超越发生:行为艺术与传播政治

IF 0.3 2区 艺术学 0 THEATER
Micaela G. Signorelli
{"title":"超越发生:行为艺术与传播政治","authors":"Micaela G. Signorelli","doi":"10.1080/10486801.2022.2009661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"home turf. This generative bent makes the book well-suited to inclusion on syllabi for graduate methods courses or project-based advanced undergraduate courses. Outside the classroom, Theater as Data will be valuable to data-oriented theatre, dance, and performance studies research projects of any complexity, from a simple Zotero database of Victorian newspaper clippings that will inform a solo-authored monograph to a million-point network analysis visualization destined for a crossinstitutional NEH grant. Importantly, while the book is informative for research that prioritizes data, it does not speak to the full spectrum of digital humanities (DH) work that is possible and ongoing in theatre, dance, and performance studies. Happily, Varela points out that he uses ‘computational’ rather than ‘digital’ (14) precisely to avoid giving this impression. In so doing, Theater as Data sidesteps a mistake too often made by quantitative work that fails to understand the many instances of qualitative and interpretive DH research that exist across the fields. Another important note the book strikes is advocacy for more scholars to become familiar with programming: ‘The more we increase our programming proficiency, the more resilient we will be as a community that does not need to outsource decision-making to other disciplines and to commercial companies’ (181). While this shift would be beneficial, it is also important to acknowledge that, even with simple tools, the time exigencies of technological upskilling can be incompatible with the demands of career and personal life for many scholars. And it bears noting that DH projects cannot escape the infamous iron triangle of design, wherein any project can pick two from the list of ‘fast, good, and cheap’. Spending one token on the ‘cheap’ of a do-it-yourself approach leaves a choice between a protracted completion date or subpar quality. Hiring and managing coders to build a project ‘fast and good’ does not have to mean handing over decision-making along with the grunt work. This observation is less critique than it is agreement that we should find more ways to lower the barriers to participation for humanists and increase the number and quality of projects in this vital new realm. By providing the methodological cornerstone the field has needed to begin such an endeavor, Theater as Data is likely to become the definitive guide to using computational data in theatre, dance, and performance studies research. © E.B. Bradley Hunter https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10486801.2022.2009660","PeriodicalId":43835,"journal":{"name":"CONTEMPORARY THEATRE REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the Happening: Performance Art and the Politics of Communication\",\"authors\":\"Micaela G. Signorelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10486801.2022.2009661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"home turf. This generative bent makes the book well-suited to inclusion on syllabi for graduate methods courses or project-based advanced undergraduate courses. Outside the classroom, Theater as Data will be valuable to data-oriented theatre, dance, and performance studies research projects of any complexity, from a simple Zotero database of Victorian newspaper clippings that will inform a solo-authored monograph to a million-point network analysis visualization destined for a crossinstitutional NEH grant. Importantly, while the book is informative for research that prioritizes data, it does not speak to the full spectrum of digital humanities (DH) work that is possible and ongoing in theatre, dance, and performance studies. Happily, Varela points out that he uses ‘computational’ rather than ‘digital’ (14) precisely to avoid giving this impression. In so doing, Theater as Data sidesteps a mistake too often made by quantitative work that fails to understand the many instances of qualitative and interpretive DH research that exist across the fields. Another important note the book strikes is advocacy for more scholars to become familiar with programming: ‘The more we increase our programming proficiency, the more resilient we will be as a community that does not need to outsource decision-making to other disciplines and to commercial companies’ (181). While this shift would be beneficial, it is also important to acknowledge that, even with simple tools, the time exigencies of technological upskilling can be incompatible with the demands of career and personal life for many scholars. And it bears noting that DH projects cannot escape the infamous iron triangle of design, wherein any project can pick two from the list of ‘fast, good, and cheap’. Spending one token on the ‘cheap’ of a do-it-yourself approach leaves a choice between a protracted completion date or subpar quality. Hiring and managing coders to build a project ‘fast and good’ does not have to mean handing over decision-making along with