实施荷兰与欧洲指南风险因素目标对老年缺血性心脏病患者的影响。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Netherlands Heart Journal Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-23 DOI:10.1007/s12471-023-01823-x
Tinka J van Trier, Marjolein Snaterse, Ron M C Herings, Jetty A Overbeek, Ron J G Peters, Harald T Jørstad
{"title":"实施荷兰与欧洲指南风险因素目标对老年缺血性心脏病患者的影响。","authors":"Tinka J van Trier, Marjolein Snaterse, Ron M C Herings, Jetty A Overbeek, Ron J G Peters, Harald T Jørstad","doi":"10.1007/s12471-023-01823-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients with ischaemic heart disease (IHD) aged > 70 years, Dutch and European guidelines recommend different treatment targets: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) < 2.6 versus < 1.4 mmol/l and systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 140 versus < 130 mm Hg, respectively. How this impacts cardiovascular event-free life expectancy has not been investigated. The study objective was to compare estimated lifelong treatment benefits of implementing Dutch and European LDL‑c and SBP targets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from patients aged 71-80 years hospitalised for IHD in 2017-2019 were extracted from the PHARMO Database Network, which links primary and secondary healthcare settings, with follow-up until 31 December 2020. Potential benefit according to treatment strategy (in gain in event-free years) was estimated using the SMART-REACH model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3003 eligible patients, 1186 (39%) had missing LDL‑c and/or SBP measurements. Of the 1817 included patients (36% women, median age at event: 74 years (interquartile range (IQR): 72-77), 84% achieved the Dutch targets for both LDL‑c and SBP; for European targets, this was 23% and 61%, respectively. If Dutch targets were met for LDL‑c and SBP (n = 1281), the additional effect of reaching European targets was a median gain of 0.6 event-free life years (IQR: 0.3-1.0). The greatest effect could be reached in patients not reaching Dutch targets (n = 501), with a median gain of 0.6 (IQR: 0.2-1.2) and 1.7 (IQR: 1.2-2.5) event-free years with Dutch versus European targets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients aged > 70 years with IHD, implementation of European targets resulted in a greater gain of event-free years compared with Dutch targets, especially in patients with poorer risk factor control. The considerable number of patients with missing risk factor documentation suggested additional opportunities for risk reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":18952,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":"45-54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10781920/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of implementing Dutch versus European guideline risk factor targets in older patients with ischaemic heart disease.\",\"authors\":\"Tinka J van Trier, Marjolein Snaterse, Ron M C Herings, Jetty A Overbeek, Ron J G Peters, Harald T Jørstad\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12471-023-01823-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients with ischaemic heart disease (IHD) aged > 70 years, Dutch and European guidelines recommend different treatment targets: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) < 2.6 versus < 1.4 mmol/l and systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 140 versus < 130 mm Hg, respectively. How this impacts cardiovascular event-free life expectancy has not been investigated. The study objective was to compare estimated lifelong treatment benefits of implementing Dutch and European LDL‑c and SBP targets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from patients aged 71-80 years hospitalised for IHD in 2017-2019 were extracted from the PHARMO Database Network, which links primary and secondary healthcare settings, with follow-up until 31 December 2020. Potential benefit according to treatment strategy (in gain in event-free years) was estimated using the SMART-REACH model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3003 eligible patients, 1186 (39%) had missing LDL‑c and/or SBP measurements. Of the 1817 included patients (36% women, median age at event: 74 years (interquartile range (IQR): 72-77), 84% achieved the Dutch targets for both LDL‑c and SBP; for European targets, this was 23% and 61%, respectively. If Dutch targets were met for LDL‑c and SBP (n = 1281), the additional effect of reaching European targets was a median gain of 0.6 event-free life years (IQR: 0.3-1.0). The greatest effect could be reached in patients not reaching Dutch targets (n = 501), with a median gain of 0.6 (IQR: 0.2-1.2) and 1.7 (IQR: 1.2-2.5) event-free years with Dutch versus European targets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients aged > 70 years with IHD, implementation of European targets resulted in a greater gain of event-free years compared with Dutch targets, especially in patients with poorer risk factor control. The considerable number of patients with missing risk factor documentation suggested additional opportunities for risk reduction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Netherlands Heart Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"45-54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10781920/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Netherlands Heart Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-023-01823-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Netherlands Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-023-01823-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:年龄> 70年来,荷兰和欧洲指南建议不同的治疗目标:低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-c)方法:2017-2019年因IHD住院的71-80岁患者的数据取自PHARMO数据库网络,该网络连接了初级和次级医疗机构,随访至2020年12月31日。使用SMART-REACH模型估计了根据治疗策略的潜在效益(无事件年的收益)。结果:在3003名符合条件的患者中,1186名(39%)的LDL‑c和/或SBP测量值缺失。在1817名纳入患者中(36%为女性,事件发生时的中位年龄:74岁(四分位间距(IQR):72-77),84%的患者达到了LDL‑c和SBP的荷兰目标;对于欧洲的目标,这一比例分别为23%和61%。如果LDL‑c和SBP达到荷兰的目标(n = 1281),达到欧洲目标的额外效果是平均增加0.6无事件寿命年(IQR:0.3-1.0)。未达到荷兰目标的患者可能达到最大效果(n = 501),与欧洲目标相比,荷兰无事件年的中位增益分别为0.6(IQR:0.2-1.2)和1.7(IQR:1.2-2.5)。结论:年龄> IHD 70年来,与荷兰的目标相比,欧洲目标的实施带来了更大的无事件年收益,尤其是在风险因素控制较差的患者中。相当多的患者缺乏风险因素文件,这表明有更多的机会降低风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of implementing Dutch versus European guideline risk factor targets in older patients with ischaemic heart disease.

