利用项目反应理论研究囤积症状中潜在的性别偏见

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
K.R. Timpano , Z.T. Goodman , M.L. Kushner , S.E. Hudiburgh , C.I. Rodriguez , J.R. Grisham
{"title":"利用项目反应理论研究囤积症状中潜在的性别偏见","authors":"K.R. Timpano ,&nbsp;Z.T. Goodman ,&nbsp;M.L. Kushner ,&nbsp;S.E. Hudiburgh ,&nbsp;C.I. Rodriguez ,&nbsp;J.R. Grisham","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2023.100788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Gender and/or sex differences<span> in the prevalence of hoarding disorder have been well documented, yet there remains a striking lack of understanding as to potential reasons. Critically no study to date has examined whether gender differences may stem from underlying biases in hoarding assessment instruments. The current study used item response theory to evaluate the Saving Inventory-Revised (SI-R; Frost et al., 1994), to determine if there might be differential item functioning (DIF) between men and women across the three core features of hoarding. We first examined responses in a sample of individuals with clinically significant hoarding symptoms (N = 255), and then replicated our findings in a non-selected community sample (N = 719). There was evidence of modest DIF, which affected only a handful of items in each SI-R subscale. In the clinical sample, women scored significantly higher on the clutter and acquisition latent continuum, whereas there was no </span></span>gender difference for difficulties discarding. In contrast, there were no gender differences in any of the subscales for the community sample. Findings indicate that while there are likely gender differences in the manifestation and associated features of hoarding, those gender differences are not the result of measurement artifacts in the SI-R.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using item response theory to investigate potential gender bias in hoarding symptoms\",\"authors\":\"K.R. Timpano ,&nbsp;Z.T. Goodman ,&nbsp;M.L. Kushner ,&nbsp;S.E. Hudiburgh ,&nbsp;C.I. Rodriguez ,&nbsp;J.R. Grisham\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocrd.2023.100788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Gender and/or sex differences<span> in the prevalence of hoarding disorder have been well documented, yet there remains a striking lack of understanding as to potential reasons. Critically no study to date has examined whether gender differences may stem from underlying biases in hoarding assessment instruments. The current study used item response theory to evaluate the Saving Inventory-Revised (SI-R; Frost et al., 1994), to determine if there might be differential item functioning (DIF) between men and women across the three core features of hoarding. We first examined responses in a sample of individuals with clinically significant hoarding symptoms (N = 255), and then replicated our findings in a non-selected community sample (N = 719). There was evidence of modest DIF, which affected only a handful of items in each SI-R subscale. In the clinical sample, women scored significantly higher on the clutter and acquisition latent continuum, whereas there was no </span></span>gender difference for difficulties discarding. In contrast, there were no gender differences in any of the subscales for the community sample. Findings indicate that while there are likely gender differences in the manifestation and associated features of hoarding, those gender differences are not the result of measurement artifacts in the SI-R.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221136492300009X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221136492300009X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

囤积症患病率的性别和/或性别差异已得到充分记录,但对潜在原因仍缺乏了解。至关重要的是,到目前为止,还没有研究表明性别差异是否源于囤积评估工具的潜在偏见。目前的研究使用物品反应理论来评估修订的节约清单(SI-R;Frost等人,1994),以确定男性和女性在囤积的三个核心特征中是否存在差异性物品功能(DIF)。我们首先检查了具有临床显著囤积症状的个体样本(N=255)的反应,然后在未选择的社区样本(N=719)中复制了我们的发现。有证据表明DIF适度,这只影响每个SI-R分量表中的少数项目。在临床样本中,女性在杂乱和获得潜在连续体上的得分显著较高,而在丢弃困难方面没有性别差异。相反,在社区样本的任何分量表中都没有性别差异。研究结果表明,虽然囤积的表现和相关特征可能存在性别差异,但这些性别差异并不是SI-R中测量假象的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using item response theory to investigate potential gender bias in hoarding symptoms

Gender and/or sex differences in the prevalence of hoarding disorder have been well documented, yet there remains a striking lack of understanding as to potential reasons. Critically no study to date has examined whether gender differences may stem from underlying biases in hoarding assessment instruments. The current study used item response theory to evaluate the Saving Inventory-Revised (SI-R; Frost et al., 1994), to determine if there might be differential item functioning (DIF) between men and women across the three core features of hoarding. We first examined responses in a sample of individuals with clinically significant hoarding symptoms (N = 255), and then replicated our findings in a non-selected community sample (N = 719). There was evidence of modest DIF, which affected only a handful of items in each SI-R subscale. In the clinical sample, women scored significantly higher on the clutter and acquisition latent continuum, whereas there was no gender difference for difficulties discarding. In contrast, there were no gender differences in any of the subscales for the community sample. Findings indicate that while there are likely gender differences in the manifestation and associated features of hoarding, those gender differences are not the result of measurement artifacts in the SI-R.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信