脑转移瘤放射外科和免疫疗法的结合:疗效和毒性之间的平衡。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Current Opinion in Neurology Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-04 DOI:10.1097/WCO.0000000000001217
Angela Botticella, Frederic Dhermain
{"title":"脑转移瘤放射外科和免疫疗法的结合:疗效和毒性之间的平衡。","authors":"Angela Botticella, Frederic Dhermain","doi":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The incidence of brain metastasis is high and still increasing. Among local therapies, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective treatment option, optimally sparing normal brain, even for multiple brain metastases. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) become the new standard of care in an increasing number of cancers, and the combination SRS and ICI is often proposed to patients, but few data have been published on the efficacy and the toxicity of this association.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Explaining this lack of consensus: retrospective studies with different primary cancers, various treatment lines and unknown levels of steroid exposure. Concerning the toxicity, the independent association of radionecrosis with brain-PTV volume was confirmed, and a decreased dose of SRS is now tested in a randomized study. Finally, a 'concurrent' delivery of SRS and ICI (within a 4 weeks' interval) seems the optimal schedule; fractionated radiosurgery for large brain metastasis should be favored. Radio-sensitizing nanoparticles and devices aiming to increase the permeability of the blood brain barrier should be considered in future combinations.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The efficacy/toxicity balance of SRS-ICI combination should be regularly re-evaluated, anticipating continued progress in ICI and SRS delivery, with more long-survivors potentially exposed to long-term toxicities. Patients should be included in clinical trials and clearly informed to participate more closely in the final choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11059,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combination of radiosurgery and immunotherapy in brain metastases: balance between efficacy and toxicities.\",\"authors\":\"Angela Botticella, Frederic Dhermain\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The incidence of brain metastasis is high and still increasing. Among local therapies, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective treatment option, optimally sparing normal brain, even for multiple brain metastases. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) become the new standard of care in an increasing number of cancers, and the combination SRS and ICI is often proposed to patients, but few data have been published on the efficacy and the toxicity of this association.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Explaining this lack of consensus: retrospective studies with different primary cancers, various treatment lines and unknown levels of steroid exposure. Concerning the toxicity, the independent association of radionecrosis with brain-PTV volume was confirmed, and a decreased dose of SRS is now tested in a randomized study. Finally, a 'concurrent' delivery of SRS and ICI (within a 4 weeks' interval) seems the optimal schedule; fractionated radiosurgery for large brain metastasis should be favored. Radio-sensitizing nanoparticles and devices aiming to increase the permeability of the blood brain barrier should be considered in future combinations.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The efficacy/toxicity balance of SRS-ICI combination should be regularly re-evaluated, anticipating continued progress in ICI and SRS delivery, with more long-survivors potentially exposed to long-term toxicities. Patients should be included in clinical trials and clearly informed to participate more closely in the final choice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000001217\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000001217","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:脑转移的发生率很高,而且仍在增加。在局部治疗中,立体定向放射外科(SRS)是一种有效的治疗选择,即使是多发性脑转移,也能最佳地保护正常大脑。免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)已成为越来越多癌症的新护理标准,SRS和ICI的组合经常被推荐给患者,但关于这种关联的疗效和毒性的数据很少发表。最近的发现:解释这种缺乏共识的原因:对不同原发性癌症、不同治疗线和未知类固醇暴露水平的回顾性研究。关于毒性,放射性坏死与脑PTV容量的独立相关性已得到证实,SRS剂量的降低目前正在一项随机研究中进行测试。最后,SRS和ICI的“同时”交付(在4 周间隔)似乎是最佳时间表;对于大的脑转移瘤,应优先采用分次放射外科治疗。在未来的组合中,应考虑使用放射性增敏纳米颗粒和旨在提高血脑屏障通透性的设备。总结:应定期重新评估SRS-ICI联合用药的疗效/毒性平衡,预计ICI和SRS给药将继续取得进展,更多长期存活者可能暴露于长期毒性。应将患者纳入临床试验,并明确告知其更密切地参与最终选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combination of radiosurgery and immunotherapy in brain metastases: balance between efficacy and toxicities.

Purpose of review: The incidence of brain metastasis is high and still increasing. Among local therapies, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective treatment option, optimally sparing normal brain, even for multiple brain metastases. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) become the new standard of care in an increasing number of cancers, and the combination SRS and ICI is often proposed to patients, but few data have been published on the efficacy and the toxicity of this association.

Recent findings: Explaining this lack of consensus: retrospective studies with different primary cancers, various treatment lines and unknown levels of steroid exposure. Concerning the toxicity, the independent association of radionecrosis with brain-PTV volume was confirmed, and a decreased dose of SRS is now tested in a randomized study. Finally, a 'concurrent' delivery of SRS and ICI (within a 4 weeks' interval) seems the optimal schedule; fractionated radiosurgery for large brain metastasis should be favored. Radio-sensitizing nanoparticles and devices aiming to increase the permeability of the blood brain barrier should be considered in future combinations.

Summary: The efficacy/toxicity balance of SRS-ICI combination should be regularly re-evaluated, anticipating continued progress in ICI and SRS delivery, with more long-survivors potentially exposed to long-term toxicities. Patients should be included in clinical trials and clearly informed to participate more closely in the final choice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Neurology
Current Opinion in Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Neurology is a highly regarded journal offering insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews; covering key subjects such as cerebrovascular disease, developmental disorders, neuroimaging and demyelinating diseases. Published bimonthly, each issue of Current Opinion in Neurology introduces world renowned guest editors and internationally recognized academics within the neurology field, delivering a widespread selection of expert assessments on the latest developments from the most recent literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信