凯夫拉/黄麻纤维及混合复合材料压力容器的数值模拟

IF 3.1 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Pranti Saha , Md Foisal Hossain , Muhammed Sohel Rana , Md Shafiul Ferdous
{"title":"凯夫拉/黄麻纤维及混合复合材料压力容器的数值模拟","authors":"Pranti Saha ,&nbsp;Md Foisal Hossain ,&nbsp;Muhammed Sohel Rana ,&nbsp;Md Shafiul Ferdous","doi":"10.1016/j.cartre.2023.100304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, nine composite overwrapped pressure vessel (<em>COPV)</em> models (type <em>IV</em>) have been developed to analyze their burst pressure performance using the ultimate tensile strength (<em>UTS)</em> from experiment and the von Mises stress profile from finite element ABAQUS simulation. The four-layer jute-reinforced <em>PV</em> shows almost five times lower burst pressure than Kevlar-based <em>PV</em>, indicating the inherent vulnerability of using pure jute. However, for the hybrid jute/Kevlar alternate combination, <em>JKJK</em> shows strength improvement over a jute <em>PV</em> by almost two times. Other jute hybrids with glass and aluminum foil show very comparable performance when compared to jute <em>PV</em>. Both yarn and braided-type jute fiber exhibit similar operating conditions, indicating that the preparation type of jute fiber is invariant to pressure performance. However, <em>COPVs</em> woven with 90° cross-oriented jute fibers are found to have the most degraded strength, highlighting that fiber orientation remains an important optimization factor in designing <em>PVs</em> with hybrid composite wraps.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52629,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Trends","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical Modeling of Kevlar/Jute Fiber and Hybrid Composite Pressure Vessels\",\"authors\":\"Pranti Saha ,&nbsp;Md Foisal Hossain ,&nbsp;Muhammed Sohel Rana ,&nbsp;Md Shafiul Ferdous\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cartre.2023.100304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this study, nine composite overwrapped pressure vessel (<em>COPV)</em> models (type <em>IV</em>) have been developed to analyze their burst pressure performance using the ultimate tensile strength (<em>UTS)</em> from experiment and the von Mises stress profile from finite element ABAQUS simulation. The four-layer jute-reinforced <em>PV</em> shows almost five times lower burst pressure than Kevlar-based <em>PV</em>, indicating the inherent vulnerability of using pure jute. However, for the hybrid jute/Kevlar alternate combination, <em>JKJK</em> shows strength improvement over a jute <em>PV</em> by almost two times. Other jute hybrids with glass and aluminum foil show very comparable performance when compared to jute <em>PV</em>. Both yarn and braided-type jute fiber exhibit similar operating conditions, indicating that the preparation type of jute fiber is invariant to pressure performance. However, <em>COPVs</em> woven with 90° cross-oriented jute fibers are found to have the most degraded strength, highlighting that fiber orientation remains an important optimization factor in designing <em>PVs</em> with hybrid composite wraps.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Carbon Trends\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Carbon Trends\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667056923000597\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667056923000597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中,开发了九个复合材料外覆压力容器(COPV)模型(IV型),利用实验中的极限抗拉强度(UTS)和有限元ABAQUS模拟中的von Mises应力分布来分析其爆破压力性能。四层黄麻增强PV的爆裂压力几乎是Kevlar基PV的五倍,这表明使用纯黄麻的固有脆弱性。然而,对于混合黄麻/凯夫拉交替组合,JKJK显示出比黄麻PV的强度提高了近两倍。与黄麻PV相比,其他具有玻璃和铝箔的黄麻杂化物表现出非常相似的性能。纱线和编织型黄麻纤维都表现出相似的操作条件,表明黄麻纤维的制备类型对压力性能是不变的。然而,发现用90°交叉定向黄麻纤维编织的COPV的强度下降幅度最大,这突出表明纤维定向仍然是设计具有混合复合材料包裹的PV的重要优化因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Numerical Modeling of Kevlar/Jute Fiber and Hybrid Composite Pressure Vessels

In this study, nine composite overwrapped pressure vessel (COPV) models (type IV) have been developed to analyze their burst pressure performance using the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) from experiment and the von Mises stress profile from finite element ABAQUS simulation. The four-layer jute-reinforced PV shows almost five times lower burst pressure than Kevlar-based PV, indicating the inherent vulnerability of using pure jute. However, for the hybrid jute/Kevlar alternate combination, JKJK shows strength improvement over a jute PV by almost two times. Other jute hybrids with glass and aluminum foil show very comparable performance when compared to jute PV. Both yarn and braided-type jute fiber exhibit similar operating conditions, indicating that the preparation type of jute fiber is invariant to pressure performance. However, COPVs woven with 90° cross-oriented jute fibers are found to have the most degraded strength, highlighting that fiber orientation remains an important optimization factor in designing PVs with hybrid composite wraps.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Carbon Trends
Carbon Trends Materials Science-Materials Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
77 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信