甲状腺功能减退结节细针活检的正确和不正确建议:不同基于超声的风险分层系统的性能。

IF 1.2
Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-23 DOI:10.1055/a-2178-6739
Manuela Petersen, Simone A Schenke, Philipp Seifert, Alexander R Stahl, Rainer Görges, Michael Grunert, Burkhard Klemenz, Michael C Kreissl, Michael Zimny
{"title":"甲状腺功能减退结节细针活检的正确和不正确建议:不同基于超声的风险分层系统的性能。","authors":"Manuela Petersen, Simone A Schenke, Philipp Seifert, Alexander R Stahl, Rainer Görges, Michael Grunert, Burkhard Klemenz, Michael C Kreissl, Michael Zimny","doi":"10.1055/a-2178-6739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong> To evaluate the recommendations for or against fine needle biopsy (FNB) of hypofunctioning thyroid nodules (TNs) using of five different Ultrasound (US) -based risk stratification systems (RSSs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> German multicenter study with 563 TNs (≥ 10 mm) in 534 patients who underwent thyroid US and surgery. All TNs were evaluated with ACR TI-RADS, EU-TIRADS, ATA, K-TIRADS 2016 and modified K-TIRADS 2021. A correct recommendation was defined as: malignant TN with recommendation for FNB (appropriate) or benign TN without recommendation for FNB (avoided). An incorrect recommendation was defined as: malignant TN without recommendation for FNB (missed) or benign TN with recommendation for FNB (unnecessary).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> ACR TI-RADS demonstrated the highest rate of correct (42.3 %) and lowest rate of incorrect recommendations (57.7 %). The other RRSs showed similar results for correct (26.5 %-35.7 %) and incorrect (64.3 %-73.5 %) recommendations. ACR TI-RADS demonstrated the lowest rate of unnecessary (73.4 %) and the highest rate of appropriate (26.6 %) FNB recommendation. For other RSSs, the rates of unnecessary and appropriate FNB were between 75.2 %-77.1 % and 22.9 %-24.8 %. The lowest rate of missed FNB (14.7 %) and the highest rate of avoided FNB (85.3 %) was found for ACR TI-RADS. For the other RSSs, the rates of missed and avoided FNB were between 17.8 %-26.9 % and 73.1 %-82.2 %. When the size cutoff was disregarded, an increase of correct recommendations and a decrease of incorrect recommendations was observed for all RSSs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The RSSs vary in their ability to correctly recommend for or against FNB. An understanding of the impact of nodule size cutoffs seems necessary for the future of TIRADS.</p>","PeriodicalId":94161,"journal":{"name":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","volume":" ","pages":"21-33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correct and Incorrect Recommendations for or against Fine Needle Biopsies of Hypofunctioning Thyroid Nodules: Performance of Different Ultrasound-based Risk Stratification Systems.\",\"authors\":\"Manuela Petersen, Simone A Schenke, Philipp Seifert, Alexander R Stahl, Rainer Görges, Michael Grunert, Burkhard Klemenz, Michael C Kreissl, Michael Zimny\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2178-6739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong> To evaluate the recommendations for or against fine needle biopsy (FNB) of hypofunctioning thyroid nodules (TNs) using of five different Ultrasound (US) -based risk stratification systems (RSSs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> German multicenter study with 563 TNs (≥ 10 mm) in 534 patients who underwent thyroid US and surgery. All TNs were evaluated with ACR TI-RADS, EU-TIRADS, ATA, K-TIRADS 2016 and modified K-TIRADS 2021. A correct recommendation was defined as: malignant TN with recommendation for FNB (appropriate) or benign TN without recommendation for FNB (avoided). An incorrect recommendation was defined as: malignant TN without recommendation for FNB (missed) or benign TN with recommendation for FNB (unnecessary).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> ACR TI-RADS demonstrated the highest rate of correct (42.3 %) and lowest rate of incorrect recommendations (57.7 %). The other RRSs showed similar results for correct (26.5 %-35.7 %) and incorrect (64.3 %-73.5 %) recommendations. ACR TI-RADS demonstrated the lowest rate of unnecessary (73.4 %) and the highest rate of appropriate (26.6 %) FNB recommendation. For other RSSs, the rates of unnecessary and appropriate FNB were between 75.2 %-77.1 % and 22.9 %-24.8 %. The lowest rate of missed FNB (14.7 %) and the highest rate of avoided FNB (85.3 %) was found for ACR TI-RADS. For the other RSSs, the rates of missed and avoided FNB were between 17.8 %-26.9 % and 73.1 %-82.2 %. When the size cutoff was disregarded, an increase of correct recommendations and a decrease of incorrect recommendations was observed for all RSSs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The RSSs vary in their ability to correctly recommend for or against FNB. An understanding of the impact of nodule size cutoffs seems necessary for the future of TIRADS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"21-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2178-6739\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2178-6739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的: 使用五种不同的基于超声(US)的风险分层系统(RSSs)来评估功能低下甲状腺结节(TNs)细针活检(FNB)的建议。方法: 德国多中心研究,563例TNs(≥ 10 mm)在534例接受甲状腺超声检查和手术的患者中。所有TNs均采用ACR TI-RADS、EU-TIRADS、ATA、K-TIRADS 2016和改良K-TIRADS 2021进行评估。正确的建议被定义为:恶性TN并推荐FNB(适当)或良性TN但不建议FNB(避免)。不正确的建议被定义为:未推荐FNB的恶性TN(遗漏)或推荐FNB(不必要)的良性TN。结果: ACR TI-RADS的正确率最高(42.3 %) 错误建议率最低(57.7 %). 其他RRS的正确性(26.5 %-35.7 %) 和不正确(64.3 %-73.5 %) 建议。ACR TI-RADS显示不必要的发生率最低(73.4 %) 和最高的适当比率(26.6 %) FNB建议。对于其他RSSs,不必要和适当的FNB发生率在75.2之间 %-77.1 % 和22.9 %-24.8 %. FNB漏诊率最低(14.7 %) 避免FNB的比率最高(85.3 %) 发现了ACR TI-RADS。 对于其他RSSs,遗漏和避免FNB的比率在17.8之间 %-26.9 % 和73.1 %-82.2 %. 当忽略大小截止值时,所有RSS的正确建议增加,不正确建议减少。结论: RSSs在正确推荐支持或反对FNB的能力方面各不相同。了解结节大小截断的影响似乎对TIRADS的未来是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Correct and Incorrect Recommendations for or against Fine Needle Biopsies of Hypofunctioning Thyroid Nodules: Performance of Different Ultrasound-based Risk Stratification Systems.

