A. Grishchenko, M. Sysoeva, T. M. Medvedeva, C. Rijn, B. Bezruchko, I. Sysoev
{"title":"连通性检测在棘波放电研究中的应用","authors":"A. Grishchenko, M. Sysoeva, T. M. Medvedeva, C. Rijn, B. Bezruchko, I. Sysoev","doi":"10.35470/2226-4116-2020-9-2-86-97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In our study, we compare three popular approaches to directed coupling analysis, in particular transfer entropy and two types of Granger causality, applied to real data from genetic absence epilepsy rats. We have chosen the channels for which the coupling architecture is already well known from previous studies. Recordings from 5 WAG/Rij rats of 8 hours duration with at least 28 spontaneous seizures of length not less than 6 s in each recording were studied. To test results for significance, surrogate signals based on series permutation technique were constructed. Connectivity development in time was investigated by considering six two-second intervals before, during and after the seizure. Our outcomes showed large differences between studied approaches, while all of them exploit the same general idea. Transfer entropy demonstrated the smallest number of significant couplings throughout all three considered measures, while the linear Granger causality showed the largest number of them. This indicates that transfer entropy is the most conservative measure and the least sensitive one. Its sensitivity is affected by insufficient series length. The linear Granger causality is likely to demonstrate insufficient specificity.","PeriodicalId":37674,"journal":{"name":"Cybernetics and Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Connectivity detection in application to spike-wave discharge study\",\"authors\":\"A. Grishchenko, M. Sysoeva, T. M. Medvedeva, C. Rijn, B. Bezruchko, I. Sysoev\",\"doi\":\"10.35470/2226-4116-2020-9-2-86-97\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In our study, we compare three popular approaches to directed coupling analysis, in particular transfer entropy and two types of Granger causality, applied to real data from genetic absence epilepsy rats. We have chosen the channels for which the coupling architecture is already well known from previous studies. Recordings from 5 WAG/Rij rats of 8 hours duration with at least 28 spontaneous seizures of length not less than 6 s in each recording were studied. To test results for significance, surrogate signals based on series permutation technique were constructed. Connectivity development in time was investigated by considering six two-second intervals before, during and after the seizure. Our outcomes showed large differences between studied approaches, while all of them exploit the same general idea. Transfer entropy demonstrated the smallest number of significant couplings throughout all three considered measures, while the linear Granger causality showed the largest number of them. This indicates that transfer entropy is the most conservative measure and the least sensitive one. Its sensitivity is affected by insufficient series length. The linear Granger causality is likely to demonstrate insufficient specificity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cybernetics and Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cybernetics and Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35470/2226-4116-2020-9-2-86-97\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Physics and Astronomy\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cybernetics and Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35470/2226-4116-2020-9-2-86-97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Physics and Astronomy","Score":null,"Total":0}
Connectivity detection in application to spike-wave discharge study
In our study, we compare three popular approaches to directed coupling analysis, in particular transfer entropy and two types of Granger causality, applied to real data from genetic absence epilepsy rats. We have chosen the channels for which the coupling architecture is already well known from previous studies. Recordings from 5 WAG/Rij rats of 8 hours duration with at least 28 spontaneous seizures of length not less than 6 s in each recording were studied. To test results for significance, surrogate signals based on series permutation technique were constructed. Connectivity development in time was investigated by considering six two-second intervals before, during and after the seizure. Our outcomes showed large differences between studied approaches, while all of them exploit the same general idea. Transfer entropy demonstrated the smallest number of significant couplings throughout all three considered measures, while the linear Granger causality showed the largest number of them. This indicates that transfer entropy is the most conservative measure and the least sensitive one. Its sensitivity is affected by insufficient series length. The linear Granger causality is likely to demonstrate insufficient specificity.
期刊介绍:
The scope of the journal includes: -Nonlinear dynamics and control -Complexity and self-organization -Control of oscillations -Control of chaos and bifurcations -Control in thermodynamics -Control of flows and turbulence -Information Physics -Cyber-physical systems -Modeling and identification of physical systems -Quantum information and control -Analysis and control of complex networks -Synchronization of systems and networks -Control of mechanical and micromechanical systems -Dynamics and control of plasma, beams, lasers, nanostructures -Applications of cybernetic methods in chemistry, biology, other natural sciences The papers in cybernetics with physical flavor as well as the papers in physics with cybernetic flavor are welcome. Cybernetics is assumed to include, in addition to control, such areas as estimation, filtering, optimization, identification, information theory, pattern recognition and other related areas.