有焦虑和抑郁风险的大学生足球运动员使用心理策略的倾向

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Julianna Zilli, Hayes Bennett, Jim Mensch, Eva V Monsma
{"title":"有焦虑和抑郁风险的大学生足球运动员使用心理策略的倾向","authors":"Julianna Zilli, Hayes Bennett, Jim Mensch, Eva V Monsma","doi":"10.1080/19357397.2021.1924565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Psychological strategies (PS) developed for performance enhancement are common in therapeutic approaches for mitigating mental health risks; however, associations between common PS used by collegiate athletes and such risks are relatively unexplored. Collegiate soccer players (N = 72) completed the Test of Performance Strategies (TOPS), the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies- Depression scale (CES-D). Results indicated collegiate athletes categorically not at risk for anxiety or depression used PS more, while those at risk reported using debilitative strategies. The lack of emotional control in practice explained the most variance in predicting BAI (29%) and CES-D (36%) scores, while negative thinking in competition explained the most variance in BAI (30%) and CES-D (35%) scores. Findings are discussed in terms of familiarizing athletes with the range of PS and their relevance for mitigating mental health risk triggers in the age of COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":56347,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education","volume":"17 1","pages":"236 - 254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19357397.2021.1924565","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The propensity of psychological strategies used by collegiate soccer players at risk for anxiety and depression\",\"authors\":\"Julianna Zilli, Hayes Bennett, Jim Mensch, Eva V Monsma\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19357397.2021.1924565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Psychological strategies (PS) developed for performance enhancement are common in therapeutic approaches for mitigating mental health risks; however, associations between common PS used by collegiate athletes and such risks are relatively unexplored. Collegiate soccer players (N = 72) completed the Test of Performance Strategies (TOPS), the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies- Depression scale (CES-D). Results indicated collegiate athletes categorically not at risk for anxiety or depression used PS more, while those at risk reported using debilitative strategies. The lack of emotional control in practice explained the most variance in predicting BAI (29%) and CES-D (36%) scores, while negative thinking in competition explained the most variance in BAI (30%) and CES-D (35%) scores. Findings are discussed in terms of familiarizing athletes with the range of PS and their relevance for mitigating mental health risk triggers in the age of COVID-19.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"236 - 254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19357397.2021.1924565\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19357397.2021.1924565\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19357397.2021.1924565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为提高表现而开发的心理策略(PS)在减轻心理健康风险的治疗方法中很常见;然而,大学运动员使用的常见PS与此类风险之间的联系相对未被探索。大学生足球运动员(N = 72)完成了绩效策略测试(TOPS)、贝克焦虑量表(BAI)和流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)。结果表明,完全没有焦虑或抑郁风险的大学生运动员更多地使用PS,而那些有风险的运动员则报告使用了衰弱策略。实践中缺乏情绪控制解释了预测BAI(29%)和CES-D(36%)得分的最大差异,而竞争中的消极思维解释了BAI(30%)和CES-D(35%)得分的最多差异。在新冠肺炎年龄段,从熟悉PS范围及其与减轻心理健康风险触发因素的相关性的角度讨论了研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The propensity of psychological strategies used by collegiate soccer players at risk for anxiety and depression
ABSTRACT Psychological strategies (PS) developed for performance enhancement are common in therapeutic approaches for mitigating mental health risks; however, associations between common PS used by collegiate athletes and such risks are relatively unexplored. Collegiate soccer players (N = 72) completed the Test of Performance Strategies (TOPS), the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies- Depression scale (CES-D). Results indicated collegiate athletes categorically not at risk for anxiety or depression used PS more, while those at risk reported using debilitative strategies. The lack of emotional control in practice explained the most variance in predicting BAI (29%) and CES-D (36%) scores, while negative thinking in competition explained the most variance in BAI (30%) and CES-D (35%) scores. Findings are discussed in terms of familiarizing athletes with the range of PS and their relevance for mitigating mental health risk triggers in the age of COVID-19.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信