复杂创伤后应激障碍的阶段性治疗、长期暴露和技能训练的比较:一项随机对照试验。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Peter Sele , Asle Hoffart , Marylène Cloitre , Elizabeth Hembree , Tuva Øktedalen
{"title":"复杂创伤后应激障碍的阶段性治疗、长期暴露和技能训练的比较:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Peter Sele ,&nbsp;Asle Hoffart ,&nbsp;Marylène Cloitre ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Hembree ,&nbsp;Tuva Øktedalen","doi":"10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study examines treatment effects in STAIR Narrative Therapy (SNT), a phase-based treatment where Skills Training in Affective and Interpersonal Regulation (STAIR) precedes Narrative Therapy (NT), compared to Prolonged Exposure (PE) and to STAIR.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Ninety-two adult patients diagnosed with DSM-5 PTSD and ICD-11 CPTSD following childhood abuse were randomly assigned to enhanced versions of SNT (12 group STAIR sessions + 8 individual NT sessions), PE (8–16 individual sessions), or STAIR (12 group STAIR sessions) provided in residential care. Outcome was assessed by mixed models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>PE produced greater improvements in DSM-5 PTSD symptoms compared to SNT from pre-treatment to post-treatment, but not compared to STAIR. Reductions in ICD-11 CPTSD symptoms were not significantly different among conditions. From pre-treatment to 1 year follow-up, PE produced greater PTSD symptom improvements than SNT and STAIR, and PE and STAIR produced greater CPTSD symptom improvements than SNT.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The predicted stronger effect of SNT compared to PE and STAIR on DSM-5 PTSD and ICD-11 CPTSD symptoms was not supported by the findings. The benefits of immediate trauma-focused treatments (TFT) as compared to phase-based treatments, and the potential non-inferiority of skills-training as compared to TFT in CPTSD needs to be further investigated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing phase-based treatment, prolonged exposure, and skills-training for Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Peter Sele ,&nbsp;Asle Hoffart ,&nbsp;Marylène Cloitre ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Hembree ,&nbsp;Tuva Øktedalen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study examines treatment effects in STAIR Narrative Therapy (SNT), a phase-based treatment where Skills Training in Affective and Interpersonal Regulation (STAIR) precedes Narrative Therapy (NT), compared to Prolonged Exposure (PE) and to STAIR.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Ninety-two adult patients diagnosed with DSM-5 PTSD and ICD-11 CPTSD following childhood abuse were randomly assigned to enhanced versions of SNT (12 group STAIR sessions + 8 individual NT sessions), PE (8–16 individual sessions), or STAIR (12 group STAIR sessions) provided in residential care. Outcome was assessed by mixed models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>PE produced greater improvements in DSM-5 PTSD symptoms compared to SNT from pre-treatment to post-treatment, but not compared to STAIR. Reductions in ICD-11 CPTSD symptoms were not significantly different among conditions. From pre-treatment to 1 year follow-up, PE produced greater PTSD symptom improvements than SNT and STAIR, and PE and STAIR produced greater CPTSD symptom improvements than SNT.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The predicted stronger effect of SNT compared to PE and STAIR on DSM-5 PTSD and ICD-11 CPTSD symptoms was not supported by the findings. The benefits of immediate trauma-focused treatments (TFT) as compared to phase-based treatments, and the potential non-inferiority of skills-training as compared to TFT in CPTSD needs to be further investigated.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anxiety Disorders\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anxiety Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088761852300124X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088761852300124X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究考察了STAIR叙事治疗(SNT)的治疗效果,这是一种基于阶段的治疗,情感和人际调节技能训练(STAIR)先于叙事治疗(NT),方法:92名儿童期虐待后被诊断为DSM-5 PTSD和ICD-11 CPTSD的成年患者被随机分配到寄宿护理中提供的强化版SNT(12组STAIR疗程+8个单独NT疗程)、PE(8-16个单独疗程)或STAIR(12组STIR疗程)。结果采用混合模型进行评估。结果:从治疗前到治疗后,与SNT相比,PE对DSM-5 PTSD症状的改善更大,但与STAIR相比没有。ICD-11 CPTSD症状的减少在不同条件下没有显著差异。从治疗前到1年随访,PE比SNT和STAIR对PTSD症状的改善更大,PE和STAIR比SNT对CPTSD症状的改善更强。与基于阶段的治疗相比,以创伤为中心的即时治疗(TFT)的益处,以及在CPTSD中,与TFT相比,技能培训的潜在非劣效性需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing phase-based treatment, prolonged exposure, and skills-training for Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A randomized controlled trial

Objective

This study examines treatment effects in STAIR Narrative Therapy (SNT), a phase-based treatment where Skills Training in Affective and Interpersonal Regulation (STAIR) precedes Narrative Therapy (NT), compared to Prolonged Exposure (PE) and to STAIR.

Method

Ninety-two adult patients diagnosed with DSM-5 PTSD and ICD-11 CPTSD following childhood abuse were randomly assigned to enhanced versions of SNT (12 group STAIR sessions + 8 individual NT sessions), PE (8–16 individual sessions), or STAIR (12 group STAIR sessions) provided in residential care. Outcome was assessed by mixed models.

Results

PE produced greater improvements in DSM-5 PTSD symptoms compared to SNT from pre-treatment to post-treatment, but not compared to STAIR. Reductions in ICD-11 CPTSD symptoms were not significantly different among conditions. From pre-treatment to 1 year follow-up, PE produced greater PTSD symptom improvements than SNT and STAIR, and PE and STAIR produced greater CPTSD symptom improvements than SNT.

Conclusions

The predicted stronger effect of SNT compared to PE and STAIR on DSM-5 PTSD and ICD-11 CPTSD symptoms was not supported by the findings. The benefits of immediate trauma-focused treatments (TFT) as compared to phase-based treatments, and the potential non-inferiority of skills-training as compared to TFT in CPTSD needs to be further investigated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anxiety Disorders is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes research papers on all aspects of anxiety disorders for individuals of all age groups, including children, adolescents, adults, and the elderly. Manuscripts that focus on disorders previously classified as anxiety disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder, as well as the new category of illness anxiety disorder, are also within the scope of the journal. The research areas of focus include traditional, behavioral, cognitive, and biological assessment; diagnosis and classification; psychosocial and psychopharmacological treatment; genetics; epidemiology; and prevention. The journal welcomes theoretical and review articles that significantly contribute to current knowledge in the field. It is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Elsevier, BIOBASE, PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, BIOSIS Citation Index, BRS Data, Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences, Pascal Francis, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信