Josep Maria Benet-Martí , Carles Martin-Fumadó , Josep Benet-Travé , Esperanza L. Gómez-Durán , Josep Arimany-Manso , M. Magdalena Bertran-Ribera
{"title":"家庭和社区医学专家紧急援助中的医疗专业责任","authors":"Josep Maria Benet-Martí , Carles Martin-Fumadó , Josep Benet-Travé , Esperanza L. Gómez-Durán , Josep Arimany-Manso , M. Magdalena Bertran-Ribera","doi":"10.1016/j.reml.2021.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Urgent assistance in primary care is a key area of the health system, being as an important stressor to be claimed for professional liability. The objective was to analyze the professional liability in primary care emergencies of specialists of family and community medicine and their main characteristics in our environment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective descriptive analysis of claims against General Practitioners between 1986 to 2015 was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>224 claims, all resolved, were analyzed, due to error or diagnostic delay (122-54.5%), accessibility problems in medical care (48-21.4%), treatment errors (29-12.9%) and errors in the issuance of documents (25-11.1%). In 147 (65.6%) it was urgent assistance and in 77 (34.3%) scheduled. The way of interposition was judicial in 71.4%. In 6 cases (2.6%) the resolution involved compensation in 3 cases of urgent assistance and 3 of scheduled.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The very low risk of claim and compensation payment is confirmed, with no differences found between urgent and scheduled assistance. Clinical safety aspects should be emphasized, especially in the diagnostic error.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35705,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Medicina Legal","volume":"48 1","pages":"Pages 3-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Responsabilidad profesional médica en la asistencia urgente de especialistas en medicina familiar y comunitaria\",\"authors\":\"Josep Maria Benet-Martí , Carles Martin-Fumadó , Josep Benet-Travé , Esperanza L. Gómez-Durán , Josep Arimany-Manso , M. Magdalena Bertran-Ribera\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.reml.2021.03.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Urgent assistance in primary care is a key area of the health system, being as an important stressor to be claimed for professional liability. The objective was to analyze the professional liability in primary care emergencies of specialists of family and community medicine and their main characteristics in our environment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective descriptive analysis of claims against General Practitioners between 1986 to 2015 was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>224 claims, all resolved, were analyzed, due to error or diagnostic delay (122-54.5%), accessibility problems in medical care (48-21.4%), treatment errors (29-12.9%) and errors in the issuance of documents (25-11.1%). In 147 (65.6%) it was urgent assistance and in 77 (34.3%) scheduled. The way of interposition was judicial in 71.4%. In 6 cases (2.6%) the resolution involved compensation in 3 cases of urgent assistance and 3 of scheduled.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The very low risk of claim and compensation payment is confirmed, with no differences found between urgent and scheduled assistance. Clinical safety aspects should be emphasized, especially in the diagnostic error.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola de Medicina Legal\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 3-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola de Medicina Legal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377473221000389\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Medicina Legal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377473221000389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Responsabilidad profesional médica en la asistencia urgente de especialistas en medicina familiar y comunitaria
Introduction
Urgent assistance in primary care is a key area of the health system, being as an important stressor to be claimed for professional liability. The objective was to analyze the professional liability in primary care emergencies of specialists of family and community medicine and their main characteristics in our environment.
Methods
Retrospective descriptive analysis of claims against General Practitioners between 1986 to 2015 was performed.
Results
224 claims, all resolved, were analyzed, due to error or diagnostic delay (122-54.5%), accessibility problems in medical care (48-21.4%), treatment errors (29-12.9%) and errors in the issuance of documents (25-11.1%). In 147 (65.6%) it was urgent assistance and in 77 (34.3%) scheduled. The way of interposition was judicial in 71.4%. In 6 cases (2.6%) the resolution involved compensation in 3 cases of urgent assistance and 3 of scheduled.
Conclusion
The very low risk of claim and compensation payment is confirmed, with no differences found between urgent and scheduled assistance. Clinical safety aspects should be emphasized, especially in the diagnostic error.