Impact of implementing Dutch versus European guideline risk factor targets in older patients with ischaemic heart disease.

Background: In patients with ischaemic heart disease (IHD) aged > 70 years, Dutch and European guidelines recommend different treatment targets: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) < 2.6 versus < 1.4 mmol/l and systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 140 versus < 130 mm Hg, respectively. How this impacts cardiovascular event-free life expectancy has not been investigated. The study objective was to compare estimated lifelong treatment benefits of implementing Dutch and European LDL‑c and SBP targets.

Methods: Data from patients aged 71-80 years hospitalised for IHD in 2017-2019 were extracted from the PHARMO Database Network, which links primary and secondary healthcare settings, with follow-up until 31 December 2020. Potential benefit according to treatment strategy (in gain in event-free years) was estimated using the SMART-REACH model.

Results: Of the 3003 eligible patients, 1186 (39%) had missing LDL‑c and/or SBP measurements. Of the 1817 included patients (36% women, median age at event: 74 years (interquartile range (IQR): 72-77), 84% achieved the Dutch targets for both LDL‑c and SBP; for European targets, this was 23% and 61%, respectively. If Dutch targets were met for LDL‑c and SBP (n = 1281), the additional effect of reaching European targets was a median gain of 0.6 event-free life years (IQR: 0.3-1.0). The greatest effect could be reached in patients not reaching Dutch targets (n = 501), with a median gain of 0.6 (IQR: 0.2-1.2) and 1.7 (IQR: 1.2-2.5) event-free years with Dutch versus European targets.

Conclusion: In patients aged > 70 years with IHD, implementation of European targets resulted in a greater gain of event-free years compared with Dutch targets, especially in patients with poorer risk factor control. The considerable number of patients with missing risk factor documentation suggested additional opportunities for risk reduction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Netherlands Heart Journal
Netherlands Heart Journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of the Netherlands Heart Journal is to contribute to the national and international literature by publishing scientific papers in the field of cardiovascular medicine. It also provides a platform for Continuing Medical Education for cardiologists and those in training for the speciality of cardiology in the Netherlands. The Netherlands Heart Journal is made available to cardiologists, cardiologists in training, cardiopulmonary surgeons, cardiopulmonary surgeons in training, internists and paediatric cardiologists. The journal is the official journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信