田间喷洒抗生素对梨园蜜蜂采食行为和授粉的影响

IF 6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Laura Avila , Christopher McCullough , Annie Schiffer , JoMari Moreno , Neha Ganjur , Zachary Ofenloch , Tianna DuPont , Louis Nottingham , Nicole M. Gerardo , Berry J. Brosi
{"title":"田间喷洒抗生素对梨园蜜蜂采食行为和授粉的影响","authors":"Laura Avila ,&nbsp;Christopher McCullough ,&nbsp;Annie Schiffer ,&nbsp;JoMari Moreno ,&nbsp;Neha Ganjur ,&nbsp;Zachary Ofenloch ,&nbsp;Tianna DuPont ,&nbsp;Louis Nottingham ,&nbsp;Nicole M. Gerardo ,&nbsp;Berry J. Brosi","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2023.108757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Broadcast spraying of antibiotics in crops is widely used for controlling bacterial plant pathogens. The effects of antibiotics on non-target (and especially beneficial) organisms in cropping systems, however, are not well studied. </span>Pollinators are of particular concern because in pear and apple crops, antibiotics for controlling fire blight (</span><span><em>Erwinia amylovora</em></span><span>) are sprayed during bloom, likely exposing pollinators. This is especially relevant as laboratory evidence suggests that antibiotics could have sublethal effects on bee<span> foraging behavior and colony health. But to our knowledge these potential impacts have not been studied in field settings. Here, we compared the effects of two fire blight control methods, a single spray of an antibiotic (oxytetracycline) and a biological antagonist (</span></span><span><em>Aureobasidium pullulans</em></span>), on honey bee (<span><em>Apis mellifera</em></span>) foraging, pollination, and fruit set in pear orchards. Complementing these field assessments, we conducted laboratory experiments to examine the effects of these treatments on locomotion and foraging behavior of a bumble bee species, <span><em>Bombus</em><em> vosnesenskii</em></span>. We found that honey bees visited fewer flowers and foraged longer on each flower in orchards sprayed with antibiotics than with a biological product, but there were no differences in crop pollination and seed set. The pear cultivars we worked in, however, can self-pollinate. In the lab, we found that feeding on high doses of either the antibiotic or the biological antagonist reduced bumble bee foraging relative to controls. The limited impact of antibiotics on pear pollination observed in this study suggest that antibiotics pose a low economic risk to pear growers, especially for self-compatible cultivars. Still, crops with higher pollinator dependence may be affected by reductions in bee visitation. Future studies should examine the impacts of multiple antibiotic sprays within a season, which are common during warm springs, and their long-term health impacts on both individual bees and colonies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"359 ","pages":"Article 108757"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of a field-sprayed antibiotic on bee foraging behavior and pollination in pear orchards\",\"authors\":\"Laura Avila ,&nbsp;Christopher McCullough ,&nbsp;Annie Schiffer ,&nbsp;JoMari Moreno ,&nbsp;Neha Ganjur ,&nbsp;Zachary Ofenloch ,&nbsp;Tianna DuPont ,&nbsp;Louis Nottingham ,&nbsp;Nicole M. Gerardo ,&nbsp;Berry J. Brosi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agee.2023.108757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>Broadcast spraying of antibiotics in crops is widely used for controlling bacterial plant pathogens. The effects of antibiotics on non-target (and especially beneficial) organisms in cropping systems, however, are not well studied. </span>Pollinators are of particular concern because in pear and apple crops, antibiotics for controlling fire blight (</span><span><em>Erwinia amylovora</em></span><span>) are sprayed during bloom, likely exposing pollinators. This is especially relevant as laboratory evidence suggests that antibiotics could have sublethal effects on bee<span> foraging behavior and colony health. But to our knowledge these potential impacts have not been studied in field settings. Here, we compared the effects of two fire blight control methods, a single spray of an antibiotic (oxytetracycline) and a biological antagonist (</span></span><span><em>Aureobasidium pullulans</em></span>), on honey bee (<span><em>Apis mellifera</em></span>) foraging, pollination, and