家庭和社区医学专家紧急援助中的医疗专业责任

Q3 Medicine
Josep Maria Benet-Martí , Carles Martin-Fumadó , Josep Benet-Travé , Esperanza L. Gómez-Durán , Josep Arimany-Manso , M. Magdalena Bertran-Ribera
{"title":"家庭和社区医学专家紧急援助中的医疗专业责任","authors":"Josep Maria Benet-Martí ,&nbsp;Carles Martin-Fumadó ,&nbsp;Josep Benet-Travé ,&nbsp;Esperanza L. Gómez-Durán ,&nbsp;Josep Arimany-Manso ,&nbsp;M. Magdalena Bertran-Ribera","doi":"10.1016/j.reml.2021.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Urgent assistance in primary care is a key area of the health system, being as an important stressor to be claimed for professional liability. The objective was to analyze the professional liability in primary care emergencies of specialists of family and community medicine and their main characteristics in our environment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective descriptive analysis of claims against General Practitioners between 1986 to 2015 was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>224 claims, all resolved, were analyzed, due to error or diagnostic delay (122-54.5%), accessibility problems in medical care (48-21.4%), treatment errors (29-12.9%) and errors in the issuance of documents (25-11.1%). In 147 (65.6%) it was urgent assistance and in 77 (34.3%) scheduled. The way of interposition was judicial in 71.4%. In 6 cases (2.6%) the resolution involved compensation in 3 cases of urgent assistance and 3 of scheduled.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The very low risk of claim and compensation payment is confirmed, with no differences found between urgent and scheduled assistance. Clinical safety aspects should be emphasized, especially in the diagnostic error.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35705,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Medicina Legal","volume":"48 1","pages":"Pages 3-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Responsabilidad profesional médica en la asistencia urgente de especialistas en medicina familiar y comunitaria\",\"authors\":\"Josep Maria Benet-Martí ,&nbsp;Carles Martin-Fumadó ,&nbsp;Josep Benet-Travé ,&nbsp;Esperanza L. Gómez-Durán ,&nbsp;Josep Arimany-Manso ,&nbsp;M. Magdalena Bertran-Ribera\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.reml.2021.03.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Urgent assistance in primary care is a key area of the health system, being as an important stressor to be claimed for professional liability. The objective was to analyze the professional liability in primary care emergencies of specialists of family and community medicine and their main characteristics in our environment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective descriptive analysis of claims against General Practitioners between 1986 to 2015 was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>224 claims, all resolved, were analyzed, due to error or diagnostic delay (122-54.5%), accessibility problems in medical care (48-21.4%), treatment errors (29-12.9%) and errors in the issuance of documents (25-11.1%). In 147 (65.6%) it was urgent assistance and in 77 (34.3%) scheduled. The way of interposition was judicial in 71.4%. In 6 cases (2.6%) the resolution involved compensation in 3 cases of urgent assistance and 3 of scheduled.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The very low risk of claim and compensation payment is confirmed, with no differences found between urgent and scheduled assistance. Clinical safety aspects should be emphasized, especially in the diagnostic error.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola de Medicina Legal\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 3-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola de Medicina Legal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377473221000389\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Medicina Legal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377473221000389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

初级保健紧急援助是卫生系统的一个关键领域,被视为一个重要的压力源,被要求承担专业责任。目的是分析家庭和社区医学专家在初级保健突发事件中的职业责任及其在我国环境中的主要特点。方法对1986 - 2015年全科医生的索赔进行回顾性描述性分析。结果224例理赔均因差错或诊断延误(122-54.5%)、医疗服务可及性问题(48-21.4%)、治疗错误(29-12.9%)和签发文件错误(25-11.1%)而得到解决。147个(65.6%)是紧急援助,77个(34.3%)是预定援助。干预方式为司法干预的占71.4%。在6个案件(2.6%)中,解决涉及3个紧急援助案件和3个预定援助案件的赔偿。结论紧急救助与定期救助的索赔和赔付风险均较低。临床安全方面应予以重视,尤其是在诊断错误方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Responsabilidad profesional médica en la asistencia urgente de especialistas en medicina familiar y comunitaria

Introduction

Urgent assistance in primary care is a key area of the health system, being as an important stressor to be claimed for professional liability. The objective was to analyze the professional liability in primary care emergencies of specialists of family and community medicine and their main characteristics in our environment.

Methods

Retrospective descriptive analysis of claims against General Practitioners between 1986 to 2015 was performed.

Results

224 claims, all resolved, were analyzed, due to error or diagnostic delay (122-54.5%), accessibility problems in medical care (48-21.4%), treatment errors (29-12.9%) and errors in the issuance of documents (25-11.1%). In 147 (65.6%) it was urgent assistance and in 77 (34.3%) scheduled. The way of interposition was judicial in 71.4%. In 6 cases (2.6%) the resolution involved compensation in 3 cases of urgent assistance and 3 of scheduled.

Conclusion

The very low risk of claim and compensation payment is confirmed, with no differences found between urgent and scheduled assistance. Clinical safety aspects should be emphasized, especially in the diagnostic error.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Espanola de Medicina Legal
Revista Espanola de Medicina Legal Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
41 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信