黄连素治疗室性早搏的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析和随机对照试验的系统综述。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-19 DOI:10.1080/13880209.2023.2248167
Meng Qiao, Chao Lei, Chaoren Tan, Cuncun Lu, Zijia Chen, Qiang Zhang, Zhifei Wang
{"title":"黄连素治疗室性早搏的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析和随机对照试验的系统综述。","authors":"Meng Qiao,&nbsp;Chao Lei,&nbsp;Chaoren Tan,&nbsp;Cuncun Lu,&nbsp;Zijia Chen,&nbsp;Qiang Zhang,&nbsp;Zhifei Wang","doi":"10.1080/13880209.2023.2248167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Berberine is a potential drug that can effectively treat cardiovascular diseases, including premature ventricular contractions (PVCs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of berberine for PVCs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The literature was searched using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), Wanfang, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to October 1, 2022. The risk of bias was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to assess the quality of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten RCTs with 896 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that compared to antiarrhythmic drugs (AD), berberine (BE) combined with AD had a higher effective rate (RR = 1.26; 95% CI:1.12, 1.42; <i>p</i> = 0.0001) with no significant incidence of adverse reactions (RR = 0.93; 95% CI:0.33, 2.57; <i>p</i> = 0.88), and BE alone had no significant difference in effective rate (RR = 0.91; 95% CI:0.77, 1.07; <i>p</i> = 0.23), and a lower incidence of adverse reactions (RR = 0.38; 95% CI:0.15, 0.97; <i>p</i> = 0.04) and recurrence rate (RR = 0.40; 95% CI:0.18, 0.88; <i>p</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that BE is an effective and safe adjunctive method for PVCs. In addition, BE is recommended for patients with PVCs who had severe adverse reactions after administrating AD as an alternative therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588516/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of berberine for premature ventricular contractions: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Meng Qiao,&nbsp;Chao Lei,&nbsp;Chaoren Tan,&nbsp;Cuncun Lu,&nbsp;Zijia Chen,&nbsp;Qiang Zhang,&nbsp;Zhifei Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13880209.2023.2248167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Berberine is a potential drug that can effectively treat cardiovascular diseases, including premature ventricular contractions (PVCs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of berberine for PVCs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The literature was searched using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), Wanfang, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to October 1, 2022. The risk of bias was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to assess the quality of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten RCTs with 896 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that compared to antiarrhythmic drugs (AD), berberine (BE) combined with AD had a higher effective rate (RR = 1.26; 95% CI:1.12, 1.42; <i>p</i> = 0.0001) with no significant incidence of adverse reactions (RR = 0.93; 95% CI:0.33, 2.57; <i>p</i> = 0.88), and BE alone had no significant difference in effective rate (RR = 0.91; 95% CI:0.77, 1.07; <i>p</i> = 0.23), and a lower incidence of adverse reactions (RR = 0.38; 95% CI:0.15, 0.97; <i>p</i> = 0.04) and recurrence rate (RR = 0.40; 95% CI:0.18, 0.88; <i>p</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that BE is an effective and safe adjunctive method for PVCs. In addition, BE is recommended for patients with PVCs who had severe adverse reactions after administrating AD as an alternative therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588516/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13880209.2023.2248167\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13880209.2023.2248167","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:黄连素是一种潜在的药物,可有效治疗心血管疾病,包括室性早搏。目的:评价黄连素治疗室性早缩的疗效和安全性。方法:利用PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase、中国知网检索文献,中国科学技术期刊数据库(VIP)、万方和中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM),用于从开始到2022年10月1日的随机对照试验。使用随机试验的修订版Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险,并采用建议评估、发展和评估分级(GRADE)系统来评估证据质量。结果:荟萃分析包括10项随机对照试验,共896名参与者。结果表明,与抗心律失常药物(AD)相比,黄连素(BE)联合AD有效率较高(RR=1.26;95%CI:1.12,1.42;p = 0.0001),无明显不良反应发生率(RR=0.93;95%CI:0.33,2.57;p = 0.88),单独BE的有效率无显著差异(RR=0.91;95%CI:0.77,1.07;p = 0.23),不良反应发生率较低(RR=0.38;95%CI:0.15,0.97;p = 0.04)和复发率(RR=0.40;95%CI:0.18,0.88;p = 0.02)。结论:BE是一种有效、安全的PVC辅助治疗方法。此外,BE被推荐用于在给予AD作为替代治疗后出现严重不良反应的PVC患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficacy and safety of berberine for premature ventricular contractions: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Efficacy and safety of berberine for premature ventricular contractions: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Efficacy and safety of berberine for premature ventricular contractions: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Efficacy and safety of berberine for premature ventricular contractions: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Context: Berberine is a potential drug that can effectively treat cardiovascular diseases, including premature ventricular contractions (PVCs).

Objective: This study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of berberine for PVCs.

Methods: The literature was searched using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), Wanfang, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to October 1, 2022. The risk of bias was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to assess the quality of evidence.

Results: Ten RCTs with 896 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that compared to antiarrhythmic drugs (AD), berberine (BE) combined with AD had a higher effective rate (RR = 1.26; 95% CI:1.12, 1.42; p = 0.0001) with no significant incidence of adverse reactions (RR = 0.93; 95% CI:0.33, 2.57; p = 0.88), and BE alone had no significant difference in effective rate (RR = 0.91; 95% CI:0.77, 1.07; p = 0.23), and a lower incidence of adverse reactions (RR = 0.38; 95% CI:0.15, 0.97; p = 0.04) and recurrence rate (RR = 0.40; 95% CI:0.18, 0.88; p = 0.02).

Conclusions: The results suggest that BE is an effective and safe adjunctive method for PVCs. In addition, BE is recommended for patients with PVCs who had severe adverse reactions after administrating AD as an alternative therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信