Kjersti Sandnes, Silja B. Kårstad, Stian Lydersen, Turid Suzanne Berg-Nielsen
{"title":"母亲对婴儿表现的变化是否与观察到的母婴互动质量的变化有关?","authors":"Kjersti Sandnes, Silja B. Kårstad, Stian Lydersen, Turid Suzanne Berg-Nielsen","doi":"10.1016/j.infbeh.2023.101896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Infant mental health clinicians aiming to improve mother–infant dyads at risk typically target mothers’ representations of their infant or mother–infant interactions, assuming that one port of entry leads to change in the other. However, little is known about the relation between changes in mothers’ representations and in mother–infant interactions. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate this in a low- to moderate-risk community sample of 152 mothers (<em>M</em> = 29.7 years) of infants aged 0–2 years (<em>M</em> = 11.5 months) recruited from rural and urban cities in Norway. The mothers’ representations were measured using the Working Model of the Child Interview, and the quality of the mother–infant interactions was measured with the Emotional Availability Scales. We found no evidence of a relation between mothers’ changed representations and changed quality of mother–infant interactions. Several explanations concerning the low-risk status of the sample, the observation situation, the time between assessment points, and the homogeneous scores from the instruments used are discussed, as are the implications for clinical practice and future research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48222,"journal":{"name":"Infant Behavior & Development","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 101896"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are changes in mothers’ representations of their infants related to changes in observed mother–infant interaction quality?\",\"authors\":\"Kjersti Sandnes, Silja B. Kårstad, Stian Lydersen, Turid Suzanne Berg-Nielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.infbeh.2023.101896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Infant mental health clinicians aiming to improve mother–infant dyads at risk typically target mothers’ representations of their infant or mother–infant interactions, assuming that one port of entry leads to change in the other. However, little is known about the relation between changes in mothers’ representations and in mother–infant interactions. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate this in a low- to moderate-risk community sample of 152 mothers (<em>M</em> = 29.7 years) of infants aged 0–2 years (<em>M</em> = 11.5 months) recruited from rural and urban cities in Norway. The mothers’ representations were measured using the Working Model of the Child Interview, and the quality of the mother–infant interactions was measured with the Emotional Availability Scales. We found no evidence of a relation between mothers’ changed representations and changed quality of mother–infant interactions. Several explanations concerning the low-risk status of the sample, the observation situation, the time between assessment points, and the homogeneous scores from the instruments used are discussed, as are the implications for clinical practice and future research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infant Behavior & Development\",\"volume\":\"73 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101896\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infant Behavior & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638323000887\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infant Behavior & Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638323000887","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Are changes in mothers’ representations of their infants related to changes in observed mother–infant interaction quality?
Infant mental health clinicians aiming to improve mother–infant dyads at risk typically target mothers’ representations of their infant or mother–infant interactions, assuming that one port of entry leads to change in the other. However, little is known about the relation between changes in mothers’ representations and in mother–infant interactions. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate this in a low- to moderate-risk community sample of 152 mothers (M = 29.7 years) of infants aged 0–2 years (M = 11.5 months) recruited from rural and urban cities in Norway. The mothers’ representations were measured using the Working Model of the Child Interview, and the quality of the mother–infant interactions was measured with the Emotional Availability Scales. We found no evidence of a relation between mothers’ changed representations and changed quality of mother–infant interactions. Several explanations concerning the low-risk status of the sample, the observation situation, the time between assessment points, and the homogeneous scores from the instruments used are discussed, as are the implications for clinical practice and future research.
期刊介绍:
Infant Behavior & Development publishes empirical (fundamental and clinical), theoretical, methodological and review papers. Brief reports dealing with behavioral development during infancy (up to 3 years) will also be considered. Papers of an inter- and multidisciplinary nature, for example neuroscience, non-linear dynamics and modelling approaches, are particularly encouraged. Areas covered by the journal include cognitive development, emotional development, perception, perception-action coupling, motor development and socialisation.