{"title":"Grit对工作相关结果非认知预测因子的增量有效性","authors":"Bianca Iancu, A. Ion","doi":"10.24837/pru.v21i1.522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzes grit's validity in predicting several work-relevant outcomes (in-role performance, counter-productive work behaviors, job satisfaction) over the Five-Factor Model, and core self-evaluations. Hierarchical regression analyses were used in order to estimate grit's incremental validity over the canonical five-factor dimensions and core-self-evaluation. Findings indicate that grit does not explain significant amounts of variance in job-related outcomes.","PeriodicalId":37470,"journal":{"name":"Psihologia Resurselor Umane","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grit’s Incremental Validity over Non-Cognitive Predictors of Job-Relevant Outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Bianca Iancu, A. Ion\",\"doi\":\"10.24837/pru.v21i1.522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study analyzes grit's validity in predicting several work-relevant outcomes (in-role performance, counter-productive work behaviors, job satisfaction) over the Five-Factor Model, and core self-evaluations. Hierarchical regression analyses were used in order to estimate grit's incremental validity over the canonical five-factor dimensions and core-self-evaluation. Findings indicate that grit does not explain significant amounts of variance in job-related outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psihologia Resurselor Umane\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psihologia Resurselor Umane\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24837/pru.v21i1.522\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psihologia Resurselor Umane","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24837/pru.v21i1.522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
Grit’s Incremental Validity over Non-Cognitive Predictors of Job-Relevant Outcomes
This study analyzes grit's validity in predicting several work-relevant outcomes (in-role performance, counter-productive work behaviors, job satisfaction) over the Five-Factor Model, and core self-evaluations. Hierarchical regression analyses were used in order to estimate grit's incremental validity over the canonical five-factor dimensions and core-self-evaluation. Findings indicate that grit does not explain significant amounts of variance in job-related outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Psihologia Resurselor Umane Journal is the official journal of the Association of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (APIO). PRU is devoted to publishing original investigations that contribute to an understanding of situational and individual challenges within an organizational context and that bring forth new knowledge in the field. The journal publishes primarily empirical articles and also welcomes methodological and theoretical articles on a broad range of topics covered by Organizational, Industrial, Work, Personnel and Occupational Health Psychology. Audience includes scholars, educators, managers, HR professionals, organizational consultants, practitioners in organizational and employee development.