虚拟现实对经直肠MRI引导前列腺活检疼痛管理的影响。

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2023-10-02 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpain.2023.1156463
Emma Perenic, Emilie Grember, Sébastien Bassard, Nicolas Koutlidis
{"title":"虚拟现实对经直肠MRI引导前列腺活检疼痛管理的影响。","authors":"Emma Perenic,&nbsp;Emilie Grember,&nbsp;Sébastien Bassard,&nbsp;Nicolas Koutlidis","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2023.1156463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The beneficial effect of virtual reality (VR) on pain management in the context of transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy is not well established. However, it remains unclear whether an adjunctive of VR also improves pain management. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of VR as adjunctive in pain management in transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy (PB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated the pain intensity incidence in the 153 patients with PB indication (of which 102 were naïve of PB) who were admitted to our hospital since the acquisition of the Healthy Mind virtual reality headset on 19 January 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics of patients who received local anesthesia with 1% lidocaine periprostatic nerve block (PPNB) (Group SOC, <i>N</i> = 78) and patients who received VR associated with PPNB (Group VR, <i>N</i> = 75) were largely similar. One PB with general anesthesia was excluded. The mean pain score at day zero was respectively 3.4 (±2.5) and 2.9 (±2.3) for SOC and VR (<i>p</i> = 0.203). However, the mean pain score at day zero was significantly lower in naïve PB patients with VR [2.7 (±2.0)] than in naïve PB patients with SOC [3.8 (±2.5), <i>p</i> = 0.012] when patients were stratified in PB status. Similar results were found on day 3 for the analysis including naïve-PB patients with SOC vs. with VR [0.4 (±2.5) vs. 0.2 (±2.0); <i>p</i> = 0.023)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pain intensity was significantly lower in naïve PB patients with VR than in naïve PB patients with SOC. There were no side effects from VR and tolerability was excellent.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10580802/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of virtual reality on pain management in transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy.\",\"authors\":\"Emma Perenic,&nbsp;Emilie Grember,&nbsp;Sébastien Bassard,&nbsp;Nicolas Koutlidis\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpain.2023.1156463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The beneficial effect of virtual reality (VR) on pain management in the context of transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy is not well established. However, it remains unclear whether an adjunctive of VR also improves pain management. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of VR as adjunctive in pain management in transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy (PB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated the pain intensity incidence in the 153 patients with PB indication (of which 102 were naïve of PB) who were admitted to our hospital since the acquisition of the Healthy Mind virtual reality headset on 19 January 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics of patients who received local anesthesia with 1% lidocaine periprostatic nerve block (PPNB) (Group SOC, <i>N</i> = 78) and patients who received VR associated with PPNB (Group VR, <i>N</i> = 75) were largely similar. One PB with general anesthesia was excluded. The mean pain score at day zero was respectively 3.4 (±2.5) and 2.9 (±2.3) for SOC and VR (<i>p</i> = 0.203). However, the mean pain score at day zero was significantly lower in naïve PB patients with VR [2.7 (±2.0)] than in naïve PB patients with SOC [3.8 (±2.5), <i>p</i> = 0.012] when patients were stratified in PB status. Similar results were found on day 3 for the analysis including naïve-PB patients with SOC vs. with VR [0.4 (±2.5) vs. 0.2 (±2.0); <i>p</i> = 0.023)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pain intensity was significantly lower in naïve PB patients with VR than in naïve PB patients with SOC. There were no side effects from VR and tolerability was excellent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10580802/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2023.1156463\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2023.1156463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在经直肠MRI引导的前列腺活检中,虚拟现实(VR)对疼痛管理的有益作用尚不明确。然而,目前尚不清楚VR的辅助作用是否也能改善疼痛管理。本研究旨在评估VR作为疼痛管理辅助手段在经直肠MRI引导的前列腺活检(PB)中的影响。方法:我们回顾性评估了自2021年1月19日购买Healthy Mind虚拟现实耳机以来,我院收治的153名有PB指征的患者(其中102人对PB一无所知)的疼痛强度发生率。结果:接受1%利多卡因前列腺周围神经阻滞(PPNB)局部麻醉的患者的基线特征(SOC组,N = 78)和接受与PPNB相关的VR的患者(VR组 = 75)基本相似。排除1例全身麻醉的PB。SOC和VR在第0天的平均疼痛评分分别为3.4(±2.5)和2.9(±2.3)(p = 0.203)。然而,患有VR的幼稚PB患者在第0天的平均疼痛评分[2.7(±2.0)]显著低于患有SOC的幼稚PB患者[3.8(±2.5),p = 0.012],当患者按PB状态分层时。在第3天的分析中发现了类似的结果,包括SOC与VR的幼稚PB患者[0.4(±2.5)vs.0.2(±2.0);p = 0.023)]。结论:VR患者的疼痛强度明显低于SOC患者。VR无副作用,耐受性良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of virtual reality on pain management in transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy.

Impact of virtual reality on pain management in transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy.

Background: The beneficial effect of virtual reality (VR) on pain management in the context of transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy is not well established. However, it remains unclear whether an adjunctive of VR also improves pain management. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of VR as adjunctive in pain management in transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy (PB).

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the pain intensity incidence in the 153 patients with PB indication (of which 102 were naïve of PB) who were admitted to our hospital since the acquisition of the Healthy Mind virtual reality headset on 19 January 2021.

Results: Baseline characteristics of patients who received local anesthesia with 1% lidocaine periprostatic nerve block (PPNB) (Group SOC, N = 78) and patients who received VR associated with PPNB (Group VR, N = 75) were largely similar. One PB with general anesthesia was excluded. The mean pain score at day zero was respectively 3.4 (±2.5) and 2.9 (±2.3) for SOC and VR (p = 0.203). However, the mean pain score at day zero was significantly lower in naïve PB patients with VR [2.7 (±2.0)] than in naïve PB patients with SOC [3.8 (±2.5), p = 0.012] when patients were stratified in PB status. Similar results were found on day 3 for the analysis including naïve-PB patients with SOC vs. with VR [0.4 (±2.5) vs. 0.2 (±2.0); p = 0.023)].

Conclusions: The pain intensity was significantly lower in naïve PB patients with VR than in naïve PB patients with SOC. There were no side effects from VR and tolerability was excellent.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信