内吞镜检查在食管病变诊断中的应用:一项系统综述和荟萃分析

Lu Wang , Bofu Tang , Feifei Liu, Zhenyu Jiang, Xianmei Meng
{"title":"内吞镜检查在食管病变诊断中的应用:一项系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Lu Wang ,&nbsp;Bofu Tang ,&nbsp;Feifei Liu,&nbsp;Zhenyu Jiang,&nbsp;Xianmei Meng","doi":"10.1016/j.gande.2023.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To systematically evaluate the value of endocytoscopy (ECS) in the diagnosis of early esophageal cancer (EC).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Pubmed, Ovid and EMbase databases were searched to collect diagnostic tests of ECS assisted diagnosis of early EC. The retrieval time was from the establishment of the database to August 2022. Review manager 5.4, Stata 16.0 and Meta-Disc 1.4 were used for meta-analysis after two researchers independently screened literature, extracted data and evaluated the bias risk of included studies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 7 studies were included, including 520 lesions. Meta-analysis results showed that the combined sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and positive posterior probability (PPP) of ECS screening for early EC were 0.95 [95%<em>CI</em>: 0.84, 0.98], 0.92 [95%<em>CI</em>: 0.83, 0.96], 11.8 [95%<em>CI</em>: 5.3, 26.1], 0.06 [95%<em>CI</em>: 0.02, 0.18], 203 [95%<em>CI</em>: 50, 816], and 75%, respectively. The area (AUC) under the summary receiver Operating Characteristic curve (SROC) was 0.98 [95%<em>CI</em>: 0.96, 0.99].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Current evidence suggests that ECS can be used as an effective screening tool for early EC. Due to the limited number and quality of included studies, it is imperative to conduct more high-quality studies to verify the above conclusions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100571,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology & Endoscopy","volume":"1 1","pages":"Pages 12-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The diagnostic utility of endocytoscopy for the detection of esophageal lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Lu Wang ,&nbsp;Bofu Tang ,&nbsp;Feifei Liu,&nbsp;Zhenyu Jiang,&nbsp;Xianmei Meng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gande.2023.01.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To systematically evaluate the value of endocytoscopy (ECS) in the diagnosis of early esophageal cancer (EC).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Pubmed, Ovid and EMbase databases were searched to collect diagnostic tests of ECS assisted diagnosis of early EC. The retrieval time was from the establishment of the database to August 2022. Review manager 5.4, Stata 16.0 and Meta-Disc 1.4 were used for meta-analysis after two researchers independently screened literature, extracted data and evaluated the bias risk of included studies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 7 studies were included, including 520 lesions. Meta-analysis results showed that the combined sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and positive posterior probability (PPP) of ECS screening for early EC were 0.95 [95%<em>CI</em>: 0.84, 0.98], 0.92 [95%<em>CI</em>: 0.83, 0.96], 11.8 [95%<em>CI</em>: 5.3, 26.1], 0.06 [95%<em>CI</em>: 0.02, 0.18], 203 [95%<em>CI</em>: 50, 816], and 75%, respectively. The area (AUC) under the summary receiver Operating Characteristic curve (SROC) was 0.98 [95%<em>CI</em>: 0.96, 0.99].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Current evidence suggests that ECS can be used as an effective screening tool for early EC. Due to the limited number and quality of included studies, it is imperative to conduct more high-quality studies to verify the above conclusions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastroenterology & Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 12-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastroenterology & Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294975232300002X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology & Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294975232300002X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的系统评价内镜检查(ECS)对癌症早期诊断的价值。方法检索Pubmed、Ovid和EMbase数据库,收集ECS辅助诊断早期食管癌的诊断结果,检索时间为数据库建立至2022年8月。在两名研究人员独立筛选文献、提取数据并评估纳入研究的偏倚风险后,使用Review manager 5.4、Stata 16.0和Meta Disc 1.4进行荟萃分析。结果共纳入7项研究,包括520个病变。荟萃分析结果显示,早期EC ECS筛查的综合敏感性(SE)、特异性(SP)、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)、诊断优势比(DOR)和阳性后验概率(PPP)分别为0.95[95%CI:0.84、0.98]、0.92[95%CI:0.83、0.96]、11.8[95%CI:5.3、26.1]、0.06[95%CI:0.02、0.18]、203[95%CI+50816]和75%,分别地总结受试者工作特征曲线(SROC)下的面积(AUC)为0.98[95%CI:0.96,0.99]。结论目前的证据表明,ECS可以作为早期EC的有效筛查工具。由于纳入研究的数量和质量有限,必须进行更多高质量的研究来验证上述结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The diagnostic utility of endocytoscopy for the detection of esophageal lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To systematically evaluate the value of endocytoscopy (ECS) in the diagnosis of early esophageal cancer (EC).

Methods

Pubmed, Ovid and EMbase databases were searched to collect diagnostic tests of ECS assisted diagnosis of early EC. The retrieval time was from the establishment of the database to August 2022. Review manager 5.4, Stata 16.0 and Meta-Disc 1.4 were used for meta-analysis after two researchers independently screened literature, extracted data and evaluated the bias risk of included studies.

Results

A total of 7 studies were included, including 520 lesions. Meta-analysis results showed that the combined sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and positive posterior probability (PPP) of ECS screening for early EC were 0.95 [95%CI: 0.84, 0.98], 0.92 [95%CI: 0.83, 0.96], 11.8 [95%CI: 5.3, 26.1], 0.06 [95%CI: 0.02, 0.18], 203 [95%CI: 50, 816], and 75%, respectively. The area (AUC) under the summary receiver Operating Characteristic curve (SROC) was 0.98 [95%CI: 0.96, 0.99].

Conclusions

Current evidence suggests that ECS can be used as an effective screening tool for early EC. Due to the limited number and quality of included studies, it is imperative to conduct more high-quality studies to verify the above conclusions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信