基于动态增强磁共振成像的综合模型比放射组学模型更能预测癌症术前组织学分级。

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy Pub Date : 2023-10-18 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/BCTT.S425996
Yitian Wu, Weixing Pan, Lingxia Wang, Wenting Pan, Huangqi Zhang, Shengze Jin, Xiuli Wu, Aie Liu, Enhui Xin, Wenbin Ji
{"title":"基于动态增强磁共振成像的综合模型比放射组学模型更能预测癌症术前组织学分级。","authors":"Yitian Wu,&nbsp;Weixing Pan,&nbsp;Lingxia Wang,&nbsp;Wenting Pan,&nbsp;Huangqi Zhang,&nbsp;Shengze Jin,&nbsp;Xiuli Wu,&nbsp;Aie Liu,&nbsp;Enhui Xin,&nbsp;Wenbin Ji","doi":"10.2147/BCTT.S425996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Histological grade is an important prognostic factor for patients with breast cancer and can affect clinical decision-making. From a clinical perspective, developing an efficient and non-invasive method for evaluating histological grading is desirable, facilitating improved clinical decision-making by physicians. This study aimed to develop an integrated model based on radiomics and clinical imaging features for preoperative prediction of histological grade invasive breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we recruited 211 patients with invasive breast cancer and randomly assigned them to either a training group (n=147) or a validation group (n=64) with a 7:3 ratio. Patients were classified as having low-grade tumors, which included grade I and II tumors, or high-grade tumors, which included grade III tumors. Three models were constructed based on basic clinical features, radiomics features, and the sum of the two. To assess diagnostic performance of the radiomics models, we employed measures such as receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, and the predictive performance of the three models was compared using the DeLong test and net reclassification improvement (NRI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The area under the curve (AUC) of the clinical model, radiomics model, and comprehensive model was 0.682, 0.833, and 0.882 in the training set and 0.741, 0.751, and 0.836 in the validation set, respectively. NRI analysis confirmed that the combined model was better than the other two models in predicting the histological grade of breast cancer (NRI=21.4% in the testing cohort).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with the other models, the comprehensive model based on the combination of basic clinical features and radiomics features exhibits more significant potential for predicting histological grade and can better assist clinicians in optimal decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":9106,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d1/13/bctt-15-709.PMC10590555.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comprehensive Model Based on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Can Better Predict the Preoperative Histological Grade of Breast Cancer Than a Radiomics Model.\",\"authors\":\"Yitian Wu,&nbsp;Weixing Pan,&nbsp;Lingxia Wang,&nbsp;Wenting Pan,&nbsp;Huangqi Zhang,&nbsp;Shengze Jin,&nbsp;Xiuli Wu,&nbsp;Aie Liu,&nbsp;Enhui Xin,&nbsp;Wenbin Ji\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/BCTT.S425996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Histological grade is an important prognostic factor for patients with breast cancer and can affect clinical decision-making. From a clinical perspective, developing an efficient and non-invasive method for evaluating histological grading is desirable, facilitating improved clinical decision-making by physicians. This study aimed to develop an integrated model based on radiomics and clinical imaging features for preoperative prediction of histological grade invasive breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we recruited 211 patients with invasive breast cancer and randomly assigned them to either a training group (n=147) or a validation group (n=64) with a 7:3 ratio. Patients were classified as having low-grade tumors, which included grade I and II tumors, or high-grade tumors, which included grade III tumors. Three models were constructed based on basic clinical features, radiomics features, and the sum of the two. To assess diagnostic performance of the radiomics models, we employed measures such as receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, and the predictive performance of the three models was compared using the DeLong test and net reclassification improvement (NRI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The area under the curve (AUC) of the clinical model, radiomics model, and comprehensive model was 0.682, 0.833, and 0.882 in the training set and 0.741, 0.751, and 0.836 in the validation set, respectively. NRI analysis confirmed that the combined model was better than the other two models in predicting the histological grade of breast cancer (NRI=21.4% in the testing cohort).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with the other models, the comprehensive model based on the combination of basic clinical features and radiomics features exhibits more significant potential for predicting histological grade and can better assist clinicians in optimal decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d1/13/bctt-15-709.PMC10590555.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S425996\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S425996","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:组织学分级是癌症患者的重要预后因素,可影响临床决策。从临床角度来看,开发一种有效且无创的方法来评估组织学分级是可取的,有助于改善医生的临床决策。本研究旨在开发一种基于放射组学和临床影像学特征的综合模型,用于术前预测组织学级别的侵袭性癌症。方法:在这项回顾性研究中,我们招募了211名癌症侵袭性患者,并以7:3的比例将他们随机分配到训练组(n=147)或验证组(n=64)。患者被分为低度肿瘤,包括I级和II级肿瘤,或高度肿瘤,包括III级肿瘤。根据基本临床特征、放射组学特征和两者的总和构建了三个模型。为了评估放射组学模型的诊断性能,我们采用了受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线、决策曲线分析(DCA)、准确性、敏感性和特异性等指标,并使用DeLong检验和净重新分类改进(NRI)对三种模型的预测性能进行了比较,放射组学模型和综合模型在训练集中分别为0.682、0.833和0.882,在验证集中分别为0.741、0.751和0.836。NRI分析证实,联合模型在预测癌症组织学分级方面优于其他两个模型(试验队列中NRI=21.4%),基于基本临床特征和放射组学特征相结合的综合模型在预测组织学分级方面表现出更大的潜力,可以更好地帮助临床医生做出最佳决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Comprehensive Model Based on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Can Better Predict the Preoperative Histological Grade of Breast Cancer Than a Radiomics Model.

A Comprehensive Model Based on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Can Better Predict the Preoperative Histological Grade of Breast Cancer Than a Radiomics Model.

A Comprehensive Model Based on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Can Better Predict the Preoperative Histological Grade of Breast Cancer Than a Radiomics Model.

A Comprehensive Model Based on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Can Better Predict the Preoperative Histological Grade of Breast Cancer Than a Radiomics Model.

Background: Histological grade is an important prognostic factor for patients with breast cancer and can affect clinical decision-making. From a clinical perspective, developing an efficient and non-invasive method for evaluating histological grading is desirable, facilitating improved clinical decision-making by physicians. This study aimed to develop an integrated model based on radiomics and clinical imaging features for preoperative prediction of histological grade invasive breast cancer.

Methods: In this retrospective study, we recruited 211 patients with invasive breast cancer and randomly assigned them to either a training group (n=147) or a validation group (n=64) with a 7:3 ratio. Patients were classified as having low-grade tumors, which included grade I and II tumors, or high-grade tumors, which included grade III tumors. Three models were constructed based on basic clinical features, radiomics features, and the sum of the two. To assess diagnostic performance of the radiomics models, we employed measures such as receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, and the predictive performance of the three models was compared using the DeLong test and net reclassification improvement (NRI).

Results: The area under the curve (AUC) of the clinical model, radiomics model, and comprehensive model was 0.682, 0.833, and 0.882 in the training set and 0.741, 0.751, and 0.836 in the validation set, respectively. NRI analysis confirmed that the combined model was better than the other two models in predicting the histological grade of breast cancer (NRI=21.4% in the testing cohort).

Conclusion: Compared with the other models, the comprehensive model based on the combination of basic clinical features and radiomics features exhibits more significant potential for predicting histological grade and can better assist clinicians in optimal decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信