the grunt work. This observation is less critique than it is agreement that we should find more ways to lower the barriers to participation for humanists and increase the number and quality of projects in this vital new realm. By providing the methodological cornerstone the field has needed to begin such an endeavor, Theater as Data is likely to become the definitive guide to using computational data in theatre, dance, and performance studies research. © E.B. Bradley Hunter https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10486801.2022.2009660\",\"PeriodicalId\":43835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CONTEMPORARY THEATRE REVIEW\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CONTEMPORARY THEATRE REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10486801.2022.2009661\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CONTEMPORARY THEATRE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10486801.2022.2009661","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主场。这种生成倾向使这本书非常适合列入研究生方法课程或基于项目的高级本科生课程的教学大纲。在课堂之外,Theater as Data将对任何复杂的以数据为导向的戏剧、舞蹈和表演研究项目都很有价值,从一个简单的维多利亚剪报Zotero数据库,到一本个人撰写的专著,再到一个用于跨机构NEH拨款的百万点网络分析可视化。重要的是,虽然这本书为优先考虑数据的研究提供了信息,但它并没有涉及戏剧、舞蹈和表演研究中可能和正在进行的全方位数字人文(DH)工作。令人高兴的是,瓦雷拉指出,他使用“计算”而不是“数字”(14)正是为了避免给人留下这种印象。在这样做的过程中,Theater as Data回避了定量工作经常犯的一个错误,即无法理解跨领域存在的许多定性和解释性DH研究实例。这本书的另一个重要亮点是倡导更多学者熟悉编程:“我们的编程熟练程度越高,我们作为一个不需要将决策外包给其他学科和商业公司的社区就越有弹性”(181)。虽然这种转变是有益的,但也必须承认,即使使用简单的工具,技术提升的时间紧迫性也可能与许多学者的职业和个人生活需求不兼容。值得注意的是,DH项目无法逃脱臭名昭著的铁三角设计,任何项目都可以从“快、好、便宜”的列表中选择两个。在自己动手的“廉价”方法上花费一个代币,就可以在漫长的完成日期和低劣的质量之间做出选择。雇佣和管理编码人员来“快速而好”地构建一个项目并不一定意味着在繁重的工作中交出决策权。这一观察与其说是批评,不如说是一致认为,我们应该找到更多的方法来降低人文主义者的参与障碍,并在这个至关重要的新领域增加项目的数量和质量。通过提供该领域开始这项工作所需的方法学基石,Theater as Data很可能成为在戏剧、舞蹈和表演研究中使用计算数据的最终指南。©E.B.Bradley Hunterhttps://doi.org/10.1080/10486801.2022.2009660
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond the Happening: Performance Art and the Politics of Communication
home turf. This generative bent makes the book well-suited to inclusion on syllabi for graduate methods courses or project-based advanced undergraduate courses. Outside the classroom, Theater as Data will be valuable to data-oriented theatre, dance, and performance studies research projects of any complexity, from a simple Zotero database of Victorian newspaper clippings that will inform a solo-authored monograph to a million-point network analysis visualization destined for a crossinstitutional NEH grant. Importantly, while the book is informative for research that prioritizes data, it does not speak to the full spectrum of digital humanities (DH) work that is possible and ongoing in theatre, dance, and performance studies. Happily, Varela points out that he uses ‘computational’ rather than ‘digital’ (14) precisely to avoid giving this impression. In so doing, Theater as Data sidesteps a mistake too often made by quantitative work that fails to understand the many instances of qualitative and interpretive DH research that exist across the fields. Another important note the book strikes is advocacy for more scholars to become familiar with programming: ‘The more we increase our programming proficiency, the more resilient we will be as a community that does not need to outsource decision-making to other disciplines and to commercial companies’ (181). While this shift would be beneficial, it is also important to acknowledge that, even with simple tools, the time exigencies of technological upskilling can be incompatible with the demands of career and personal life for many scholars. And it bears noting that DH projects cannot escape the infamous iron triangle of design, wherein any project can pick two from the list of ‘fast, good, and cheap’. Spending one token on the ‘cheap’ of a do-it-yourself approach leaves a choice between a protracted completion date or subpar quality. Hiring and managing coders to build a project ‘fast and good’ does not have to mean handing over decision-making along with the grunt work. This observation is less critique than it is agreement that we should find more ways to lower the barriers to participation for humanists and increase the number and quality of projects in this vital new realm. By providing the methodological cornerstone the field has needed to begin such an endeavor, Theater as Data is likely to become the definitive guide to using computational data in theatre, dance, and performance studies research. © E.B. Bradley Hunter https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10486801.2022.2009660
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Contemporary Theatre Review (CTR) analyses what is most passionate and vital in theatre today. It encompasses a wide variety of theatres, from new playwrights and devisors to theatres of movement, image and other forms of physical expression, from new acting methods to music theatre and multi-media production work. Recognising the plurality of contemporary performance practices, it encourages contributions on physical theatre, opera, dance, design and the increasingly blurred boundaries between the physical and the visual arts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信