提高早产儿独立口服喂养成就的干预措施:范围界定综述。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Samiira Omar Sheikh-Mohamed, Hillary Wilson, Sandra Fucile
{"title":"提高早产儿独立口服喂养成就的干预措施:范围界定综述。","authors":"Samiira Omar Sheikh-Mohamed, Hillary Wilson, Sandra Fucile","doi":"10.1080/01942638.2023.2271064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at facilitating the transition from full tube to independent oral feeds in premature infants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Scoping review methodology using the Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA_ScR). A search of six databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, COCHRANE, and OT Seeker), using keywords related to oral feeding and premature infants retrieved 11,870 articles. Full-text screening was completed for 36 articles, and 21 articles were included in this review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Review of the 21 articles revealed five intervention types: oral stimulation (<i>n</i> = 14), swallow/gustatory stimulation (<i>n</i> = 3), olfactory stimulation (<i>n</i> = 2), tactile/kinesthetic stimulation (<i>n</i> = 1), and auditory stimulation (<i>n</i> = 1). Oral stimulation had the most studies with consistent evidence supporting its beneficial effect to facilitate achievement to independent oral feeds, swallow/gustatory stimulation appeared to have some benefit, but evidence for olfactory, tactile/kinesthetic, and auditory stimulation was sparse.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Oral stimulation has the most studies with consistent evidence, and thus is suggested as a suitable early intervention strategy that can be used by health providers to facilitate the achievement to independent oral feeds in premature infants. The alternate forms of stimulation have limited evidence and necessitate further studies to confirm their benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":49138,"journal":{"name":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"295-315"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interventions to Enhance Achievement to Independent Oral Feeds in Premature Infants: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Samiira Omar Sheikh-Mohamed, Hillary Wilson, Sandra Fucile\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01942638.2023.2271064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at facilitating the transition from full tube to independent oral feeds in premature infants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Scoping review methodology using the Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA_ScR). A search of six databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, COCHRANE, and OT Seeker), using keywords related to oral feeding and premature infants retrieved 11,870 articles. Full-text screening was completed for 36 articles, and 21 articles were included in this review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Review of the 21 articles revealed five intervention types: oral stimulation (<i>n</i> = 14), swallow/gustatory stimulation (<i>n</i> = 3), olfactory stimulation (<i>n</i> = 2), tactile/kinesthetic stimulation (<i>n</i> = 1), and auditory stimulation (<i>n</i> = 1). Oral stimulation had the most studies with consistent evidence supporting its beneficial effect to facilitate achievement to independent oral feeds, swallow/gustatory stimulation appeared to have some benefit, but evidence for olfactory, tactile/kinesthetic, and auditory stimulation was sparse.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Oral stimulation has the most studies with consistent evidence, and thus is suggested as a suitable early intervention strategy that can be used by health providers to facilitate the achievement to independent oral feeds in premature infants. The alternate forms of stimulation have limited evidence and necessitate further studies to confirm their benefits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"295-315\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2023.2271064\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2023.2271064","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估旨在促进早产儿从全管喂养过渡到独立口服喂养的干预措施的有效性。方法:使用系统评价首选报告项目的范围界定审查方法和范围界定审查的荟萃分析扩展(PRISMA_ScR)。使用与口腔喂养和早产儿相关的关键词搜索六个数据库(EMBASE、MEDLINE、CINAHL、Web of Science、COCHRANE和OT Seeker),检索到11870篇文章。完成了36篇文章的全文筛选,21篇文章被纳入本综述。结果:对21篇文章的回顾揭示了五种干预类型:口腔刺激(n = 14) ,吞咽/味觉刺激(n = 3) ,嗅觉刺激(n = 2) ,触觉/动觉刺激(n = 1) 和听觉刺激(n = 1) 。口腔刺激的研究最多,有一致的证据支持其有益效果,有助于实现独立的口腔喂养,吞咽/味觉刺激似乎有一些好处,但嗅觉、触觉/动觉和听觉刺激的证据很少。结论:口腔刺激的研究最多,证据一致,因此被建议作为一种合适的早期干预策略,可供卫生服务提供者使用,以促进早产儿获得独立的口腔喂养。替代形式的刺激证据有限,需要进一步研究以确认其益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interventions to Enhance Achievement to Independent Oral Feeds in Premature Infants: A Scoping Review.

Aim: To assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at facilitating the transition from full tube to independent oral feeds in premature infants.

Methods: Scoping review methodology using the Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA_ScR). A search of six databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, COCHRANE, and OT Seeker), using keywords related to oral feeding and premature infants retrieved 11,870 articles. Full-text screening was completed for 36 articles, and 21 articles were included in this review.

Results: Review of the 21 articles revealed five intervention types: oral stimulation (n = 14), swallow/gustatory stimulation (n = 3), olfactory stimulation (n = 2), tactile/kinesthetic stimulation (n = 1), and auditory stimulation (n = 1). Oral stimulation had the most studies with consistent evidence supporting its beneficial effect to facilitate achievement to independent oral feeds, swallow/gustatory stimulation appeared to have some benefit, but evidence for olfactory, tactile/kinesthetic, and auditory stimulation was sparse.

Conclusion: Oral stimulation has the most studies with consistent evidence, and thus is suggested as a suitable early intervention strategy that can be used by health providers to facilitate the achievement to independent oral feeds in premature infants. The alternate forms of stimulation have limited evidence and necessitate further studies to confirm their benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: 5 issues per year Abstracted and/or indexed in: AMED; British Library Inside; Child Development Abstracts; CINAHL; Contents Pages in Education; EBSCO; Education Research Abstracts (ERA); Education Resources Information Center (ERIC); EMCARE; Excerpta Medica/EMBASE; Family and Society Studies Worldwide; Family Index Database; Google Scholar; HaPI Database; HINARI; Index Copernicus; Intute; JournalSeek; MANTIS; MEDLINE; NewJour; OCLC; OTDBASE; OT SEARCH; Otseeker; PEDro; ProQuest; PsycINFO; PSYCLINE; PubsHub; PubMed; REHABDATA; SCOPUS; SIRC; Social Work Abstracts; Speical Educational Needs Abstracts; SwetsWise; Zetoc (British Library); Science Citation Index Expanded (also known as SciSearch®); Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition; Social Sciences Citation Index®; Journal Citation Reports/ Social Sciences Edition; Current Contents®/Social and Behavioral Sciences; Current Contents®/Clinical Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信