基于伊斯兰法律准则的人工授精技术与体外受精的伦理法律分析。

IF 1.4 Q2 ETHICS
Sayyed Mohamed Muhsin, Alexis Heng Boon Chin, Aasim Ilyas Padela
{"title":"基于伊斯兰法律准则的人工授精技术与体外受精的伦理法律分析。","authors":"Sayyed Mohamed Muhsin, Alexis Heng Boon Chin, Aasim Ilyas Padela","doi":"10.1080/20502877.2023.2269638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial womb technology for extracorporeal gestation of human offspring (ectogenesis or ectogestation) has profound ethical, sociological and religious implications for Muslim communities. In this article we examine the usage of the technology through the lens of Islamic ethico-legal frameworks specifically the legal maxims (<i>al-Qawaid al-Fiqhiyyah</i>) and higher objectives of Islamic law (<i>Maqaṣid al-Shariah</i>). Our analysis suggests that its application may be contingently permissible (<i>halal</i>) in situations of dire need such as sustaining life and development of extremely premature newborns, for advancing fetal medicine and avoiding maternal co-morbidities during fetal treatment, and for enabling motherhood for women without functional wombs, or who face grave medical risks in pregnancy. However, its application may be proscribed (<i>haram</i>) for enabling healthy women to avoid pregnancy and childbirth, or to achieve parenthood equity. Specification of these views to particular policy, legal contexts and <i>Fatwa</i> will require multidisciplinary <i>Shariah</i>-based bioethical deliberations between jurists, policymakers, and scientists.</p>","PeriodicalId":43760,"journal":{"name":"New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body","volume":" ","pages":"34-46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Ethico-Legal Analysis of Artificial Womb Technology and Extracorporeal Gestation Based on Islamic Legal Maxims.\",\"authors\":\"Sayyed Mohamed Muhsin, Alexis Heng Boon Chin, Aasim Ilyas Padela\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20502877.2023.2269638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Artificial womb technology for extracorporeal gestation of human offspring (ectogenesis or ectogestation) has profound ethical, sociological and religious implications for Muslim communities. In this article we examine the usage of the technology through the lens of Islamic ethico-legal frameworks specifically the legal maxims (<i>al-Qawaid al-Fiqhiyyah</i>) and higher objectives of Islamic law (<i>Maqaṣid al-Shariah</i>). Our analysis suggests that its application may be contingently permissible (<i>halal</i>) in situations of dire need such as sustaining life and development of extremely premature newborns, for advancing fetal medicine and avoiding maternal co-morbidities during fetal treatment, and for enabling motherhood for women without functional wombs, or who face grave medical risks in pregnancy. However, its application may be proscribed (<i>haram</i>) for enabling healthy women to avoid pregnancy and childbirth, or to achieve parenthood equity. Specification of these views to particular policy, legal contexts and <i>Fatwa</i> will require multidisciplinary <i>Shariah</i>-based bioethical deliberations between jurists, policymakers, and scientists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"34-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2023.2269638\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2023.2269638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用于人类后代体外妊娠(体外生殖或体外妊娠)的人工子宫技术对穆斯林社区具有深远的伦理、社会学和宗教意义。在这篇文章中,我们通过伊斯兰伦理法律框架的视角,特别是法律准则(al-Qawaid al-Fiqhiyyah)和伊斯兰法律的更高目标(Maqaṣid al-Shariah)。我们的分析表明,它的应用可能是偶然允许的(清真),用于急需的情况,如维持极早产新生儿的生命和发育,用于推进胎儿医学和避免胎儿治疗期间的母体并发症,以及用于为没有功能性子宫或在怀孕期间面临严重医疗风险的妇女做母亲。然而,它的应用可能会被禁止(haram),因为它使健康女性能够避免怀孕和分娩,或实现为人父母的公平。将这些观点具体化为特定的政策、法律背景和法特瓦,需要法学家、政策制定者和科学家之间进行基于伊斯兰教法的多学科生物伦理审议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Ethico-Legal Analysis of Artificial Womb Technology and Extracorporeal Gestation Based on Islamic Legal Maxims.

Artificial womb technology for extracorporeal gestation of human offspring (ectogenesis or ectogestation) has profound ethical, sociological and religious implications for Muslim communities. In this article we examine the usage of the technology through the lens of Islamic ethico-legal frameworks specifically the legal maxims (al-Qawaid al-Fiqhiyyah) and higher objectives of Islamic law (Maqaṣid al-Shariah). Our analysis suggests that its application may be contingently permissible (halal) in situations of dire need such as sustaining life and development of extremely premature newborns, for advancing fetal medicine and avoiding maternal co-morbidities during fetal treatment, and for enabling motherhood for women without functional wombs, or who face grave medical risks in pregnancy. However, its application may be proscribed (haram) for enabling healthy women to avoid pregnancy and childbirth, or to achieve parenthood equity. Specification of these views to particular policy, legal contexts and Fatwa will require multidisciplinary Shariah-based bioethical deliberations between jurists, policymakers, and scientists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信