{"title":"翻译科学与翻译科学:科学阐释话语中的蚂蚁","authors":"Nabila Shema Shabriyah, Miski Miski","doi":"10.21154/dialogia.v21i1.5982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This article is based on the Ayat-Ayat Semes ta dan Nalar Ayat-ayat Semesta written by Agus Purwanto and Tafsir 'Ilmi: Animals in the Perspective of the Qur'an and Science published by Lembaga Pentashih Mushaf al-Qur'an (LPMQ) of the Ministry of Religious Affairs of Indonesia in collaboration with the Indonesian Institute of Sciences with a focus on the interpretation of the word \"Ant\" or al-namlah in QS. al-Naml [27]: 18. Preliminary findings show that the interpretations of Puwanto and LPMQ tend to be different even though they are both based on scientific reasons. There are three questions asked in explaining this. First, what is the construction of Agus Purwanto and LPMQ's interpretation of \"Ants\" in the Qur'an. Second, why do the two differ in interpretation regarding the theme? Third, what are the implications of these different interpretations on the discourse of ilmi interpretation. This article uses content analysis to show Purwanto's interpretive construction of the diction \"Qā lat namlah\" in QS. al-Naml [27]:18 means \"queen of ants,\" while LPMQ means \"al-namlah\" with \"an ant,\" so it has a different meaning. This difference lies in the emphasis of both; Purwanto emphasizes more linguistic aspects as a support for scientific findings to interpret \"al-namlah\" with the queen ant, which also emphasizes that this queen is the leader in the colony. At the same time, LPMQ uses an interpretive logic that does not emphasize \"who rules the ants\"","PeriodicalId":42058,"journal":{"name":"Dialogia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tafsir Ilmi Versus Tafsir Ilmi: Ants in Scientific Interpretation Discourses\",\"authors\":\"Nabila Shema Shabriyah, Miski Miski\",\"doi\":\"10.21154/dialogia.v21i1.5982\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": This article is based on the Ayat-Ayat Semes ta dan Nalar Ayat-ayat Semesta written by Agus Purwanto and Tafsir 'Ilmi: Animals in the Perspective of the Qur'an and Science published by Lembaga Pentashih Mushaf al-Qur'an (LPMQ) of the Ministry of Religious Affairs of Indonesia in collaboration with the Indonesian Institute of Sciences with a focus on the interpretation of the word \\\"Ant\\\" or al-namlah in QS. al-Naml [27]: 18. Preliminary findings show that the interpretations of Puwanto and LPMQ tend to be different even though they are both based on scientific reasons. There are three questions asked in explaining this. First, what is the construction of Agus Purwanto and LPMQ's interpretation of \\\"Ants\\\" in the Qur'an. Second, why do the two differ in interpretation regarding the theme? Third, what are the implications of these different interpretations on the discourse of ilmi interpretation. This article uses content analysis to show Purwanto's interpretive construction of the diction \\\"Qā lat namlah\\\" in QS. al-Naml [27]:18 means \\\"queen of ants,\\\" while LPMQ means \\\"al-namlah\\\" with \\\"an ant,\\\" so it has a different meaning. This difference lies in the emphasis of both; Purwanto emphasizes more linguistic aspects as a support for scientific findings to interpret \\\"al-namlah\\\" with the queen ant, which also emphasizes that this queen is the leader in the colony. At the same time, LPMQ uses an interpretive logic that does not emphasize \\\"who rules the ants\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":42058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dialogia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dialogia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21154/dialogia.v21i1.5982\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21154/dialogia.v21i1.5982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
:本文基于Agus Purwanto和Tafsir’Ilmi撰写的Ayat Ayat Semes ta dan Nalar Ayat Ayet Semesta:《古兰经与科学视角下的动物》,由印度尼西亚宗教事务部Lembaga Pentashih Mushaf al-Quran(LPMQ)与印度尼西亚科学研究所合作出版,重点是对“蚂蚁”一词的解释QS的al-namlah。al-Naml[27]:18。初步发现表明,Puwanto和LPMQ的解释往往不同,尽管它们都是基于科学原因。在解释这一点时,有三个问题。首先,阿古斯·普万托的结构和LPMQ对《古兰经》中“蚂蚁”的解释是什么。第二,为什么两者对主题的理解不同?第三,这些不同的解读对伊尔米解读的话语有何启示。本文通过内容分析,展示了普万托对QS中“Qālat namlah”一词的解释性建构。al-Naml[27]:18的意思是“蚂蚁女王”,而LPMQ的意思是与“蚂蚁”一起的“al-namlah”,所以它有不同的含义。这种区别在于两者的侧重点;Purwanto强调更多的语言方面,作为对科学发现的支持,用蚁后来解释“al-namlah”,这也强调了蚁后是殖民地的领导者。同时,LPMQ使用了一种解释逻辑,不强调“谁统治蚂蚁”
Tafsir Ilmi Versus Tafsir Ilmi: Ants in Scientific Interpretation Discourses
: This article is based on the Ayat-Ayat Semes ta dan Nalar Ayat-ayat Semesta written by Agus Purwanto and Tafsir 'Ilmi: Animals in the Perspective of the Qur'an and Science published by Lembaga Pentashih Mushaf al-Qur'an (LPMQ) of the Ministry of Religious Affairs of Indonesia in collaboration with the Indonesian Institute of Sciences with a focus on the interpretation of the word "Ant" or al-namlah in QS. al-Naml [27]: 18. Preliminary findings show that the interpretations of Puwanto and LPMQ tend to be different even though they are both based on scientific reasons. There are three questions asked in explaining this. First, what is the construction of Agus Purwanto and LPMQ's interpretation of "Ants" in the Qur'an. Second, why do the two differ in interpretation regarding the theme? Third, what are the implications of these different interpretations on the discourse of ilmi interpretation. This article uses content analysis to show Purwanto's interpretive construction of the diction "Qā lat namlah" in QS. al-Naml [27]:18 means "queen of ants," while LPMQ means "al-namlah" with "an ant," so it has a different meaning. This difference lies in the emphasis of both; Purwanto emphasizes more linguistic aspects as a support for scientific findings to interpret "al-namlah" with the queen ant, which also emphasizes that this queen is the leader in the colony. At the same time, LPMQ uses an interpretive logic that does not emphasize "who rules the ants"