土著自我消失?北美“易洛魁人战争”与南部非洲Mfecane的关系

IF 1.1 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
G. E. Dowd
{"title":"土著自我消失?北美“易洛魁人战争”与南部非洲Mfecane的关系","authors":"G. E. Dowd","doi":"10.1353/wmq.2022.0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Early American history and early Southern African history have much to offer one another, but signal debates in one field go unnoticed in the other. Both fields have witnessed strong efforts to reorient scholarship from older vantage points along the colonial coastlines to newer ones in the continental interiors. Both fields have investigated the consolidation of powerful indigenous social formations, and both fields have engaged the concept of settler colonialism. For a generation, however, Southern Africanists have robustly debated a period of great violence, the so-called Mfecane, said to have gripped indigenous peoples at the outer edges of, or even beyond the reach of, colonialism. Here Native North Americanists can learn from their Southern Africanist counterparts. This debate resembles and can contribute to early Americanists' discussion of such matters as the \"Iroquois Wars\" (also known as the \"Beaver Wars\") and the southeastern \"shatter zone.\" And exploring Southern Africanist scholarship offers more than new questions for consideration by Americanists. It also reveals a troubling shared backstory to the colonialist theme of indigenous self-vanishing.","PeriodicalId":51566,"journal":{"name":"WILLIAM AND MARY QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indigenous Self-Vanishing? Relating the North American \\\"Iroquois Wars\\\" and the Southern African Mfecane\",\"authors\":\"G. E. Dowd\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/wmq.2022.0030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Early American history and early Southern African history have much to offer one another, but signal debates in one field go unnoticed in the other. Both fields have witnessed strong efforts to reorient scholarship from older vantage points along the colonial coastlines to newer ones in the continental interiors. Both fields have investigated the consolidation of powerful indigenous social formations, and both fields have engaged the concept of settler colonialism. For a generation, however, Southern Africanists have robustly debated a period of great violence, the so-called Mfecane, said to have gripped indigenous peoples at the outer edges of, or even beyond the reach of, colonialism. Here Native North Americanists can learn from their Southern Africanist counterparts. This debate resembles and can contribute to early Americanists' discussion of such matters as the \\\"Iroquois Wars\\\" (also known as the \\\"Beaver Wars\\\") and the southeastern \\\"shatter zone.\\\" And exploring Southern Africanist scholarship offers more than new questions for consideration by Americanists. It also reveals a troubling shared backstory to the colonialist theme of indigenous self-vanishing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WILLIAM AND MARY QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WILLIAM AND MARY QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/wmq.2022.0030\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WILLIAM AND MARY QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/wmq.2022.0030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:早期的美国历史和早期的南部非洲历史可以相互提供很多东西,但在一个领域的信号辩论在另一个领域却被忽视了。这两个领域都做出了巨大努力,将学术从殖民地海岸线的旧有利位置重新定位到大陆内部的新有利位置。这两个领域都研究了强大的土著社会形态的巩固,并且都涉及定居者殖民主义的概念。然而,在一代人的时间里,南非主义者一直在激烈地辩论一段被称为Mfecane的大暴力时期,据说这段时期将土著人民置于殖民主义的边缘,甚至超出了殖民主义的范围。在这里,北美原住民可以向他们的南非人学习。这场辩论类似于并有助于早期美国主义者对“易洛魁人战争”(也称为“海狸战争”)和东南部“破碎地带”等问题的讨论。探索南非主义学术为美国主义者提供了更多新的问题。它还揭示了土著人自我消失这一殖民主义主题的一个令人不安的共同背景故事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Indigenous Self-Vanishing? Relating the North American "Iroquois Wars" and the Southern African Mfecane
Abstract:Early American history and early Southern African history have much to offer one another, but signal debates in one field go unnoticed in the other. Both fields have witnessed strong efforts to reorient scholarship from older vantage points along the colonial coastlines to newer ones in the continental interiors. Both fields have investigated the consolidation of powerful indigenous social formations, and both fields have engaged the concept of settler colonialism. For a generation, however, Southern Africanists have robustly debated a period of great violence, the so-called Mfecane, said to have gripped indigenous peoples at the outer edges of, or even beyond the reach of, colonialism. Here Native North Americanists can learn from their Southern Africanist counterparts. This debate resembles and can contribute to early Americanists' discussion of such matters as the "Iroquois Wars" (also known as the "Beaver Wars") and the southeastern "shatter zone." And exploring Southern Africanist scholarship offers more than new questions for consideration by Americanists. It also reveals a troubling shared backstory to the colonialist theme of indigenous self-vanishing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
52
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信