Purpose:  To evaluate the recommendations for or against fine needle biopsy (FNB) of hypofunctioning thyroid nodules (TNs) using of five different Ultrasound (US) -based risk stratification systems (RSSs).

Methods:  German multicenter study with 563 TNs (≥ 10 mm) in 534 patients who underwent thyroid US and surgery. All TNs were evaluated with ACR TI-RADS, EU-TIRADS, ATA, K-TIRADS 2016 and modified K-TIRADS 2021. A correct recommendation was defined as: malignant TN with recommendation for FNB (appropriate) or benign TN without recommendation for FNB (avoided). An incorrect recommendation was defined as: malignant TN without recommendation for FNB (missed) or benign TN with recommendation for FNB (unnecessary).

Results:  ACR TI-RADS demonstrated the highest rate of correct (42.3 %) and lowest rate of incorrect recommendations (57.7 %). The other RRSs showed similar results for correct (26.5 %-35.7 %) and incorrect (64.3 %-73.5 %) recommendations. ACR TI-RADS demonstrated the lowest rate of unnecessary (73.4 %) and the highest rate of appropriate (26.6 %) FNB recommendation. For other RSSs, the rates of unnecessary and appropriate FNB were between 75.2 %-77.1 % and 22.9 %-24.8 %. The lowest rate of missed FNB (14.7 %) and the highest rate of avoided FNB (85.3 %) was found for ACR TI-RADS. For the other RSSs, the rates of missed and avoided FNB were between 17.8 %-26.9 % and 73.1 %-82.2 %. When the size cutoff was disregarded, an increase of correct recommendations and a decrease of incorrect recommendations was observed for all RSSs.

Conclusion:  The RSSs vary in their ability to correctly recommend for or against FNB. An understanding of the impact of nodule size cutoffs seems necessary for the future of TIRADS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信