老年人比我们想象的更不平等吗?与行政记录相关的收入和项目参与调查估算

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY
Daniel K. Thompson , Christopher R. Tamborini
{"title":"老年人比我们想象的更不平等吗?与行政记录相关的收入和项目参与调查估算","authors":"Daniel K. Thompson ,&nbsp;Christopher R. Tamborini","doi":"10.1016/j.rssm.2023.100825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite increased scholarly and policy interest in income inequality<span>, our knowledge of inequality in later life is relatively limited. One challenge to studying inequality in older age groups is that income sources that are important in later life, including pensions and retirement accounts, may be poorly captured by household income surveys. In this study, we investigate income inequality among the older population in the United States, focusing on how measurement error affects retirement income estimates and its impact on summary measures of inequality. We use a rich dataset that links respondents in the Survey of Income and Program Participation with restricted-use administrative records from the Social Security Administration and Internal Revenue Service. We find systematic, nonclassical measurement error in survey-reported retirement income, particularly from pensions and retirement accounts. Due to these patterns of measurement error, income inequality estimates are considerably higher using administrative records instead of survey-reported data. Additional analyses show the effects of measurement error when estimating between- and within-group inequality across racial-ethnic and education groups. The downward bias associated with measuring income inequality among older Americans could worsen in the future given the shift from defined-benefit to defined-contribution retirement plans.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":47384,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 100825"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is older age more unequal than we think? Estimates from the Survey of Income and Program Participation linked to administrative records\",\"authors\":\"Daniel K. Thompson ,&nbsp;Christopher R. Tamborini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rssm.2023.100825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite increased scholarly and policy interest in income inequality<span>, our knowledge of inequality in later life is relatively limited. One challenge to studying inequality in older age groups is that income sources that are important in later life, including pensions and retirement accounts, may be poorly captured by household income surveys. In this study, we investigate income inequality among the older population in the United States, focusing on how measurement error affects retirement income estimates and its impact on summary measures of inequality. We use a rich dataset that links respondents in the Survey of Income and Program Participation with restricted-use administrative records from the Social Security Administration and Internal Revenue Service. We find systematic, nonclassical measurement error in survey-reported retirement income, particularly from pensions and retirement accounts. Due to these patterns of measurement error, income inequality estimates are considerably higher using administrative records instead of survey-reported data. Additional analyses show the effects of measurement error when estimating between- and within-group inequality across racial-ethnic and education groups. The downward bias associated with measuring income inequality among older Americans could worsen in the future given the shift from defined-benefit to defined-contribution retirement plans.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility\",\"volume\":\"87 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100825\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0276562423000690\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0276562423000690","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管学术界和政策制定者对收入不平等的兴趣越来越大,但我们对晚年不平等的认识相对有限。研究老年群体不平等的一个挑战是,家庭收入调查可能没有很好地捕捉到对晚年生活很重要的收入来源,包括养老金和退休账户。在本研究中,我们调查了美国老年人口的收入不平等,重点关注测量误差如何影响退休收入估计及其对不平等的汇总测量的影响。我们使用了一个丰富的数据集,将收入和计划参与调查的受访者与社会保障局和国税局的限制使用的行政记录联系起来。我们在调查报告的退休收入中发现了系统性的、非经典的测量误差,尤其是养老金和退休账户。由于这些测量误差的模式,使用行政记录而不是调查报告的数据来估计收入不平等要高得多。另外的分析表明,在估计跨种族、民族和教育群体的群体之间和群体内部不平等时,测量误差会产生影响。考虑到退休计划从固定收益制向固定缴款制的转变,与衡量美国老年人收入不平等相关的向下偏差未来可能会恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is older age more unequal than we think? Estimates from the Survey of Income and Program Participation linked to administrative records

Despite increased scholarly and policy interest in income inequality, our knowledge of inequality in later life is relatively limited. One challenge to studying inequality in older age groups is that income sources that are important in later life, including pensions and retirement accounts, may be poorly captured by household income surveys. In this study, we investigate income inequality among the older population in the United States, focusing on how measurement error affects retirement income estimates and its impact on summary measures of inequality. We use a rich dataset that links respondents in the Survey of Income and Program Participation with restricted-use administrative records from the Social Security Administration and Internal Revenue Service. We find systematic, nonclassical measurement error in survey-reported retirement income, particularly from pensions and retirement accounts. Due to these patterns of measurement error, income inequality estimates are considerably higher using administrative records instead of survey-reported data. Additional analyses show the effects of measurement error when estimating between- and within-group inequality across racial-ethnic and education groups. The downward bias associated with measuring income inequality among older Americans could worsen in the future given the shift from defined-benefit to defined-contribution retirement plans.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The study of social inequality is and has been one of the central preoccupations of social scientists. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility is dedicated to publishing the highest, most innovative research on issues of social inequality from a broad diversity of theoretical and methodological perspectives. The journal is also dedicated to cutting edge summaries of prior research and fruitful exchanges that will stimulate future research on issues of social inequality. The study of social inequality is and has been one of the central preoccupations of social scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信