fruit set in pear orchards. Complementing these field assessments, we conducted laboratory experiments to examine the effects of these treatments on locomotion and foraging behavior of a bumble bee species, <span><em>Bombus</em><em> vosnesenskii</em></span>. We found that honey bees visited fewer flowers and foraged longer on each flower in orchards sprayed with antibiotics than with a biological product, but there were no differences in crop pollination and seed set. The pear cultivars we worked in, however, can self-pollinate. In the lab, we found that feeding on high doses of either the antibiotic or the biological antagonist reduced bumble bee foraging relative to controls. The limited impact of antibiotics on pear pollination observed in this study suggest that antibiotics pose a low economic risk to pear growers, especially for self-compatible cultivars. Still, crops with higher pollinator dependence may be affected by reductions in bee visitation. Future studies should examine the impacts of multiple antibiotic sprays within a season, which are common during warm springs, and their long-term health impacts on both individual bees and colonies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment\",\"volume\":\"359 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108757\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880923004164\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880923004164","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在作物中喷洒抗生素被广泛用于控制细菌性植物病原体。然而,抗生素对种植系统中非目标(尤其是有益)生物的影响还没有得到很好的研究。授粉者尤其关注,因为在梨和苹果作物中,在开花期间喷洒用于控制火疫病的抗生素,很可能会暴露给授粉者。这一点尤其重要,因为实验室证据表明,抗生素可能对蜜蜂的觅食行为和蜂群健康产生亚致死影响。但据我们所知,这些潜在影响尚未在实地环境中进行研究。在这里,我们比较了两种防治火疫病的方法,一种是单次喷洒抗生素(土霉素),另一种是生物拮抗剂(出芽短梗霉),对蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)在梨园觅食、授粉和结实的影响。作为对这些实地评估的补充,我们进行了实验室实验,以检验这些处理对大黄蜂(Bombus vosnesenskii)运动和觅食行为的影响。我们发现,在喷洒抗生素的果园里,蜜蜂造访的花朵更少,对每朵花的觅食时间也更长,但在作物授粉和结实方面没有差异。然而,我们研究的梨品种可以自行授粉。在实验室中,我们发现,与对照组相比,喂食高剂量的抗生素或生物拮抗剂可以减少大黄蜂的觅食。本研究中观察到的抗生素对梨授粉的影响有限,这表明抗生素对梨种植者,特别是对自交品种来说,经济风险较低。尽管如此,对传粉昆虫依赖性较高的作物可能会受到蜜蜂造访次数减少的影响。未来的研究应该检查一个季节内多种抗生素喷雾的影响,这种情况在温暖的春天很常见,以及它们对单个蜜蜂和蜂群的长期健康影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of a field-sprayed antibiotic on bee foraging behavior and pollination in pear orchards

Broadcast spraying of antibiotics in crops is widely used for controlling bacterial plant pathogens. The effects of antibiotics on non-target (and especially beneficial) organisms in cropping systems, however, are not well studied. Pollinators are of particular concern because in pear and apple crops, antibiotics for controlling fire blight (Erwinia amylovora) are sprayed during bloom, likely exposing pollinators. This is especially relevant as laboratory evidence suggests that antibiotics could have sublethal effects on bee foraging behavior and colony health. But to our knowledge these potential impacts have not been studied in field settings. Here, we compared the effects of two fire blight control methods, a single spray of an antibiotic (oxytetracycline) and a biological antagonist (Aureobasidium pullulans), on honey bee (Apis mellifera) foraging, pollination, and fruit set in pear orchards. Complementing these field assessments, we conducted laboratory experiments to examine the effects of these treatments on locomotion and foraging behavior of a bumble bee species, Bombus vosnesenskii. We found that honey bees visited fewer flowers and foraged longer on each flower in orchards sprayed with antibiotics than with a biological product, but there were no differences in crop pollination and seed set. The pear cultivars we worked in, however, can self-pollinate. In the lab, we found that feeding on high doses of either the antibiotic or the biological antagonist reduced bumble bee foraging relative to controls. The limited impact of antibiotics on pear pollination observed in this study suggest that antibiotics pose a low economic risk to pear growers, especially for self-compatible cultivars. Still, crops with higher pollinator dependence may be affected by reductions in bee visitation. Future studies should examine the impacts of multiple antibiotic sprays within a season, which are common during warm springs, and their long-term health impacts on both individual bees and colonies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信