ​187.3 ​ml, P ​&lt; ​0.001) compared with laparoscopic hepatectomy. It is demonstrated that robotic hepatectomy is an outstanding surgical strategy for clinical application.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100180,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Technology","volume":"3 ","pages":"Pages 11-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigations of robotics and laparoscopy in minimally invasive hepatectomy\",\"authors\":\"Jinglin Wang ,&nbsp;Yuyan Chen ,&nbsp;Senzhe Xia,&nbsp;Xueqian Qin,&nbsp;Shujun Liu,&nbsp;Haozhen Ren\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bmt.2022.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The concept of minimally invasive liver surgery has been widely accepted due to the advantages of fast recovery. Robotic hepatectomy is different from laparoscopic hepatectomy due to its fixed joint instruments, operation mode and magnification. This manuscript aims to compare the safety and efficacy of robotic and laparoscopic hepatectomy in the treatment of liver diseases. In this manuscript, we retrospectively studied 246 patients (143 with robotic hepatectomy and 103 with laparoscopic hepatectomy). The clinical basic information, operation time, intraoperative bleeding, conversion to laparotomy, postoperative hospital stay, anal exhaust time, postoperative eating time, ambulation time, and postoperative hematological indicators were analyzed. Robotic hepatectomy has certain advantages in shortening the length of hospital stay (4.9 ​± ​1.3 VS 6.8 ​± ​2.2 days, P ​&lt; ​0.001) and reducing intraoperative bleeding (174.8 ​± ​142.7 VS 341.2 ​± ​187.3 ​ml, P ​&lt; ​0.001) compared with laparoscopic hepatectomy. It is demonstrated that robotic hepatectomy is an outstanding surgical strategy for clinical application.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Technology\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 11-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949723X22000174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949723X22000174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

微创肝脏手术的概念由于其快速恢复的优点而被广泛接受。机器人肝切除术与腹腔镜肝切除术的不同之处在于其固定的关节器械、手术方式和放大倍数。本文旨在比较机器人和腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝病的安全性和有效性。在这份手稿中,我们回顾性研究了246名患者(143名机器人肝切除术,103名腹腔镜肝切除术)。分析临床基本情况、手术时间、术中出血、转开腹、术后住院时间、肛门排气时间、术后进食时间、行走时间、术前血液学指标。机器人肝切除术在缩短住院时间方面具有一定优势(4.9​±​1.3与6.8​±​2.2天,P​<;​0.001)和减少术中出血(174.8​±​142.7对341.2​±​187.3​ml,P​<;​0.001)。研究表明,机器人肝切除术是一种出色的临床应用手术策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigations of robotics and laparoscopy in minimally invasive hepatectomy

The concept of minimally invasive liver surgery has been widely accepted due to the advantages of fast recovery. Robotic hepatectomy is different from laparoscopic hepatectomy due to its fixed joint instruments, operation mode and magnification. This manuscript aims to compare the safety and efficacy of robotic and laparoscopic hepatectomy in the treatment of liver diseases. In this manuscript, we retrospectively studied 246 patients (143 with robotic hepatectomy and 103 with laparoscopic hepatectomy). The clinical basic information, operation time, intraoperative bleeding, conversion to laparotomy, postoperative hospital stay, anal exhaust time, postoperative eating time, ambulation time, and postoperative hematological indicators were analyzed. Robotic hepatectomy has certain advantages in shortening the length of hospital stay (4.9 ​± ​1.3 VS 6.8 ​± ​2.2 days, P ​< ​0.001) and reducing intraoperative bleeding (174.8 ​± ​142.7 VS 341.2 ​± ​187.3 ​ml, P ​< ​0.001) compared with laparoscopic hepatectomy. It is demonstrated that robotic hepatectomy is an outstanding surgical strategy for clinical application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信