CD34+流式细胞仪检测的实验室间方法验证:都灵大都会移植中心的经验。

Q2 Medicine
I F Ivana Ferrero, D R Deborah Rustichelli, S C Sara Castiglia, L G Loretta Gammaitoni, A P Alessandra Polo, M P Marisa Pautasso, M G Massimo Geuna, F F Franca Fagioli
{"title":"CD34+流式细胞仪检测的实验室间方法验证:都灵大都会移植中心的经验。","authors":"I F Ivana Ferrero,&nbsp;D R Deborah Rustichelli,&nbsp;S C Sara Castiglia,&nbsp;L G Loretta Gammaitoni,&nbsp;A P Alessandra Polo,&nbsp;M P Marisa Pautasso,&nbsp;M G Massimo Geuna,&nbsp;F F Franca Fagioli","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Turin Metropolitan Transplant Centre (CIC 305) includes four flow-cytometry laboratories assessing quality control on hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) with different instruments and operators. Therefore, the CD34+ enumeration assay should be validated on a regular basis. We describe here the validation plan to test the inter-laboratory reproducibility of CD34+ enumeration assay, based on the risk analysis. Stabilized blood samples were analysed using Stem-Kit reagent according to manufacturer's instructions and acquired using the Beckman Coulter Navios at Regina Margherita Children's' Hospital (305-1), Beckman Coulter FC500 at Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS (305-2), BD Biosciences FACSLyric™ at S. Luigi Hospital (305-3), and Beckman Coulter Navios EX at Mauriziano Hospital (305-4). The ISHAGE guidelines were followed for estimating % and absolute number of CD34+ cells in single-platform method. For each sample repeatability limit (r), reproducibility error, uncertainty of reproducibility error and coefficient of variation (CV) were reported. The repeated measurements from each laboratory or instrument have a variability, expressed as reproducibility error, lower than the repeatability limit for that single parameter. The corrected reproducibility error is always lower than the repeatability limit except for the percentage value of the \"low\" count. The analysis of inter-laboratory variance is within the maximum acceptable variance value, and the CV of all measurements for each parameter is less than 8%, indicating low measurement variability among laboratories. Evaluating the overall data, we can conclude that the four laboratories are perfectly aligned and the results are reproducible.</p>","PeriodicalId":37192,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","volume":"34 3","pages":"220-227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4e/58/ejifcc-34-220.PMC10588076.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inter-laboratory method validation of CD34+ flow-cytometry assay: the experience of Turin Metropolitan Transplant Centre.\",\"authors\":\"I F Ivana Ferrero,&nbsp;D R Deborah Rustichelli,&nbsp;S C Sara Castiglia,&nbsp;L G Loretta Gammaitoni,&nbsp;A P Alessandra Polo,&nbsp;M P Marisa Pautasso,&nbsp;M G Massimo Geuna,&nbsp;F F Franca Fagioli\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Turin Metropolitan Transplant Centre (CIC 305) includes four flow-cytometry laboratories assessing quality control on hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) with different instruments and operators. Therefore, the CD34+ enumeration assay should be validated on a regular basis. We describe here the validation plan to test the inter-laboratory reproducibility of CD34+ enumeration assay, based on the risk analysis. Stabilized blood samples were analysed using Stem-Kit reagent according to manufacturer's instructions and acquired using the Beckman Coulter Navios at Regina Margherita Children's' Hospital (305-1), Beckman Coulter FC500 at Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS (305-2), BD Biosciences FACSLyric™ at S. Luigi Hospital (305-3), and Beckman Coulter Navios EX at Mauriziano Hospital (305-4). The ISHAGE guidelines were followed for estimating % and absolute number of CD34+ cells in single-platform method. For each sample repeatability limit (r), reproducibility error, uncertainty of reproducibility error and coefficient of variation (CV) were reported. The repeated measurements from each laboratory or instrument have a variability, expressed as reproducibility error, lower than the repeatability limit for that single parameter. The corrected reproducibility error is always lower than the repeatability limit except for the percentage value of the \\\"low\\\" count. The analysis of inter-laboratory variance is within the maximum acceptable variance value, and the CV of all measurements for each parameter is less than 8%, indicating low measurement variability among laboratories. Evaluating the overall data, we can conclude that the four laboratories are perfectly aligned and the results are reproducible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"220-227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4e/58/ejifcc-34-220.PMC10588076.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

都灵大都会移植中心(CIC 305)包括四个流式细胞术实验室,用不同的仪器和操作员评估造血干细胞(HSC)的质量控制。因此,CD34+计数测定应定期进行验证。我们在此描述了基于风险分析的验证计划,以测试CD34+计数测定的实验室间再现性。根据制造商的说明,使用Stem-Kit试剂分析稳定的血液样本,并使用Regina Margherita儿童医院的Beckman Coulter Navios(305-1)、Candiolo癌症研究所FPO-IRCCS的Beckman Coulter FC500(305-2)、BD Biosciences FACSLyric™ S.Luigi医院(305-3)和Mauriziano医院的Beckman Coulter Navios EX(305-4)。在单平台方法中,遵循ISHAGE指南来估计CD34+细胞的百分比和绝对数量。报告了每个样品重复性限值(r)、再现性误差、再现性不确定度误差和变异系数(CV)。每个实验室或仪器的重复测量具有可变性,表示为再现性误差,低于该单个参数的重复性极限。校正后的再现性误差始终低于可重复性限值,“低”计数的百分比值除外。实验室间方差分析在最大可接受方差值范围内,每个参数的所有测量值的CV均小于8%,表明实验室间的测量变异性较低。通过评估整体数据,我们可以得出结论,这四个实验室完全一致,结果是可重复的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Inter-laboratory method validation of CD34+ flow-cytometry assay: the experience of Turin Metropolitan Transplant Centre.

Inter-laboratory method validation of CD34+ flow-cytometry assay: the experience of Turin Metropolitan Transplant Centre.

The Turin Metropolitan Transplant Centre (CIC 305) includes four flow-cytometry laboratories assessing quality control on hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) with different instruments and operators. Therefore, the CD34+ enumeration assay should be validated on a regular basis. We describe here the validation plan to test the inter-laboratory reproducibility of CD34+ enumeration assay, based on the risk analysis. Stabilized blood samples were analysed using Stem-Kit reagent according to manufacturer's instructions and acquired using the Beckman Coulter Navios at Regina Margherita Children's' Hospital (305-1), Beckman Coulter FC500 at Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS (305-2), BD Biosciences FACSLyric™ at S. Luigi Hospital (305-3), and Beckman Coulter Navios EX at Mauriziano Hospital (305-4). The ISHAGE guidelines were followed for estimating % and absolute number of CD34+ cells in single-platform method. For each sample repeatability limit (r), reproducibility error, uncertainty of reproducibility error and coefficient of variation (CV) were reported. The repeated measurements from each laboratory or instrument have a variability, expressed as reproducibility error, lower than the repeatability limit for that single parameter. The corrected reproducibility error is always lower than the repeatability limit except for the percentage value of the "low" count. The analysis of inter-laboratory variance is within the maximum acceptable variance value, and the CV of all measurements for each parameter is less than 8%, indicating low measurement variability among laboratories. Evaluating the overall data, we can conclude that the four laboratories are perfectly aligned and the results are reproducible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信