在制度生活的漩涡中

IF 0.2 2区 艺术学 0 ART
ARTMargins Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.1162/artm_a_00313
A. Krauss, F. Thajib
{"title":"在制度生活的漩涡中","authors":"A. Krauss, F. Thajib","doi":"10.1162/artm_a_00313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following from a series of conversations that have been taking place sporadically between us in the past years, the current contribution serves as another opportunity to address ways of living multiple institutional lives. In our respective contexts, these pertain to different types of institutions, ranging from art school/academy, to university, to art or cultural organization/collective. Here we explore ways of traversing the boundaries and frictions between radical classroom practices and the institutional processes and frameworks that we speak and act within and against in the context of European higher arts education; all these environments are deeply entrenched in coloniality. We are drawn to radical classroom practices that experiment with forms of sociality that go beyond the dominant, modern-colonial model of meritocracy that dictates our lives in the academy and the labor market. We are interested in un/learning from accounts of educational practices in the lineage of pedagogues including Paulo Freire, bell hooks, Ivan Illich, Sandy Grande, Eve Tuck, Gesturing Towards Decolonial Futures, Gayatri Spivak, and Fred Moten/Stefano Harney. All these thinkers and practitioners share a perspective on education not as the solution to a problem but as a part of the problem (while still they engage in educational-institutional practices themselves). This","PeriodicalId":41203,"journal":{"name":"ARTMargins","volume":"11 1","pages":"10-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In The Vortex of Institutional Lives\",\"authors\":\"A. Krauss, F. Thajib\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/artm_a_00313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Following from a series of conversations that have been taking place sporadically between us in the past years, the current contribution serves as another opportunity to address ways of living multiple institutional lives. In our respective contexts, these pertain to different types of institutions, ranging from art school/academy, to university, to art or cultural organization/collective. Here we explore ways of traversing the boundaries and frictions between radical classroom practices and the institutional processes and frameworks that we speak and act within and against in the context of European higher arts education; all these environments are deeply entrenched in coloniality. We are drawn to radical classroom practices that experiment with forms of sociality that go beyond the dominant, modern-colonial model of meritocracy that dictates our lives in the academy and the labor market. We are interested in un/learning from accounts of educational practices in the lineage of pedagogues including Paulo Freire, bell hooks, Ivan Illich, Sandy Grande, Eve Tuck, Gesturing Towards Decolonial Futures, Gayatri Spivak, and Fred Moten/Stefano Harney. All these thinkers and practitioners share a perspective on education not as the solution to a problem but as a part of the problem (while still they engage in educational-institutional practices themselves). This\",\"PeriodicalId\":41203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARTMargins\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"10-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARTMargins\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/artm_a_00313\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARTMargins","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/artm_a_00313","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

继过去几年我们之间偶尔进行的一系列对话之后,目前的贡献是解决多种制度生活方式的又一次机会。在我们各自的背景下,这些机构属于不同类型的机构,从艺术学校/学院到大学,再到艺术或文化组织/集体。在这里,我们探讨了如何跨越激进的课堂实践与我们在欧洲高等艺术教育中所说和所反对的制度过程和框架之间的界限和摩擦;所有这些环境都深深植根于殖民主义。我们被激进的课堂实践所吸引,这些实践的社会形式超越了支配我们在学院和劳动力市场生活的精英统治的现代殖民模式。我们感兴趣的是从保罗·弗雷尔(Paulo Freire)、贝尔胡克(bell hooks)、伊万·伊里奇(Ivan Illich)、桑迪·格兰德(Sandy Grande)、伊芙·塔克(Eve Tuck。所有这些思想家和实践者都有一个共同的观点,认为教育不是问题的解决方案,而是问题的一部分(尽管他们自己仍在从事教育制度实践)。这
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In The Vortex of Institutional Lives
Following from a series of conversations that have been taking place sporadically between us in the past years, the current contribution serves as another opportunity to address ways of living multiple institutional lives. In our respective contexts, these pertain to different types of institutions, ranging from art school/academy, to university, to art or cultural organization/collective. Here we explore ways of traversing the boundaries and frictions between radical classroom practices and the institutional processes and frameworks that we speak and act within and against in the context of European higher arts education; all these environments are deeply entrenched in coloniality. We are drawn to radical classroom practices that experiment with forms of sociality that go beyond the dominant, modern-colonial model of meritocracy that dictates our lives in the academy and the labor market. We are interested in un/learning from accounts of educational practices in the lineage of pedagogues including Paulo Freire, bell hooks, Ivan Illich, Sandy Grande, Eve Tuck, Gesturing Towards Decolonial Futures, Gayatri Spivak, and Fred Moten/Stefano Harney. All these thinkers and practitioners share a perspective on education not as the solution to a problem but as a part of the problem (while still they engage in educational-institutional practices themselves). This
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ARTMargins
ARTMargins ART-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: ARTMargins publishes scholarly articles and essays about contemporary art, media, architecture, and critical theory. ARTMargins studies art practices and visual culture in the emerging global margins, from North Africa and the Middle East to the Americas, Eastern and Western Europe, Asia and Australasia. The journal acts as a forum for scholars, theoreticians, and critics from a variety of disciplines who are interested in art and politics in transitional countries and regions; postsocialism and neo-liberalism; postmodernism and postcolonialism, and their critiques; and the problem of global art and global art history and its methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信