从合法化编码理论看我国土木工程英语MOOC教师话语的专业化与语义解读

Feng Dai, Chengyu Liu
{"title":"从合法化编码理论看我国土木工程英语MOOC教师话语的专业化与语义解读","authors":"Feng Dai, Chengyu Liu","doi":"10.33394/jollt.v11i3.7974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the economic development of China, the need for Civil Engineering talents with English language skills is continuously increasing. To meet this need, Civil Engineering English teaching plays a significant role. This paper takes the Civil Engineering English MOOC provided by a university located in eastern China, as an example, and takes two dimensions of the Legitimation Code Theory, specialization and semantics to investigate the following research questions: (RQ1) What are the textual semantic features, specialization and semantics characteristics of the selected Civil Engineering textbook? (RQ2) What “unpacking” strategies does the teacher adopt in the teaching process and what are the textual semantic features, specialization, and semantics characteristics of teacher talk in the MOOC? (RQ3) From the perspective of specialization and semantics dimensions, are there any deficiencies in this MOOC? The purpose is to analyze the “unpacking” strategies in teacher talk and the possible problems in the teaching process. The content analysis method is employed, and the data include two aspects: one is the textbook the MOOC adopted; the other is the teacher talk. Through the analysis, we draw the following conclusions: the teaching material shows the characteristics of high lexical difficulty and high semantic density; in the teaching process, the teacher, who works as an “intermediary”, mainly adopts “unpacking” strategies such as transforming knowledge code into knower code, improving learners’ knowledge code, and reducing semantic density. However, some defects such as the lack of knower code in teaching content, semantic wave fracture, and the weak comprehensibility of the input content make it difficult to achieve the teaching goal of mastering the elite code. Given these defects, this paper tentatively puts forward some suggestions based on the adopted theory.","PeriodicalId":33956,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Languages and Language Teaching","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Specialization and Semantics Interpretation of Teacher Talk of Civil Engineering English MOOC In China: The Legitimation Code Theory Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Feng Dai, Chengyu Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.33394/jollt.v11i3.7974\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the economic development of China, the need for Civil Engineering talents with English language skills is continuously increasing. To meet this need, Civil Engineering English teaching plays a significant role. This paper takes the Civil Engineering English MOOC provided by a university located in eastern China, as an example, and takes two dimensions of the Legitimation Code Theory, specialization and semantics to investigate the following research questions: (RQ1) What are the textual semantic features, specialization and semantics characteristics of the selected Civil Engineering textbook? (RQ2) What “unpacking” strategies does the teacher adopt in the teaching process and what are the textual semantic features, specialization, and semantics characteristics of teacher talk in the MOOC? (RQ3) From the perspective of specialization and semantics dimensions, are there any deficiencies in this MOOC? The purpose is to analyze the “unpacking” strategies in teacher talk and the possible problems in the teaching process. The content analysis method is employed, and the data include two aspects: one is the textbook the MOOC adopted; the other is the teacher talk. Through the analysis, we draw the following conclusions: the teaching material shows the characteristics of high lexical difficulty and high semantic density; in the teaching process, the teacher, who works as an “intermediary”, mainly adopts “unpacking” strategies such as transforming knowledge code into knower code, improving learners’ knowledge code, and reducing semantic density. However, some defects such as the lack of knower code in teaching content, semantic wave fracture, and the weak comprehensibility of the input content make it difficult to achieve the teaching goal of mastering the elite code. Given these defects, this paper tentatively puts forward some suggestions based on the adopted theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Languages and Language Teaching\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Languages and Language Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i3.7974\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Languages and Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i3.7974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着中国经济的发展,对具有英语语言能力的土木工程人才的需求不断增加。为了满足这一需求,土木工程英语教学发挥着重要作用。本文以中国东部某高校土木工程英语慕课为例,从合法化编码理论、专业化和语义两个维度考察了以下研究问题:(RQ1)所选土木工程教材的语篇语义特征、专业化与语义特征是什么?(RQ2)教师在教学过程中采取了哪些“解包”策略,MOOC中教师话语的语篇语义特征、专业化和语义特征是什么?(RQ3)从专业化和语义维度来看,本次慕课是否存在不足?目的是分析教师谈话中的“拆包”策略以及在教学过程中可能出现的问题。采用内容分析法,数据包括两个方面:一是MOOC采用的教材;二是教师谈话。通过分析,我们得出以下结论:教材具有词汇难度高、语义密度大的特点;在教学过程中,教师作为中介,主要采取将知识代码转化为知者代码、提高学习者知识代码、降低语义密度等解包策略。然而,由于教学内容缺乏知者代码、语义波折、输入内容理解能力弱等缺陷,难以实现掌握精英代码的教学目标。鉴于这些缺陷,本文在所采用的理论基础上,初步提出了一些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Specialization and Semantics Interpretation of Teacher Talk of Civil Engineering English MOOC In China: The Legitimation Code Theory Perspective
With the economic development of China, the need for Civil Engineering talents with English language skills is continuously increasing. To meet this need, Civil Engineering English teaching plays a significant role. This paper takes the Civil Engineering English MOOC provided by a university located in eastern China, as an example, and takes two dimensions of the Legitimation Code Theory, specialization and semantics to investigate the following research questions: (RQ1) What are the textual semantic features, specialization and semantics characteristics of the selected Civil Engineering textbook? (RQ2) What “unpacking” strategies does the teacher adopt in the teaching process and what are the textual semantic features, specialization, and semantics characteristics of teacher talk in the MOOC? (RQ3) From the perspective of specialization and semantics dimensions, are there any deficiencies in this MOOC? The purpose is to analyze the “unpacking” strategies in teacher talk and the possible problems in the teaching process. The content analysis method is employed, and the data include two aspects: one is the textbook the MOOC adopted; the other is the teacher talk. Through the analysis, we draw the following conclusions: the teaching material shows the characteristics of high lexical difficulty and high semantic density; in the teaching process, the teacher, who works as an “intermediary”, mainly adopts “unpacking” strategies such as transforming knowledge code into knower code, improving learners’ knowledge code, and reducing semantic density. However, some defects such as the lack of knower code in teaching content, semantic wave fracture, and the weak comprehensibility of the input content make it difficult to achieve the teaching goal of mastering the elite code. Given these defects, this paper tentatively puts forward some suggestions based on the adopted theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信